DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Phobos up close and very personal
Skeptics Circle #84 »

Laser > GRB

Wow: New Scientist is reporting that scientists have created a laser that pound for pound is the brightest light source in the Universe.

It’s a petawatt laser, which is incredibly powerful (one petawatt is 1000 terawatts; peta is a prefix people will get to know in a year or two once terabyte drives prove too small to store very many illegally downloaded BluRay movies). The light of the laser is sent out in a very brief pulse, which has all that energy packed into it. So it’s short-duration, but incredibly bright. It’s actually got more intensity (energy per square centimeter) crammed into the pulse than a gamma-ray burst beam, which is insanely powerful.

This sort of thing has lots of uses in astronomy, oddly. It creates so much energy that it can be used to model what happens when a lot of energy slams into matter as it does in a supernova or GRB. It’s not well-understood what happens when matter absorbs energy on that scale, so it will be a useful test on theories.

Plus, it’s just cool. Chris Knight would be proud.

Tip o’ the heavily shielded goggles to BABloggee Dave, Just Dave.

Share

April 10th, 2008 8:00 AM by Phil Plait in Cool stuff, Science | 38 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

38 Responses to “Laser > GRB”

  1. 1.   Chris Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:14 am

    I’d like to say, “you’ll shoot your eye out!” More likely you’ll just vaporize your whole head.

  2. 2.   Doc Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:15 am

    But can it make popcorn? How about really big swiss cheese?

  3. 3.   Charles Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:25 am

    When that movie came out, I had a YAG laser in my lab that was exactly the same one used as a prop in the film.

    We used to laugh at how they claimed they could get so much power out of a cavity so small. But hey, it was the 1980s and things have improved since then. The laws of physics do still apply, however.

  4. 4.   Rob P. Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:26 am

    “Short duration” seems to be something of an understatement. The article says that the pulse is only 100 femtoseconds.

  5. 5.   Improbus Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:41 am

    This is God, Kent. I know what you have been doing.

  6. 6.   Anne Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:47 am

    Total energy per pulse: 10 J. Whoopty-do. But they did manage to make the pulse really short, which is kind of neat.

  7. 7.   PsyberDave Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:47 am

    At first I envisioned the lab browning out the entire surrounding metropolitan area when they flipped it on. I imagined what the electric bill might be. Then I saw how short the pulse was. That is a seriously short burst they have going on.

    But then it gets me thinking about the energy that places like CERN, Fermilab and the Large Hadron Collider use (or *will*l use). Can anyone enlighten me (no pun intended)?

  8. 8.   madge Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:52 am

    @PsyberDave.
    They better have plenty coins for the metre! Or a frack of a lot of solar panels!
    First message SETI will receive will say “Turn that !*%^? light out!”

  9. 9.   viggen Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 9:07 am

    10 J per pulse

    Actually, the article said 200 J per pulse. As Rob said, about 100 fs (143 fs by my figuring).

    I think they may be overstating their case somewhat: lots of processes that exist in this universe are on longer time scales than that. Still, it’s plenty of power to see some incredible phenomenology. Achieving such a power is really cool and they will probably be able to intensify it yet as they decrease pulse duration. If I remember correctly, there are guys around here (between NIST and JILA in Boulder) that are getting close to attosecond pulses, which would increase this laser’s power by more than a hundred times.

  10. 10.   Pocket Nerd Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 9:12 am

    “All you’d need is a big spinning mirror and you could vaporize a human target from space!”

  11. 11.   Gareth Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 9:21 am

    Cool. We’re well on the way to converting the Earth into our very own Death Star then. Which planet shall we blow up first?

  12. 12.   drbuzz0 Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 9:55 am

    I can think of some way better ways to help out astronomy with this. How about they shoot it at Rich Hoaglund or something?

  13. 13.   Jacco Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 10:04 am

    By my calculations, a pulse length of 100 femtoseconds means that the light “beam” is only 0.03 millimeters long – about the width of a human hair. That is a seriously short pulse!

  14. 14.   DPA Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 10:12 am

    hahah now that was an incredibly geeky old school reference. I actually just watched that a couple weeks ago.

  15. 15.   Todd W. Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 10:40 am

    @Gareth

    “Which planet shall we blow up first?”

    If I wasn’t so fond of Mars, I would say a preemptive strike against it would be best. Can’t let Marvin take Earth out of the way just to improve his view of Venus.

  16. 16.   Ginger Yellow Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 10:47 am

    I think Brian Cox said that the LHC will use 150MW at full power, but that includes the magnets and the supercomputers. Wikipedia (pinch of salt and all that) says: “The size of the LHC constitutes an exceptional engineering challenge with unique safety issues. While running, the total energy stored in the magnets is 10 GJ, and in the beam 725 MJ.”

