<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WD5 missed Mars? Maybe.</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sespetoxri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68654</link>
		<dc:creator>Sespetoxri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68654</guid>
		<description>Nothing except the same old rhetoric, MrQhuest.  Personally I've given up trying to talk reason and science over there.  They've decided they want to believe what they wish and won't be gainsaid by little things like science and common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing except the same old rhetoric, MrQhuest.  Personally I&#8217;ve given up trying to talk reason and science over there.  They&#8217;ve decided they want to believe what they wish and won&#8217;t be gainsaid by little things like science and common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrQhuest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68653</link>
		<dc:creator>MrQhuest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68653</guid>
		<description>TU24's website now automatically redirects to their forum. Not a word elsewhere.... interesting. Did they apologize, or admit they were wrong when I wasn't looking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TU24&#8217;s website now automatically redirects to their forum. Not a word elsewhere&#8230;. interesting. Did they apologize, or admit they were wrong when I wasn&#8217;t looking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lugosi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68652</link>
		<dc:creator>Lugosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68652</guid>
		<description>Any bets on how long before there's a wd5.org website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any bets on how long before there&#8217;s a wd5.org website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Mom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68651</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68651</guid>
		<description>TU24 had a huge effect.  It was pitch black outside at closest approach.  A mere six hours later the sky was flooded with visible light.  I saw it with my own eyes.

Coincidence?  I think not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TU24 had a huge effect.  It was pitch black outside at closest approach.  A mere six hours later the sky was flooded with visible light.  I saw it with my own eyes.</p>
<p>Coincidence?  I think not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68650</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68650</guid>
		<description>@Ian: Yea, because there obviously wasn't any asteroids before 2012 neared. &#60;&#60;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ian: Yea, because there obviously wasn&#8217;t any asteroids before 2012 neared. &lt;&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68649</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68649</guid>
		<description>Please don't point that out to them.  I've already seen a few members of there sliding into babbling about how all the newly found asteroids demonstrate that the 2012 Mayan calendar stuff must be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t point that out to them.  I&#8217;ve already seen a few members of there sliding into babbling about how all the newly found asteroids demonstrate that the 2012 Mayan calendar stuff must be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celtic_Evolution</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68648</link>
		<dc:creator>Celtic_Evolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/05/wd5-missed-mars-maybe/#comment-68648</guid>
		<description>That IS true, Michelle... it's 50 degrees F. here in upstae NY in February!  Can't be coincidence.  How totally block-headed of me.  Must be the heat is getting to me.  ;)

But wait!  That's not even the record high for this day here.  That would be 63 degrees F. in 1991.  I wonder what asteroid went whizzing past that year, frogging up the works?... can someone look that up for me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That IS true, Michelle&#8230; it&#8217;s 50 degrees F. here in upstae NY in February!  Can&#8217;t be coincidence.  How totally block-headed of me.  Must be the heat is getting to me.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
But wait!  That&#8217;s not even the record high for this day here.  That would be 63 degrees F. in 1991.  I wonder what asteroid went whizzing past that year, frogging up the works?&#8230; can someone look that up for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
