<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The World Wide Telescope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:25:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-204679</link>
		<dc:creator>gman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/#comment-204679</guid>
		<description>ms dos was not and i repeat was not stable they added a can of raid with it for the bugs. go back and look at the ver. numbers. 3.0 3.1 3.2 ect... 4.0 4.1 4.2 ect... . we hadd lots of bugs back then. by the way a bug is just a undocumented feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ms dos was not and i repeat was not stable they added a can of raid with it for the bugs. go back and look at the ver. numbers. 3.0 3.1 3.2 ect&#8230; 4.0 4.1 4.2 ect&#8230; . we hadd lots of bugs back then. by the way a bug is just a undocumented feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-73625</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/#comment-73625</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just completed the installation of World Wide Telescope and rebooted ready to try it - it CRASHED straight away - exactly as you would expect from any Microsoft product. I think MS DOS was the only stable program they made..!

Well, when it&#039;s finally got working, perhaps it can be modified so we can fly spacecraft around this new virtual world with an assortment of laser weaponary, shields, ECM, missiles, hyperdrive, etc. just like the original computer game &quot;Elite&quot; for the Acorn BBC Micro. Those were the days. But can we have a minigun fitted this time please?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just completed the installation of World Wide Telescope and rebooted ready to try it &#8211; it CRASHED straight away &#8211; exactly as you would expect from any Microsoft product. I think MS DOS was the only stable program they made..!</p>
<p>Well, when it&#8217;s finally got working, perhaps it can be modified so we can fly spacecraft around this new virtual world with an assortment of laser weaponary, shields, ECM, missiles, hyperdrive, etc. just like the original computer game &#8220;Elite&#8221; for the Acorn BBC Micro. Those were the days. But can we have a minigun fitted this time please?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-73624</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/#comment-73624</guid>
		<description>First was wikisky, then googlesky, now ms-sky. What&#039;s the rush out there? New race to space?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First was wikisky, then googlesky, now ms-sky. What&#8217;s the rush out there? New race to space?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silver</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-73623</link>
		<dc:creator>silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/#comment-73623</guid>
		<description>How is this different from Celestia some of you ask? Well, watch the damn video then and you will know. Plus all this MS bashing is damn annoying you narrow minded people. How about this, think of this product as some new product from a company you don&#039;t know. It will make you happier and more open minded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this different from Celestia some of you ask? Well, watch the damn video then and you will know. Plus all this MS bashing is damn annoying you narrow minded people. How about this, think of this product as some new product from a company you don&#8217;t know. It will make you happier and more open minded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-73622</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/#comment-73622</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, the topic of this entry isn&#039;t &quot;Microsoft Windows, discuss.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, the topic of this entry isn&#8217;t &#8220;Microsoft Windows, discuss.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClanRewired</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-73621</link>
		<dc:creator>ClanRewired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/#comment-73621</guid>
		<description>Sounds like some Frippertronics playing in the background, maybe some reusage of the sounds Fripp created for Microsoft&#039;s Vista?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like some Frippertronics playing in the background, maybe some reusage of the sounds Fripp created for Microsoft&#8217;s Vista?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/comment-page-1/#comment-73620</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/02/29/the-world-wide-telescope/#comment-73620</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Re: “Microsoft builds good operating systems”; Something that takes five minutes to boot (only three months after a fresh install) is not a good operating system.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How did you manage that?  No matter how screwed up I got windows it never got took more than 2 or 3 minutes to boot, and that was usually cut down to 30 seconds to a minute by shutting down unnecessary auto-start software..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Re: “Microsoft builds good operating systems”; Something that takes five minutes to boot (only three months after a fresh install) is not a good operating system.</p></blockquote>
<p>How did you manage that?  No matter how screwed up I got windows it never got took more than 2 or 3 minutes to boot, and that was usually cut down to 30 seconds to a minute by shutting down unnecessary auto-start software..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