  17. 17.   J. D. Mack Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 10:54 am

    Why would the kid from The Brady Bunch be proud? ; )

    J. D.

  18. 18.   Michael Lonergan Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 10:54 am

    @Gareth: I vote the Twin Moons of Uranus.

    BTW, can this be used to signal ET?

  19. 19.   Bolo Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 10:59 am

    “It creates so much energy…”

    You mean, “so much power.” The energy is likely to be extremely low, while the power very high–the advantage of having a brief pulse. :)

  20. 20.   Wayne Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 11:30 am

    Cool, I’m glad they got it going full power. I was at a talk recently by one of the guys in charge of this thing, and he said they were “very close”.

    To follow up on Jacco’s statement, the guy said that the length of the beam was comparable to its width, so they are making “light bullets”. He used that phrase several times, and I think it’s a good way to think about these pulses.

  21. 21.   Blu-Ray-Ven Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 11:30 am

    “peta is a prefix people will get to know in a year or two once terabyte drives prove too small to store very many illegally downloaded BluRay movies”

    people better not illegally download me, thats rude

  22. 22.   Carey Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    Ow. Could you please warn us before you do that again? Thank you.

    The People of Haleakale

  23. 23.   Steve Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    This may be the wrong place for this but…….

    Sure it’s powerful, but can it be mounted on the head of a shark?

  24. 24.   Charles Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 1:28 pm

    I find it really ironic that the Google ad is for high power laser pointers.

  25. 25.   Joshua Zucker Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    Is “more intensity (energy per square centimeter)” really true, or is it supposed to be “more intensity (energy per square centimeter per second)” or equivalently “(power per square centimeter)”?

  26. 26.   Scott G. Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 1:57 pm

    My wife’s comment:
    Phenomenal cosmic power! Itty bitty living space! (Thanks, Genie!)

  27. 27.   Grant Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    So… is it like lasing a stick of dynamite?

    Does it get field under “H” for “Toy”?

    …wait, one more…

    Do the designers have this dream where they’re standing on top of a pyramid wearing these sun-god robes while millions of naked women scream and throw little pickles at them?

    Why am I the only one who has that dream?

  28. 28.   Edward Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    What is a femto second? Iam lost below micro.

  29. 29.   Jasso Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 3:25 pm

    Edward-

    Starting from deci:

    deci 10^-1
    centi 10^-2
    milli 10^-3
    micro 10^-6
    nano 10^-9
    pico 10^-12
    femto 10^-15
    atto 10^-18
    zepto 10^-21
    yocto 10^-24

  30. 30.   Davidlpf Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 3:57 pm

    People who should not be allowed to use this laser Homer Simpson, Adam Savage, Tim Allen.

  31. 31.   Ed Davies Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 4:09 pm

    “BTW, can this be used to signal ET?”

    Probably.

    http://seti.harvard.edu/oseti/index.html

  32. 32.   Michael Lonergan Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 7:17 pm

    Grant said:
    “Do the designers have this dream where they’re standing on top of a pyramid wearing these sun-god robes while millions of naked women scream and throw little pickles at them?”

    No, that’s my dream. They’re not screaming. They are laughing. Oh, the little pickles… well never mind about that.

  33. 33.   Gavin Flower Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 11:59 pm

    I don’t think that ‘the heavily shielded goggles’ would help protect you against a direct hit from that laser!

  34. 34.   drksky Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 12:37 am

    “I don’t think that ‘the heavily shielded goggles’ would help protect you against a direct hit from that laser!”

    I can’t help help myself:

    “Ze goggles, ze do nothing!”

  35. 35.   Mike Peel Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 1:46 am

    Apologies for being nit-picky, but don’t you mean the _known_ universe, i.e. that which use Earthlings have seen? I’d hate to be on this planet if some extraterrestrial civilization thought “Ha! So they think they have the brightest light source in the universe! We’ll show them!”, followed up by a demonstration…

  36. 36.   Alex Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 10:04 am

    The had a Pwatt laser years ago…. Call me when you get to 1000 P watt, atto sec., ultra chirped, kilo beam fusion.

  37. 37.   DaveKan Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    Yeah, but can it hammer a six inch spike through a board with its…

  38. 38.   defectiverobot Says:
    April 12th, 2008 at 7:46 am

    “Welcome to Bad Astronomy’s ‘Skeptologists on Ice!’”

    or

    Ben Stein: “I’ve been giving myself shock treatments.”
    PZ Myers: “Up the voltage.”

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us