<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hubble and Spitzer find most distant galaxy</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grouchy O Man</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-151777</link>
		<dc:creator>Grouchy O Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-151777</guid>
		<description>If the universe is 14b years old, and we see galaxies/stars that are over 12b lightyears away, how did we get here so fast? How did we get here 12b years before the light? 
Imagine how embarrassing it must be for that light (the fastest thing in the universe) to spend 12b years traveling across space and finding out we've been waiting for all that time.
By the way, the accelleration of the expansion of the universe is probably caused by a massive gravitational "pull"eminating from beyond the "bubble" in which the universe is located. the closer we get to it the faster we are drawn toward it. Makes sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the universe is 14b years old, and we see galaxies/stars that are over 12b lightyears away, how did we get here so fast? How did we get here 12b years before the light?<br />
Imagine how embarrassing it must be for that light (the fastest thing in the universe) to spend 12b years traveling across space and finding out we&#8217;ve been waiting for all that time.<br />
By the way, the accelleration of the expansion of the universe is probably caused by a massive gravitational &#8220;pull&#8221;eminating from beyond the &#8220;bubble&#8221; in which the universe is located. the closer we get to it the faster we are drawn toward it. Makes sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-116588</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 07:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-116588</guid>
		<description>If the universe did indeed start out as a singularity, was it infinitely small, or infinitely large.  For some reason we assume without any frame of reference that it was infinitely small when it may well have been both at once (think about it, if space did not yet exist then neither did size)  So what does that make the current universe, finite or infinite?  And by the way, despite the previous poor attempts at satire, religious people do wonder at the science behind all of this and marvel at the beauty of the universe. And while I am at it, let me ask this question:  If space is expanding, and it certainly seems to be doing just that, then is it not also expanding on the microscopic level.  Would that makes Planck's constant actually a variable, varying by the rate of expansion.  Would those of you not laughing too hard take at stab at this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the universe did indeed start out as a singularity, was it infinitely small, or infinitely large.  For some reason we assume without any frame of reference that it was infinitely small when it may well have been both at once (think about it, if space did not yet exist then neither did size)  So what does that make the current universe, finite or infinite?  And by the way, despite the previous poor attempts at satire, religious people do wonder at the science behind all of this and marvel at the beauty of the universe. And while I am at it, let me ask this question:  If space is expanding, and it certainly seems to be doing just that, then is it not also expanding on the microscopic level.  Would that makes Planck&#8217;s constant actually a variable, varying by the rate of expansion.  Would those of you not laughing too hard take at stab at this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70135</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70135</guid>
		<description>Cusp writes:

[[&lt;i&gt;[Not a Britney fan, although everyone should cut the poor woman some slack - so no, I’d rather not]&lt;/i&gt;]]

Thank you for saying that, Cusp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cusp writes:</p>
<p>[[<i>[Not a Britney fan, although everyone should cut the poor woman some slack - so no, I’d rather not]</i>]]</p>
<p>Thank you for saying that, Cusp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70134</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70134</guid>
		<description>sean hogge writes:

[[&lt;i&gt;What does it take to determine if a galaxy is moving toward or away from us? A difference in the redshift over time?&lt;/i&gt;]]

If it has a red shift it is moving away from us, if it has a blue shift it is moving toward us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sean hogge writes:</p>
<p>[[<i>What does it take to determine if a galaxy is moving toward or away from us? A difference in the redshift over time?</i>]]</p>
<p>If it has a red shift it is moving away from us, if it has a blue shift it is moving toward us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70133</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70133</guid>
		<description>Flonkbob writes:

[[&lt;i&gt;Of course I worry about anyone who listens to invisbile [&lt;/i&gt;sic&lt;i&gt;] sky fairies.&lt;/i&gt;]]

Do you think calling God a "sky fairy" proves anything other than that you enjoy insulting people who disagree with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flonkbob writes:</p>
<p>[[<i>Of course I worry about anyone who listens to invisbile [</i>sic<i>] sky fairies.</i>]]</p>
<p>Do you think calling God a &#8220;sky fairy&#8221; proves anything other than that you enjoy insulting people who disagree with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searching Physical Science? BBC NEWS &#124; Science/Nature &#124;&#8230;. &#187; Science Discoveries . net</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70132</link>
		<dc:creator>Searching Physical Science? BBC NEWS &#124; Science/Nature &#124;&#8230;. &#187; Science Discoveries . net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70132</guid>
		<description>[...] Hubble and Spitzer find most distant galaxy Hot on the heels of that fabulous Spitzer image comes news that Hubble and Spitzer have teamed up to find what may be the most distant galaxy ever seen. It appears to be at a distance of 12.8 billion light years. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hubble and Spitzer find most distant galaxy Hot on the heels of that fabulous Spitzer image comes news that Hubble and Spitzer have teamed up to find what may be the most distant galaxy ever seen. It appears to be at a distance of 12.8 billion light years. &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cusp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70131</link>
		<dc:creator>Cusp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/12/hubble-and-spitzer-find-most-distant-galaxy/#comment-70131</guid>
		<description>ps - Davis and Linewaver's first figure shows the universe in "confomal coordinates" - this clearly shows how far we can currently see - and also how far we will ever see (even though the universe has an infinite future, we will only see a finite part of it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps - Davis and Linewaver&#8217;s first figure shows the universe in &#8220;confomal coordinates&#8221; - this clearly shows how far we can currently see - and also how far we will ever see (even though the universe has an infinite future, we will only see a finite part of it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
