DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Europe: Day 2
Dark matter detected? »

Europe: Day 1

Hmmm. Something went wrong with my blog. It says this got posted on the 18th, but it doesn’t actually appear anywhere on my page! So this will be seen after the Day 2 post, but it’s actually from before. Sorry about this bloggy time travel.

I’m in England! How cool is that?

Pretty frakkin’ cool.

I arrived a bit late, held up over Heathrow airport (shocker). But here’s how I knew I was in England:

Turns out I was neither authorised nor authorized, but I knew that it was missing the "z", and, worse, if I mentioned it to someone, they would say it wasn’t missing a "zed".

Anyway, after an hour in line to show my passport and a short ride through London (on the "tube"), I met up with the lovely Gia, who escorted me home. After knockin’ about for a time, we went over to the headquarters for Nature magazine so I could record a soapbox speech for their podcast (I’ll have more on that when it goes live), and Gia could do some voiceovers for them.

On our way over, who did we see but Gia’s husband Professor Doctor Brian Cox! Here they are texting each other, because modern Londoners never talk anymore:

After all that we went to the BA/James Randi/Nature magazine meetup at a pub called the Rugby Tavern, and it was great! Lots of good folks showed up, including some old skeptic friends (hi Sid, Mark, Med Tech, Tom Siefert) as well as a new friend, Iszi, who is a skeptic… and you’ll be seeing more of her later. Heh heh.

Anyway, after much jocularity it was time to head home. We took a taxi, and I saw Big Ben, the Millennium Wheel, Parliament, St. Paul’s cathedral, and some other British stuff. Tomorrow we head off to Geneva and CERN. That’s going to be amazing. I have no clue when I’ll be back on the ‘net, but I’ll keep trying to post as often as I can. Bear in mind, too, that I am currently seven hours ahead of Boulder time, and when we go to Geneva it’ll be eight hours, so posts may go up at funny times. Stupid round planet.

Share

April 20th, 2008 1:26 PM by Phil Plait in Cool stuff | 33 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

33 Responses to “Europe: Day 1”

  1. 1.   Richard Eis Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 2:15 pm

    The Americans nicked all our Z’s. Damn them…We had to replace all our poor broken words with S’s. Luckily the Sebras escaped unharmed.

  2. 2.   pajh Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 2:27 pm

    Actually `authorized’ is good UK English. Etymologically speaking both the -ised or -ized endings are correct. The OED recommends use of -ized because it has the benefit of actually looking how it’s supposed to sound. Even the Americans can be right sometimes.

  3. 3.   wintermute Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 2:28 pm

    “Heath Row airport”

    That’s “Heathrow”. One word.

  4. 4.   The Bad Astronomer Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    Oops! Fixed, thanks.

  5. 5.   Thomas Siefert Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    I’ve lived down the road from the parliament for more than two years now and I’ve never seen Big Ben, but I’ve heard it a lot. ;-)

    Nice finally meeting you in person BA.
    I did not realize that it was Iszi there or I would had her sign something too instead of babbling on about Adam Ant. :-)

  6. 6.   Fritriac Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 2:54 pm

    So you had a camera license to make those pics? Huh … ;-)

    http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=3549441

  7. 7.   Jeffersonian Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    “and I saw Big Ben”
    Saw Clock Tower, more likely. Saw the bell, unlikely. Heard it, probably. ;

    http://www.whitechapelbellfoundry.co.uk/bigben.htm

  8. 8.   Gia Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    “I’ve lived down the road from the parliament for more than two years now and I’ve never seen Big Ben, but I’ve heard it a lot.”
    “Saw Clock Tower, more likely. Saw the bell, unlikely. Heard it, probably.”

    blahblahblah

    Bloody pedants. ;)

  9. 9.   Jewel Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 4:26 pm

    Yeah yeah, I know the bell is actually what is called Big Ben and not the clock tower, but it’s in common enough use that I refer to the tower as Big Ben as well.

    Phil, if you’re a Salvadore Dali fan there is at least one melting clock statue on south bank just down the river from the London Eye. I was there last weekend and got a picture of it with the Big Ben clock tower visible in the background across the river. Sadly, I didn’t have more time to explore London. Really only a day.

    When we landed at Heathrow, we were amazed at just how casual things were going through customs. We went through the door marked “nothing to declare” because well we had nothing to declare and we didn’t have to actually talk to anyone. It was a bit surreal.

  10. 10.   Kimpatsu Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    Did you see the Ood erturn whilst you were in London, Phil?

  11. 11.   Lugosi Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 5:24 pm

    When you consider that America started off populated largely by English settlers, it’s amazing how much our two languages have diverged over just the last 300 years or so. It’s almost like, well, our languages have evolved in different directions, though I’m sure some will argue that these differences are the product of intelligent design.
    But the real question is, when did the Brits start talking funny?

  12. 12.   Russ Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    Take note of the debate going on over at lgf.

    http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/29682_Steins_Expelled_Exposed

    Many on the right including Charles Johnson and Zombie would like to see the ID’ers rightly expelled.

