<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A swiftly UV galaxy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:56:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr Squid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/comment-page-1/#comment-72773</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/#comment-72773</guid>
		<description>The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope on Swift (affectionately called UVOT) is a modified Ritchey-Chrétien telescope with a 30 cm primary mirror, a focal ratio of f/12.7, a field of view of 17&#039; x 17&#039; and a pixel scale of 0.5&quot;/pixel.  It can observe from about 1600 Angstrom to about 6000 Angstrom.  It is one of three ultraviolet telescopes in orbit.  There are more details at .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope on Swift (affectionately called UVOT) is a modified Ritchey-Chrétien telescope with a 30 cm primary mirror, a focal ratio of f/12.7, a field of view of 17&#8242; x 17&#8242; and a pixel scale of 0.5&#8243;/pixel.  It can observe from about 1600 Angstrom to about 6000 Angstrom.  It is one of three ultraviolet telescopes in orbit.  There are more details at .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilgore Trout</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/comment-page-1/#comment-72772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilgore Trout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/#comment-72772</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explanation&#039;s,
Just to be sure I&#039;m understanding correctly. The haloed spot really is a very bright star, but it looks bigger and brighter than it should because it screws up the camera? Basically. And the streak through it is just a seam from putting the composite pictures together? I would have thought they would be at right angles to the picture, of course maybe they were before the picture was rotated and cropped.
Thanks again everyone, I&#039;m really enjoying this site. Just makes me wish it wasn&#039;t cold and cloudy at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation&#8217;s,<br />
Just to be sure I&#8217;m understanding correctly. The haloed spot really is a very bright star, but it looks bigger and brighter than it should because it screws up the camera? Basically. And the streak through it is just a seam from putting the composite pictures together? I would have thought they would be at right angles to the picture, of course maybe they were before the picture was rotated and cropped.<br />
Thanks again everyone, I&#8217;m really enjoying this site. Just makes me wish it wasn&#8217;t cold and cloudy at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Thomson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/comment-page-1/#comment-72771</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/#comment-72771</guid>
		<description>Also for the Pareidolia Files.  In the bigger version of the picture there are two eyes, a mouth and an ear in the nucleus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also for the Pareidolia Files.  In the bigger version of the picture there are two eyes, a mouth and an ear in the nucleus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regner Trampedach</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/comment-page-1/#comment-72770</link>
		<dc:creator>Regner Trampedach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/#comment-72770</guid>
		<description>DenverAstro,  1cm = 10mm (centi = 1/100, milli=1/1000).
Also units cannot be freely capitalized or decapitalized(?!?); 1mm is
1 millimeter, but 1Mm is 1 megameter (mega = 1,000,000 = million)
- that&#039;s a difference of a factor of 10^9 (billion in US lingo).
  In the end you do work out the numbers correctly, though,
with 30cm=300mm.  That&#039;s a pretty large refractor you have there,
by the way - 127mm... Should be pretty good for M33.
    Cheers,  Regner Trampedach</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DenverAstro,  1cm = 10mm (centi = 1/100, milli=1/1000).<br />
Also units cannot be freely capitalized or decapitalized(?!?); 1mm is<br />
1 millimeter, but 1Mm is 1 megameter (mega = 1,000,000 = million)<br />
- that&#8217;s a difference of a factor of 10^9 (billion in US lingo).<br />
  In the end you do work out the numbers correctly, though,<br />
with 30cm=300mm.  That&#8217;s a pretty large refractor you have there,<br />
by the way &#8211; 127mm&#8230; Should be pretty good for M33.<br />
    Cheers,  Regner Trampedach</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DenverAstro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/comment-page-1/#comment-72769</link>
		<dc:creator>DenverAstro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/#comment-72769</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see...a CM is 100 times larger than a MM, right? My refractor is 127mm which works out to about 5 inches, 300mm would then be about 12 inches in aperture, right? What kind of optics does this scope have and what is its focal length? This also says alot about what a telescope can do as you know better than I, Phil. I&#039;m just curious here. I didn&#039;t know that SWIFT had a scope like that on board. This is really cool, thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230;a CM is 100 times larger than a MM, right? My refractor is 127mm which works out to about 5 inches, 300mm would then be about 12 inches in aperture, right? What kind of optics does this scope have and what is its focal length? This also says alot about what a telescope can do as you know better than I, Phil. I&#8217;m just curious here. I didn&#8217;t know that SWIFT had a scope like that on board. This is really cool, thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/comment-page-1/#comment-72768</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/#comment-72768</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Andromeda Galaxy is male?!
Here I’ve been calling it “she” the whole time… I’m so embarrassed!&lt;/i&gt;

Obviously M33 is female, since it (she?) is making more stars.

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Andromeda Galaxy is male?!<br />
Here I’ve been calling it “she” the whole time… I’m so embarrassed!</i></p>
<p>Obviously M33 is female, since it (she?) is making more stars.</p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffersonian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/comment-page-1/#comment-72767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffersonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/26/a-swiftly-uv-galaxy/#comment-72767</guid>
		<description>&quot;For a fun game, think of things that CCD can stand for in the context of “streaking”.

Ha! Love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For a fun game, think of things that CCD can stand for in the context of “streaking”.</p>
<p>Ha! Love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
