<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday mornin&#8217; politics and science</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70814</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70814</guid>
		<description>If I recall right wasn't it 'DarkSyde' or 'DailyKos' that posted a spectauclar artwork of Gliese 581c  (or link to same?) when it was first discovered and  - we now think wrongly - considered to be potentially habitable?
One the BA in turn linked to or posted on?

So they're not all politics ...

Sane and intelligent politicians in the USA - I wish em all the best &#38; hope, really hope, they do better than many in the world expect based on past history ..

I can think of a few better things to do on Sunday  - or any morning than sit in front of a computer .. ;-)

(Not knocking blogs or 'puters mind you jus' sayin' ..)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall right wasn&#8217;t it &#8216;DarkSyde&#8217; or &#8216;DailyKos&#8217; that posted a spectauclar artwork of Gliese 581c  (or link to same?) when it was first discovered and  - we now think wrongly - considered to be potentially habitable?<br />
One the BA in turn linked to or posted on?</p>
<p>So they&#8217;re not all politics &#8230;</p>
<p>Sane and intelligent politicians in the USA - I wish em all the best &amp; hope, really hope, they do better than many in the world expect based on past history ..</p>
<p>I can think of a few better things to do on Sunday  - or any morning than sit in front of a computer .. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
(Not knocking blogs or &#8216;puters mind you jus&#8217; sayin&#8217; ..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70813</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70813</guid>
		<description>The BBC article  is a report on the AAAS meeting...

It summarizes at least two talks.  The 1st by Michael Meyer, describes the Spitzer results that BA describes in another blog entry: Earths may be common in the galaxy.  (don't know how to make a link)  The second talk was by Alan Stern discussing how many undiscovered planets there might be in the Kuiper Belt and possibly in the Oort Cloud.

There is also a section quoting Debra Fischer on the "Goldilocks Zone", but I can't tell if this was a talk or an interview.

Anyway, the 2nd paragraph (after the lead-in) is a summary of Meyer's remarks and the 3rd paragraph is a summary of Stern's.  The reported is definitely *not* confusing the solar system with the galaxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC article  is a report on the AAAS meeting&#8230;</p>
<p>It summarizes at least two talks.  The 1st by Michael Meyer, describes the Spitzer results that BA describes in another blog entry: Earths may be common in the galaxy.  (don&#8217;t know how to make a link)  The second talk was by Alan Stern discussing how many undiscovered planets there might be in the Kuiper Belt and possibly in the Oort Cloud.</p>
<p>There is also a section quoting Debra Fischer on the &#8220;Goldilocks Zone&#8221;, but I can&#8217;t tell if this was a talk or an interview.</p>
<p>Anyway, the 2nd paragraph (after the lead-in) is a summary of Meyer&#8217;s remarks and the 3rd paragraph is a summary of Stern&#8217;s.  The reported is definitely *not* confusing the solar system with the galaxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danezia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70812</link>
		<dc:creator>danezia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70812</guid>
		<description>@AI...

In the original story (saved a copy... in case you would want to read it yourself)... the author clearly made a confusion between galaxy and solar system.

I may not be a native english speaker but I'm not that dumb...

HINT!
You should have noticed the title change of the article from:

‘Hundreds of worlds’ in Milky Way

to

Planet-hunters set for big bounty

Why would somebody change the article title in less than a day if everything was ok?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AI&#8230;</p>
<p>In the original story (saved a copy&#8230; in case you would want to read it yourself)&#8230; the author clearly made a confusion between galaxy and solar system.</p>
<p>I may not be a native english speaker but I&#8217;m not that dumb&#8230;</p>
<p>HINT!<br />
You should have noticed the title change of the article from:</p>
<p>‘Hundreds of worlds’ in Milky Way</p>
<p>to</p>
<p>Planet-hunters set for big bounty</p>
<p>Why would somebody change the article title in less than a day if everything was ok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70811</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70811</guid>
		<description>I'm glad my congressman is Rush Holt.  His bumper stickers read "My congressman IS a rocket scientist."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad my congressman is Rush Holt.  His bumper stickers read &#8220;My congressman IS a rocket scientist.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70810</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70810</guid>
		<description>@Danezia

I read that BBC story too: I think you've skipped over the significant word "also" in that sentence you quote. To me it seemed quite clear that the author knew the difference between our solar system and our galaxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Danezia</p>
<p>I read that BBC story too: I think you&#8217;ve skipped over the significant word &#8220;also&#8221; in that sentence you quote. To me it seemed quite clear that the author knew the difference between our solar system and our galaxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt E.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70809</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70809</guid>
		<description>"Wow! Intelligent people running for public office?
What’s next? The apocalypse?

Gary 7"

I think there are a lot of intelligent people in public life you don't get through and ivy league law school being a idiot(at least not unless the school is named after you) I think the issue is lawyer while it some case like public defenders are very community minded people that work on principles  and you could say the same for prosecutors since neither really make that much money but both have strong personal reason to be there. Most lawyer that go to law school do it for the money and those are the kinds that we have in congress right now. They care about number 1 and thats all thats not to say they aren't smart but I do think it is to say they are uninformed and lean on there staffs to much rather than having a good grasp of the issues on there own.  It Scary how often  it turns on that Congressmen and women haven't even read what they are voting on. Scary stuff


I'm glad we have physicist running for congress I just hope he doesn't forget how to think on his own when he gets there. Freshmen congressmen tend to give up ghost early at once its gone theres not much hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wow! Intelligent people running for public office?<br />
What’s next? The apocalypse?</p>
<p>Gary 7&#8243;</p>
<p>I think there are a lot of intelligent people in public life you don&#8217;t get through and ivy league law school being a idiot(at least not unless the school is named after you) I think the issue is lawyer while it some case like public defenders are very community minded people that work on principles  and you could say the same for prosecutors since neither really make that much money but both have strong personal reason to be there. Most lawyer that go to law school do it for the money and those are the kinds that we have in congress right now. They care about number 1 and thats all thats not to say they aren&#8217;t smart but I do think it is to say they are uninformed and lean on there staffs to much rather than having a good grasp of the issues on there own.  It Scary how often  it turns on that Congressmen and women haven&#8217;t even read what they are voting on. Scary stuff</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad we have physicist running for congress I just hope he doesn&#8217;t forget how to think on his own when he gets there. Freshmen congressmen tend to give up ghost early at once its gone theres not much hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70808</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/17/sunday-mornin-politics-and-science/#comment-70808</guid>
		<description>The latest episode of History Channel's "The Universe" was about supernovae and covered 1987A relatively extensively. Maybe some educated people look down on this show and see it as a "puff piece". I think it's a pretty good show considering the alternatives. I had no idea Betelgeuse was (relatively) close to going supernova.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest episode of History Channel&#8217;s &#8220;The Universe&#8221; was about supernovae and covered 1987A relatively extensively. Maybe some educated people look down on this show and see it as a &#8220;puff piece&#8221;. I think it&#8217;s a pretty good show considering the alternatives. I had no idea Betelgeuse was (relatively) close to going supernova.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
