<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minor Shuttle damage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiv</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69626</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69626</guid>
		<description>oh yeah, I have pictures from the launch:

http://pigeonfish.info/pics/launch2-7-08/

Hope this is just a minor hitch, nothing big for the mission.

According to this: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5354 it looks like the tile damage is minimal, and they&#039;re still determining whether it&#039;s worth the EVA to stick down the blanket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah, I have pictures from the launch:</p>
<p><a href="http://pigeonfish.info/pics/launch2-7-08/" rel="nofollow">http://pigeonfish.info/pics/launch2-7-08/</a></p>
<p>Hope this is just a minor hitch, nothing big for the mission.</p>
<p>According to this: <a href="http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5354" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5354</a> it looks like the tile damage is minimal, and they&#8217;re still determining whether it&#8217;s worth the EVA to stick down the blanket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pop</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69625</link>
		<dc:creator>Pop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69625</guid>
		<description>Duct tape!  Just put some duct tape on the tear.  Another term for duct tape is/was 200MPH tape.  Seems it was used to patch and repair airplanes and would stick at speeds of 200MPH.  Actually, it was used to cover minor holes in jet aircraft during Vietnam hostilities.  So, I guess it could be called 500MPH tape or some such.  If it stuck during re-entry, the speed rating could be upped.  Great selling point for 3M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duct tape!  Just put some duct tape on the tear.  Another term for duct tape is/was 200MPH tape.  Seems it was used to patch and repair airplanes and would stick at speeds of 200MPH.  Actually, it was used to cover minor holes in jet aircraft during Vietnam hostilities.  So, I guess it could be called 500MPH tape or some such.  If it stuck during re-entry, the speed rating could be upped.  Great selling point for 3M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69624</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69624</guid>
		<description>So let me get this straight - the outer layer of the shuttle in those areas is a blanket????  Soft, as opposed to a hard shell?  I understand the leading edges are the heat tiles for re-entry, I guess I assumed all of the exterior surfaces were a hard shell of some sort, like, oh, an airplane.

I am gobsmacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this straight &#8211; the outer layer of the shuttle in those areas is a blanket????  Soft, as opposed to a hard shell?  I understand the leading edges are the heat tiles for re-entry, I guess I assumed all of the exterior surfaces were a hard shell of some sort, like, oh, an airplane.</p>
<p>I am gobsmacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69621</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69621</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, right. OK, I fixed it. Thanks for the correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, right. OK, I fixed it. Thanks for the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69623</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69623</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing that out, Igor.  I was going to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing that out, Igor.  I was going to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor Carron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69622</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor Carron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69622</guid>
		<description>Phil,

Damaris is not an astronaut trainee. She wants to be an astronaut, there is a difference. She obviously has the will and capabilities to be one. It would be very nice if you could make that correction. Thanks in advance,

Igor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>Damaris is not an astronaut trainee. She wants to be an astronaut, there is a difference. She obviously has the will and capabilities to be one. It would be very nice if you could make that correction. Thanks in advance,</p>
<p>Igor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lugosi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69620</link>
		<dc:creator>Lugosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69620</guid>
		<description>Considering what&#039;s at stake, someone needs to make damn sure that thing is safe before re-entry. Not to minimize the lives of the astronauts themselves, but the loss of another orbiter would end America&#039;s manned space program for at least the next decade, doom the Hubble Telescope (without the scheduled repair mission, it probably won&#039;t last another two years), and end any future expansions or major repairs to the ISS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering what&#8217;s at stake, someone needs to make damn sure that thing is safe before re-entry. Not to minimize the lives of the astronauts themselves, but the loss of another orbiter would end America&#8217;s manned space program for at least the next decade, doom the Hubble Telescope (without the scheduled repair mission, it probably won&#8217;t last another two years), and end any future expansions or major repairs to the ISS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69619</link>
		<dc:creator>CR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69619</guid>
		<description>Careful, Mark Martin! Admitting that might give conspiracy theorists ammo, just like the fact the tape was used on the Lunar Modules. (roll eyes)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful, Mark Martin! Admitting that might give conspiracy theorists ammo, just like the fact the tape was used on the Lunar Modules. (roll eyes)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69618</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69618</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t worry a bit about such a small amount of damage to that particular area. I&#039;d even consider an EVA to fix it a greater risk than to just leave it alone. I used to work for the company which made the original sets of those low-temperature blankets, and made blankets myself of that same material for other insulation applications. It&#039;s good stuff, but it&#039;s also definitely not robust enough to stay intact under stresses large enough to tear apart the spacecraft. In other words, it&#039;s there mainly as an over-engineering measure. If the temperature and, especially, aerodynamic conditions were really that critical, there&#039;d be thermal tiles there instead of what are essentially quilts of low-density glass batting sewn between sheets of glass cloth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t worry a bit about such a small amount of damage to that particular area. I&#8217;d even consider an EVA to fix it a greater risk than to just leave it alone. I used to work for the company which made the original sets of those low-temperature blankets, and made blankets myself of that same material for other insulation applications. It&#8217;s good stuff, but it&#8217;s also definitely not robust enough to stay intact under stresses large enough to tear apart the spacecraft. In other words, it&#8217;s there mainly as an over-engineering measure. If the temperature and, especially, aerodynamic conditions were really that critical, there&#8217;d be thermal tiles there instead of what are essentially quilts of low-density glass batting sewn between sheets of glass cloth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radwaste</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69617</link>
		<dc:creator>Radwaste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69617</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait for the Ares-class launchers to be ready. I&#039;m really tired of seeing so much time and $$ spent on this sorry idea.

I had the opportunity to speak to a few of the KSC veterans a few years ago, courtesy of The Man and his traffic court, and they lamented the current &quot;leadership&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the Ares-class launchers to be ready. I&#8217;m really tired of seeing so much time and $$ spent on this sorry idea.</p>
<p>I had the opportunity to speak to a few of the KSC veterans a few years ago, courtesy of The Man and his traffic court, and they lamented the current &#8220;leadership&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lonergan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69616</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lonergan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69616</guid>
		<description>CNN also says that there is tile damage by the front wheel well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN also says that there is tile damage by the front wheel well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69615</link>
		<dc:creator>NickW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69615</guid>
		<description>I thought it was a bunny rabbit :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was a bunny rabbit <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69614</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69614</guid>
		<description>And if you look really closely, you can see a miniature Bigfoot pulling the blanket up over his head!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you look really closely, you can see a miniature Bigfoot pulling the blanket up over his head!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-69613</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/09/minor-shuttle-damage/#comment-69613</guid>
		<description>IIRC, it was &lt;i&gt;Atlantis&lt;/i&gt; last time that had the OMS pod blanket problem. I sure hope when they get back it doesn&#039;t compromise the Hubble mission seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC, it was <i>Atlantis</i> last time that had the OMS pod blanket problem. I sure hope when they get back it doesn&#8217;t compromise the Hubble mission seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 16:12:36 -->
