<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Skeptologists trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:45:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/comment-page-2/#comment-83928</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/#comment-83928</guid>
		<description>Okay, watched the new promo. It certainly is better than the first one. The bottle with the block on it was a complete mystery what was trying to be demonstrated, and the &quot;Do you believe?&quot; question and rebuttal was a non-sequitor.

This promo did a better job of showing something about the content, and the motivations and interests of the people involved.

However, I still don&#039;t like the name.  Why not call yourselves, the Skeptonomists?  Skepterologists?  Skeptinators?  Skepticists?

I think any of the following would be better names:
The Skeptic Squad
De-mystifiers
Rational Review

And I&#039;m pretty bad at creative names.

Actually, 3 names I like but are already taken:
Exploring the Unknown
Is It Real?
The Real World</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, watched the new promo. It certainly is better than the first one. The bottle with the block on it was a complete mystery what was trying to be demonstrated, and the &#8220;Do you believe?&#8221; question and rebuttal was a non-sequitor.</p>
<p>This promo did a better job of showing something about the content, and the motivations and interests of the people involved.</p>
<p>However, I still don&#8217;t like the name.  Why not call yourselves, the Skeptonomists?  Skepterologists?  Skeptinators?  Skepticists?</p>
<p>I think any of the following would be better names:<br />
The Skeptic Squad<br />
De-mystifiers<br />
Rational Review</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m pretty bad at creative names.</p>
<p>Actually, 3 names I like but are already taken:<br />
Exploring the Unknown<br />
Is It Real?<br />
The Real World</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themadlolscientist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/comment-page-2/#comment-83927</link>
		<dc:creator>themadlolscientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/#comment-83927</guid>
		<description>Smash Lab. PFTHTHTHFFFBBBBTHTHLBTHT.

The thing that got me off on the wrong foot from the very beginning was the woman scientist&#039;s big clunky jewelry and loose hair hanging around just waiting to get caught in something. BOGUUUUUUS! It reminded me of the couple of years I spent as a teaching assistant for an undergrad lab course. I was constantly getting after my long-haired students to GET THAT HAIR OUT OF THE WAY! ARE YOU NUTS? DO YOU WANT IT TO CATCH FIRE? DO YOU WANT A BUNCH OF IT, NOT TO MENTION A PIECE OF YOUR SCALP, RIPPED OUT? Immediate turnoff.

I think I watched a total of 3 episodes after that. Between the ongoing hair problem, the questionable design and execution of the tests, and the noncohesiveness of the show itself..... well..... :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smash Lab. PFTHTHTHFFFBBBBTHTHLBTHT.</p>
<p>The thing that got me off on the wrong foot from the very beginning was the woman scientist&#8217;s big clunky jewelry and loose hair hanging around just waiting to get caught in something. BOGUUUUUUS! It reminded me of the couple of years I spent as a teaching assistant for an undergrad lab course. I was constantly getting after my long-haired students to GET THAT HAIR OUT OF THE WAY! ARE YOU NUTS? DO YOU WANT IT TO CATCH FIRE? DO YOU WANT A BUNCH OF IT, NOT TO MENTION A PIECE OF YOUR SCALP, RIPPED OUT? Immediate turnoff.</p>
<p>I think I watched a total of 3 episodes after that. Between the ongoing hair problem, the questionable design and execution of the tests, and the noncohesiveness of the show itself&#8230;.. well&#8230;.. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarrieP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/comment-page-2/#comment-83926</link>
		<dc:creator>CarrieP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/#comment-83926</guid>
		<description>www.whatstheharm.net - a comprehensive list of people that have been hurt or killed by psudeoscience.

Love the trailer. Absolutely love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whatstheharm.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatstheharm.net</a> &#8211; a comprehensive list of people that have been hurt or killed by psudeoscience.</p>
<p>Love the trailer. Absolutely love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/comment-page-2/#comment-83925</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/#comment-83925</guid>
		<description>Or relying on &quot;alternative&quot; medical treatment, or the power of prayer, in place of the real thing. Or etc., etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or relying on &#8220;alternative&#8221; medical treatment, or the power of prayer, in place of the real thing. Or etc., etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/comment-page-2/#comment-83924</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/#comment-83924</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t what to put words in Phil&#039;s mouth, but I think the reference to people dying probably has something to do with people deciding not to get their children vaccinated because they fear a vaccination/autism connection.  Kids can and will and die because of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t what to put words in Phil&#8217;s mouth, but I think the reference to people dying probably has something to do with people deciding not to get their children vaccinated because they fear a vaccination/autism connection.  Kids can and will and die because of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mapuser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/comment-page-2/#comment-83923</link>
		<dc:creator>mapuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/#comment-83923</guid>
		<description>We already have &quot;The UFO Hunters&quot;. Aren&#039;t they enough? (sigh)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We already have &#8220;The UFO Hunters&#8221;. Aren&#8217;t they enough? (sigh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/comment-page-2/#comment-83922</link>
		<dc:creator>fos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/04/22/new-skeptologists-trailer/#comment-83922</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait! It should be one of the best shows on TV! (One of the few worth watching!)

fos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait! It should be one of the best shows on TV! (One of the few worth watching!)</p>
<p>fos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