  13. 13.   JB of Brisbane Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 6:12 pm

    I remember reading somewhere that the American spelling for words such as color, humor, neighbor, harbor, etc. is actually the old English spelling of such words. Sometime after the voyage of the Mayflower, and maybe even after the revolution, the “mother country” went through a period of Francophilia, during which the modern English spelling of colour, humour, neighbour, harbour, etc. appeared. I suspect this is also when an ax became an axe. Despite this convention spreading throughout the Empire, it never made it across “the pond” to the Americas, much like the Metric/SI system of measurements today.

    Americans may say “zeebra”, but the English do not say “zedbra”.

  14. 14.   Thomas Siefert Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    I call it Big Ben too, then all people know what you are talking about and you involve the pedants in the conversation as well. :-)

    ZedZed Top is still a great band.

  15. 15.   Dave Hall Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 9:31 pm

    A lot of the evolutionary differences between British and American English can be attributed to–ahem–Intellegent Design. Well, maybe not intellegent per se, but intentional.

    American English did evolve due to many local influences. Immigrants to the colonies included those of French, Spanish, Dutch, Scots, and German origins. Many words from those languages, as well as a healthy helping of Native American words, and a dash of West African influence caused the English to change considerably between the first settlements just after 1607 and the American Revolution 168 years later.

    The design part came in later. Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson both toyed with the idea of simplified spelling. Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language, published in 1755, was well known by the end of the American Revolution. With independance came the desire for more than just political change.

    The new nation adopted a new monetary system as well as different weight and measurement standards (When was the last time you cut an ell of cloth or the doctor weighed you in stone or pennyweight?) By the time Noah Webster published his American Dictionary in 1828, there had been several movements to make American English officially distinct from the old colonial tongue. These included plans to simplify spelling and, whenever possible, adopt Norman French-influenced words instead of Anglo Saxon based ones. (Another way to stick it to the English and give a nod to our new best friends, the French.)

    The rest, as they say, is history.

  16. 16.   Chip Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 10:57 pm

    BA wrote: “Bear in mind, too, that I am currently seven hours ahead of Boulder time, and when we go to Geneva it’ll be eight hours, so posts may go up at funny times.”

    Maybe if you get the folks at CERN to transmit your blog updates inside the Large Hadron Collider, your posts will be arrive here — before you left Boulder! ;)

    Actually, in my country of “Chipozodia”, posting a message “in funny times” means you have to send it whilst Turner Classic Movies is airing a Marx Brothers movie. But I realize that’s not what you meant. Looking forward to your next update! :D

  17. 17.   vbloke Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 11:47 pm

    Nice to see you again Phil.

    Just so you know, as excited as you were to see Canary Wharf the other day, I have a clear view of it from my flat. I watched the whole Dalek / Cyberman invasion as it happened. It was very exciting.

  18. 18.   Andy Mak Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 12:38 am

    The reason it wasn’t missing a ‘zed’ was because in England (like Australia) We speak ENGLISH! Not American, which isn’t even close to real English…

  19. 19.   Doug Ellison Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 1:35 am

    I find people getting all riled about ‘real’ English or how Americans have ruined English hilarious. English is a mongrel language. We’ve stolen, bastardised, concatenated, bifurcated, derived, deviated, smashed, clashed, bashed, mashed, merged, splurged and generally ruined languages from most of Europe to end up with ‘Proper’ English. Criticism of others for continuing that pattern is unjustified and hypocritical.

    Eddie Izzard did a great documentary about it called ‘ Mongrel Nation’. Excellent viewing!

  20. 20.   csrster Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 2:13 am

    Andy … if you ever visit Boston, remember that a good way to make friends with the locals is to refer to the Freedom Trail as “The Treason Trail”.

  21. 21.   Dana Hunter Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 3:25 am

    “Stupid round planet.” ROTFLMAO! What, flat would be any better? ;-)

    You sound like you’re having a blast. Can’t wait for the next installment!

  22. 22.   overstroming Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 3:53 am

    BA, your posts have always been at funny times, perhaps now they’ll be at normal times for a change, even if they’re out of sequence.

    Perhaps that CERN thingy has caused a disturbance in the time space continuum…… oh never mind.

  23. 23.   Sue Mitchell Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 5:24 am

    Lugosi asked: “But the real question is, when did the Brits start talking funny?”

    Well duh! That would be after The Great Vowel Shift. :-D

    Here’s a thought:

    Dr. Brian Cox
    Dr. Brian May

    Two Brians
    Two musicians
    Two astro-docs.

    Hm…
    –

  24. 24.   PerryG Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 6:17 am

    Now your blog is “wibbly wobbly, timey whimey”.

  25. 25.   gia Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 10:24 am

    Here’s a thought:

    Dr. Brian Cox
    Dr. Brian May

    Two Brians
    Two musicians
    Two astro-docs.

