DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« No, it’s *not* the smallest exoplanet found!
Carnival of Space #49 »

Titanic GRB still going strong

GRB080319b, the explosion that shook astronomers by getting bright enough to be seen with the naked eye, is still going strong. Hubble snapped this image three weeks after the explosion:

Incredibly, even after that time the GRB afterglow is still brighter than its host galaxy! This was truly an incredible event. I imagine any potential aliens in that galaxy — at least between us and the burst — are just so much vapor now. Of course, you can think of this event as having happened 7.5 billion years ago, so it’s unlikely that there are any alien civilizations around to be destroyed (as I mentioned in an earlier post, heavy metals were rarer back then, so planets would probably have been deficient in elements like iron, calcium, zinc, and so on). Maybe whole planets-full of microbes were zapped, though.

GRBs emit their light in beams like a flashlight, which is why they are so bright even from so maddeningly far away. But this one was so bright that astronomers were at first a little baffled. Was this really an astonishingly luminous event, or did the beam from the GRB happen to be perfectly aimed at us? Did it hit a bulls-eye?

In fact, it’s thought that this truly was an incredibly luminous event intrinsically, and that was due to the beam being unusually tightly focused. It also was aimed right at us, making it look even brighter.

What’s fun to think about is how many other GRBs have been like this one? Probably not many, actually, so it was good for us that we happened to have the Swift satellite operating when the GRB went off. That allowed us to observe the explosion in near real-time with bigger and more sensitive telescopes, and in turn learn more about these incredible explosions on the dim edge of the Universe.

And I’ll add that this couldn’t have happened at a better time for me: I was able to edit the proofs of my book to include GRB 080319b! I had talked about an earlier burst originally, but substituted this one in for it. I’m glad the timing worked out so well.

Share

April 10th, 2008 4:26 PM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, DeathfromtheSkies!, NASA, Pretty pictures, Science | 19 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

19 Responses to “Titanic GRB still going strong”

  1. 1.   Superstring Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 5:55 pm

    I wonder what Halton Arp would have to say about this….

    .

  2. 2.   Jack Hagerty Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 6:00 pm

    The BA says: “I had talked about an earlier burst originally, but substituted this one in for it. I’m glad the timing worked out so well.”

    Glad the universe is in sync with your book. All I got to squeeze in at the last second was the fact that Fox is remaking “Day the Earth Stood Still” :-(

    - Jack

  3. 3.   Kevin F. Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    Mayhap this was the “Core Explosion” from Larry Niven’s Known Space Universe. :D

  4. 4.   Ginger Yellow Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 6:57 pm

    So what are we going to learn from this? What are the many research projects in the GRB field?

  5. 5.   Shaun Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:18 pm

    Judging from the Wikipedia article, these things are friggin scary. Still, if one hit us head on with enough juice to trigger extinction events, I wonder if I could get to that hemisphere fast enough to watch the biggest light show in the universe.

    /badastronomy.com is one of the Wikipedia references on the subject of GRBS. :D

  6. 6.   Daniel Fischer Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 8:24 pm

    The first paper you link to actually states that the energy of that GRB was not extraordinary at all and that it may even have been underluminous: It all depends on the opening angle of the jet which is unexpectedly hard to pin down in this case (the paper discusses several scenarios fitting the data).

    The 2nd paper linked to actually comes from supporters of a fringe model of GRBs; it’s supporters are quick to make strong statements …

  7. 7.   RayCeeYa Says:
    April 10th, 2008 at 10:09 pm

    Sweet now we just need to see a few dozen more to find out how common these superluminous GRBs are.

    Then we can worry, or not depending on what the data says.

  8. 8.   slang Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 12:50 am

    “What’s fun to think about is how many other GRBs have been like this one? Probably not many, actually, so it was good for us that we happened to have the Swift satellite operating when the GRB went off.”

    That would be a huge coincidence, depending on what you mean with “not many”, of course. If we, in our short period of telescope usage, see a transient event in the universe, it is safe to assume that it’s very unlikely to be something unique or rare (in astronomical sense).

    As is said about gravitational lensing, http://tinyurl.com/48r4ba : “[...] one should remember that the Universe is large enough that unlikely things happen really quite often.”

  9. 9.   Adria Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 2:36 am

    3 weeks after the event … and 2 weeks and 2 days after the first paper on the event was submitted. I’m thinking this field might be a bit too competitive for me.

  10. 10.   Torbjörn Larsson, OM Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 4:27 am

    Maybe whole planets-full of microbes were zapped, though.

    Perhaps, but that would likely be harder too. Speculations of early non-organic or organic catalysts consisting of iron-sulfur surfaces still found in simple proteins or about the possible need for other metals in more complex monocellular organisms points to carbon only compounds as an added constraint for evolution.

    A constraint that evolution would in all likelihood eventually circumvent, of course. [And I'm agnostic about the quality of the specific study I linked to.]

  11. 11.   NoAstronomer Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 6:16 am

    “What’s fun to think about is how many other GRBs have been like this one?”

    What I like to think about is how many other GRBs occur that we never see – because they’re not aimed at us. We seem to see a lot of them and yet we probably observe 1/1000th, or less, of all the GRBs. Which would seem to indicate that these things are popping all over the place.

  12. 12.   YinYang0564 Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 6:38 am

    Now, go away or I will taunt you a second time!

  13. 13.   Mr. LAME Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 7:44 am

    another dimension signal
    or our future tehcnology say hello to us ???
    nothing is imposible

  14. 14.   Edward Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 9:49 am

    Will the gamma rays eventually reach us in 7.5 billion years?
    Or will they diminish to a point that is inconsequential?

  15. 15.   Barton Paul Levenson Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 10:02 am

    Edward, the gamma rays are reaching us now. They’re not intense enough to do any damage.

  16. 16.   Ken B Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 10:49 am

    So, anyone know how “narrow” the GRB would be? Even if it were confined to a beam of 0.001 degrees, that would still be over 130,000 light years across after traveling 7.5 billion light years.

  17. 17.   spicoli Says:
    April 11th, 2008 at 9:28 pm

    I wonder if a GRB event could cook my frozen pizza?

  18. 18.   Kevin F. Says:
    April 12th, 2008 at 7:15 am

    I just had a thought about this Gamma Ray Burst and Extraterrestrial Life.

    If we want to call attention to ourselves, we should send a signal out (you know, like the Prime Numbers, etc), in the direction this burst is headed – right now. We know that any race intelligent enough to have their own version of SWIFT has the capability to detect our signal.

    If indeed there is another race that picks up on this we know they’ll be looking in our direction.

    Just a thought.

  19. 19.   tony Says:
    May 26th, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    Gergg Easterbrook of ESPN has an interesting view regarding these GRBs. He sees potential evidence of doomsday-type weapons used by ancient and far-off civilizations in their death throes locked in a deadly war agaisnt a powerful and destructive enemy. Perhaps his view is more science fiction than science, but nevertheless amusing.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us