<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politreks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:52:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GaterNate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/comment-page-1/#comment-75780</link>
		<dc:creator>GaterNate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/#comment-75780</guid>
		<description>Thank you Joe Meils for your polite and informative reply. I will give it another try next time there&#039;s a Firefly marathon on the Sci-fi channel.

And thanks to Quiet Desperation as well. I hope it is, in fact, fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Joe Meils for your polite and informative reply. I will give it another try next time there&#8217;s a Firefly marathon on the Sci-fi channel.</p>
<p>And thanks to Quiet Desperation as well. I hope it is, in fact, fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Meils</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/comment-page-1/#comment-75779</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Meils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/#comment-75779</guid>
		<description>When Firefly first came on, I was sooo ready to hate the show. A space western? A ship running on an engine that looks like a combination washing machine and jet engine? Ha! But then... I watched a little more. The characters, as in most of Josh Whedons work, were hypnotic. Then things started to make sense: this was all taking place in a solar system with hundreds of teraformed planets. No warp drive, no teleporters, no aliens. It was almost the anti-Trek. As such, it told stories about these people who build a life together, and who cherish freedom more than taking advantage of living in an advanced society that curtails your opportunities.

Sure. Tons of scientific errors. Like every other sci fi show on TV. (Except maybe the NASA channel) But they were telling us some damn good stories.

That&#039;s the appeal of Firefly. It was something other than the sensory dully conformity of Roddenberry&#039;s universe. (Same with the much missed and lamented Farscape.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Firefly first came on, I was sooo ready to hate the show. A space western? A ship running on an engine that looks like a combination washing machine and jet engine? Ha! But then&#8230; I watched a little more. The characters, as in most of Josh Whedons work, were hypnotic. Then things started to make sense: this was all taking place in a solar system with hundreds of teraformed planets. No warp drive, no teleporters, no aliens. It was almost the anti-Trek. As such, it told stories about these people who build a life together, and who cherish freedom more than taking advantage of living in an advanced society that curtails your opportunities.</p>
<p>Sure. Tons of scientific errors. Like every other sci fi show on TV. (Except maybe the NASA channel) But they were telling us some damn good stories.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the appeal of Firefly. It was something other than the sensory dully conformity of Roddenberry&#8217;s universe. (Same with the much missed and lamented Farscape.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/comment-page-1/#comment-75778</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/#comment-75778</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I would loooooove it if someone would explain to me the appeal of Firefly. &lt;/i&gt;

It was fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I would loooooove it if someone would explain to me the appeal of Firefly. </i></p>
<p>It was fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaiYeves</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/comment-page-1/#comment-75777</link>
		<dc:creator>KaiYeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/#comment-75777</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but is he a Star Wars fan? If not, I don&#039;t know what the other kids see in him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but is he a Star Wars fan? If not, I don&#8217;t know what the other kids see in him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calli Arcale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/comment-page-1/#comment-75776</link>
		<dc:creator>Calli Arcale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/#comment-75776</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with John F Kennedy and Chip -- B5 fandom would be a better indicator of a politician&#039;s quality than Trek fandom, all else being equal.  ;-)

Mind you, Jerry Doyle (Security Chief Michael Garibaldi) did run for Senate in California.  Alas, he did not win.

Of course, I&#039;m the sort of nerd who thinks it&#039;s even MORE important to ask -- which of the candidates are Whovians?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with John F Kennedy and Chip &#8212; B5 fandom would be a better indicator of a politician&#8217;s quality than Trek fandom, all else being equal.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Mind you, Jerry Doyle (Security Chief Michael Garibaldi) did run for Senate in California.  Alas, he did not win.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m the sort of nerd who thinks it&#8217;s even MORE important to ask &#8212; which of the candidates are Whovians?  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moose</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/comment-page-1/#comment-75775</link>
		<dc:creator>Moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/#comment-75775</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;John W Kennedy&lt;/b&gt;: &lt;i&gt;To return to the original point, “Firefly” was canceled because it was expensive to make and appealed to only a few fans, even though those who did like it were wildly enthusiastic.&lt;/i&gt;

It was canceled because Fox was looking for another X-Files to magically appear, while completely botching the homeopathic quantities of marketing there was. If Firefly wasn&#039;t wildly successful out of the gate, it was canned. Like so many other shows on Fox, some good, some not so good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>John W Kennedy</b>: <i>To return to the original point, “Firefly” was canceled because it was expensive to make and appealed to only a few fans, even though those who did like it were wildly enthusiastic.</i></p>
<p>It was canceled because Fox was looking for another X-Files to magically appear, while completely botching the homeopathic quantities of marketing there was. If Firefly wasn&#8217;t wildly successful out of the gate, it was canned. Like so many other shows on Fox, some good, some not so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/comment-page-1/#comment-75774</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/09/politreks/#comment-75774</guid>
		<description>Jens, you are a Reaver and I claim my £5.

B.A., I appreciate your enlightening our darkness about the scary way your country is heading back into mediaevalism.  Keep up the good work in both that and astronomy.  :-D

P.S. Mal&#039;s tatt. is real...  ;-)
--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jens, you are a Reaver and I claim my £5.</p>
<p>B.A., I appreciate your enlightening our darkness about the scary way your country is heading back into mediaevalism.  Keep up the good work in both that and astronomy.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>P.S. Mal&#8217;s tatt. is real&#8230;  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