    Hm…

    Actually *ahem* it’s Professor Brian Cox, to you. ;) Also, he’s a high energy particle physicist not an astrophysicist…. but I will say that I’ve never seen the two of them in the same room together…

    Hmmm.

  26. 26.   Quiet_Desperation Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 10:31 am

    BA: I’m in England! How cool is that?

    Um… don’t people do that every day?

    In fact, I believe there is a native population unless I have been seriously misinformed.

    (puzzled stare)

    Dana: What, flat would be any better?

    Better on two counts: no time zones, and the pure joy of tossing idiots off the edge.

    Andy Mak: “We speak ENGLISH! Not American, which isn’t even close to real English…

    Yes, yes, Andy. (QD pats Andy’s wittle head) If that’s important to you…

  27. 27.   Quiet_Desperation Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 10:34 am

    Actually, in my country of “Chipozodia”

    Wait… weren’t you annexed into the Desperation Compound? Or was that the Duchy Of Bill Smith?

    Man, we *really* have to update the property maps here at the Compound.

  28. 28.   John Paradox Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 11:11 am

    Two astro-docs.

    Wouldn’t that be a “pair o’ docs”?

    J/P=?

  29. 29.   JB of Brisbane Says:
    April 21st, 2008 at 9:06 pm

    @Thomas Siefert -

    It’s not ZedZed Top… it’s DoubleZed Top!
    Along with Blink One-Eight-Two and Gloria ESS-te-FAHN.

  30. 30.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    April 22nd, 2008 at 4:40 am

    OK, here’s the final word on the tower that houses Big Ben.

    The building to which the tower is attached is the Palace of Westminster. The palace contains the Houses of Parliament, but that is not the name of the building. The tower is St Stephen’s Tower. The clock, AFAIK, has no name. The large bell that is housed in St Stephen’s tower is called Big Ben.

    However, if you call it St Stephen’s tower, only a few people will know what you are talking about, so calling it “the Big Ben clock tower” (or “Big Ben’s clock tower”) is actually clearer.

    However, calling the tower Big Ben is just plain out-and-out wrong. Calling me a pedant will not change this fact.

    Here’s a picture of St Stephen’s Tower:
    http://www.artofthestate.co.uk/london_photos/st_stephens_tower.htm

  31. 31.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    April 22nd, 2008 at 4:52 am

    Doug Ellison said:
    “I find people getting all riled about ‘real’ English or how Americans have ruined English hilarious. English is a mongrel language. We’ve stolen, bastardised, concatenated, bifurcated, derived, deviated, smashed, clashed, bashed, mashed, merged, splurged and generally ruined languages from most of Europe to end up with ‘Proper’ English.”

    Quite right, Doug. I would recommend “Mother Tongue” by Bill Bryson, in which he uncovers that many of the “Americanisms” that are criticised in the UK actually started here, got shipped over the Atlantic, and then fell out of favour here.

    Since English has borrowed from so many other languages, the pronunciation of that last letter has remained “zed” over here (in common with several other European languages) and become “zee” in America. Thus, the name of that letter is pronounced one way in Europe and another way in America. If I can live with “zee” in Americans’ speech, I’m sure they can live with “zed” in Europeans’.

    Doug again:
    “Criticism of others for continuing that pattern is unjustified and hypocritical. ”

    I would qualify this, Doug. I agree with you up to a point, but if the change of usage obscures the meaning of a word, I would argue against it. English has become a worldwide lingua franca (I love the irony of that expression). To retain its value as a means of communication across all sorts of boundaries, it has to retain some measure of consistency. If, for instance, we had a word meaning one thing in Europe, another in America, yet another in Asia and so on, it will be bound to cause confusion.

    The same goes for spelling. Pronunciations are extremely idiosyncratic, but if the spelling is (mostly) consistent, people from different parts of the world can still use English to communicate. An example used by Bill Bryson was the word “girl”. In various parts of Britan and America, it is variously pronounced “gerl”, “gel”, “gurrul”, “goil”, “gal” and several others. But, by retaining its spelling, it remains comprehensible (most especially, of course, in written English).

  32. 32.   Thomas Siefert Says:
    April 22nd, 2008 at 8:56 am

    OK, hereâ??s the final word on the tower that houses Big Ben.

    No it’s not…

    The building to which the tower is attached is the Palace of Westminster. The palace contains the Houses of Parliament, but that is not the name of the building. The tower is St Stephenâ??s Tower. The clock, AFAIK, has no name. The large bell that is housed in St Stephenâ??s tower is called Big Ben.

    Wrong, it’s only known as “The Clock Tower” St. Stephens Tower is the middle tower.

    http://www.parliament.uk/about/images/exterior/ststephens.cfm

  33. 33.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    April 25th, 2008 at 10:06 am

    Hah! Serves me right for trusting internet resources. Thanks, Thomas.

    Still, Big Ben is the name of the bell, not the name of the tower.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us