<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What star will blow up next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:11:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/comment-page-1/#comment-72318</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/#comment-72318</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, you were right about the SN1987A progenitor.  I got the name wrong.  (I probably got &quot;Sandoval&quot; from a Star Trek episode with a colonist leader of that name.)  The correct designation was Sanduleak -69 degrees 202.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, you were right about the SN1987A progenitor.  I got the name wrong.  (I probably got &#8220;Sandoval&#8221; from a Star Trek episode with a colonist leader of that name.)  The correct designation was Sanduleak -69 degrees 202.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/comment-page-1/#comment-72317</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/#comment-72317</guid>
		<description>StevoR writes:

[[&lt;i&gt;How about Procyon B and Sirius B - the white dwarf companions to theDogtsar &amp;little Dogstar? &lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Are they likely to result in supernova - esp. given Procyon A is already evolving towards gianthood? &lt;/i&gt;]]

No.  There is something called a &quot;type I supernova&quot; which involves matter from a red giant star falling onto a white dwarf, but the two stars have to be very close together -- Sirius A and B, and Procyon A and B, are separated by several AUs -- they are &quot;visual binaries.&quot;  A close binary of the type required would only be visible from Earth as a &quot;spectroscopic&quot; or &quot;eclipsing&quot; binary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StevoR writes:</p>
<p>[[<i>How about Procyon B and Sirius B - the white dwarf companions to theDogtsar &amp;little Dogstar? </i></p>
<p><i>Are they likely to result in supernova - esp. given Procyon A is already evolving towards gianthood? </i>]]</p>
<p>No.  There is something called a &#8220;type I supernova&#8221; which involves matter from a red giant star falling onto a white dwarf, but the two stars have to be very close together &#8212; Sirius A and B, and Procyon A and B, are separated by several AUs &#8212; they are &#8220;visual binaries.&#8221;  A close binary of the type required would only be visible from Earth as a &#8220;spectroscopic&#8221; or &#8220;eclipsing&#8221; binary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barton Paul Levenson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/comment-page-1/#comment-72316</link>
		<dc:creator>Barton Paul Levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/#comment-72316</guid>
		<description>BicycleRepairMan writes:

[[&lt;i&gt;If it is 20000 lightyears away, doesnt that mean its likely already blown up?(and we havent seen it yet) Is there any way to measure these things before the light reaches us?&lt;/i&gt;]]

Yes, it probably has blown up already, and we&#039;re just not seeing it yet.  No, there&#039;s no way to measure it before the light reaches us.  As far as present-day physics can tell, there is no easy way to send a signal faster than the speed of light.  (Technically you can do it by warping space or with a &quot;wormhole,&quot; but creating or using either takes enormous amounts of power and requires something called &quot;negative energy density matter&quot; which may not exist.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BicycleRepairMan writes:</p>
<p>[[<i>If it is 20000 lightyears away, doesnt that mean its likely already blown up?(and we havent seen it yet) Is there any way to measure these things before the light reaches us?</i>]]</p>
<p>Yes, it probably has blown up already, and we&#8217;re just not seeing it yet.  No, there&#8217;s no way to measure it before the light reaches us.  As far as present-day physics can tell, there is no easy way to send a signal faster than the speed of light.  (Technically you can do it by warping space or with a &#8220;wormhole,&#8221; but creating or using either takes enormous amounts of power and requires something called &#8220;negative energy density matter&#8221; which may not exist.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/comment-page-1/#comment-72315</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/#comment-72315</guid>
		<description>Procyon and Sirius B both have fairly large orbital radii- more than 9 AU- so they won&#039;t get engulfed when their companions become giants.  And neither is close to the critical mass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Procyon and Sirius B both have fairly large orbital radii- more than 9 AU- so they won&#8217;t get engulfed when their companions become giants.  And neither is close to the critical mass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/comment-page-1/#comment-72314</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/#comment-72314</guid>
		<description>Woilf-Rayet stars  (like Luminous Blue Variables eg. Eta Carinae) asre also meant theoretically to end up going supernova - but does anyone know if any supernova have been confirmed as coming from Wolf-Rayet (class W or WR) stars?

Incidentally, the name Sanduleak comes from the star catalogue by Nicholas Sanduleak (pron. &quot;Sand-you-lee-ak) of 1,272 hot blue stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud &amp; the stars observed spectral type  - pre-Supernova  - was B3 Ia  or bright supergiant of spectral type B3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woilf-Rayet stars  (like Luminous Blue Variables eg. Eta Carinae) asre also meant theoretically to end up going supernova &#8211; but does anyone know if any supernova have been confirmed as coming from Wolf-Rayet (class W or WR) stars?</p>
<p>Incidentally, the name Sanduleak comes from the star catalogue by Nicholas Sanduleak (pron. &#8220;Sand-you-lee-ak) of 1,272 hot blue stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud &amp; the stars observed spectral type  &#8211; pre-Supernova  &#8211; was B3 Ia  or bright supergiant of spectral type B3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/comment-page-1/#comment-72313</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/#comment-72313</guid>
		<description>Said # Barton Paul Levenson on 25 Feb 2008 at 7:44 am

&quot;tacitus writes:

[[I assume no one knows for sure that the type of star SN1987A was before it blew up ]]

Actually, I think they did know the type, though I don’t recall what it was. The star was catalogued as Sandoval -69 degrees, and I forget the index number, in one of the Magellanic Clouds, and I think it was a B-type blue supergiant.&quot;

Yeah - blue supergiant.

The precursor star that exploded as SN 1987 A was catalogued as Sanduleak (or Sk) - 69 202.

(See in &#039;End in Fire&#039; by Paul Murdin,Cambridge Uni. Press, 1990.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Said # Barton Paul Levenson on 25 Feb 2008 at 7:44 am</p>
<p>&#8220;tacitus writes:</p>
<p>[[I assume no one knows for sure that the type of star SN1987A was before it blew up ]]</p>
<p>Actually, I think they did know the type, though I don’t recall what it was. The star was catalogued as Sandoval -69 degrees, and I forget the index number, in one of the Magellanic Clouds, and I think it was a B-type blue supergiant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah &#8211; blue supergiant.</p>
<p>The precursor star that exploded as SN 1987 A was catalogued as Sanduleak (or Sk) &#8211; 69 202.</p>
<p>(See in &#8216;End in Fire&#8217; by Paul Murdin,Cambridge Uni. Press, 1990.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/comment-page-1/#comment-72312</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/24/what-star-will-blow-up-next/#comment-72312</guid>
		<description>How about Procyon B and Sirius B - the white dwarf companions to theDogtsar &amp;little Dogstar?

Are they likely to result in supernova - esp. given Procyon A is already evolving towards gianthood?

(BTW. There was, incidentally, an SF novel based on this for Sirius&#039;es &quot;Pup&quot; blowing up - &#039;Supernova&#039; by Roger MacBride Allen &amp; Eric Kotani, Avon books, 1991.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Procyon B and Sirius B &#8211; the white dwarf companions to theDogtsar &amp;little Dogstar?</p>
<p>Are they likely to result in supernova &#8211; esp. given Procyon A is already evolving towards gianthood?</p>
<p>(BTW. There was, incidentally, an SF novel based on this for Sirius&#8217;es &#8220;Pup&#8221; blowing up &#8211; &#8216;Supernova&#8217; by Roger MacBride Allen &amp; Eric Kotani, Avon books, 1991.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
