Trust me, when the next president gets in I will very likely be ranting against that person as well. These people need watching, otherwise we get…well, we get what we currently have.

Do I have authority issues? Yup.

I’m glad we can agree that improvements are needed all around, and that we can have this kind of snappy, witty, repartee.

Respeck.

…a better class of candidates to lead this country.”

Then why are we arguing?

You should check out the definition of conspiracy; they even use small words that I could understand!

I didn’t claim that you said anything; you did, however, give a pretty good description of a conspiracy. I was lamely trying to use humor to expand on that idea.

I certainly agree that we need some sort of campaign finance reform (not just McCain-Feingold). And some teeth in our anti-trust laws. And some better government accountability. And a huge reduction in our bureaucracy. And … and…

…a better class of candidates to lead this country.

Our anti-trust laws are hardly laws at all. Just vague descriptions begging to be interpreted by whomever however they please.

It has EVERYTHING to do with campaign finance reform. Spare me the Limbaughesque straw men.

It’s very simple (I’ll use small words for you): politicians of both parties are loyal to their corporate sponsors more than they are the voters.

Got it? Nothing will be done to seriously enforce our anti-trust laws until we have real campaign finance reform. Why would it?

No iluminati, space aliens, or anything else you want to claim I said. Simple campaign finance reform.

I said nothing about conspiracies…you did.

You’ve got to stop. Because you DID say:

It has everything to do with 2 oil men in the White House…as well as an entire federal government, both parties, that has been bought and paid for by corporate lobbyists.

But that’s not a conspiracy.

Have a great day!