<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The angels have my phone award</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:56:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ipecac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/comment-page-1/#comment-88953</link>
		<dc:creator>Ipecac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/#comment-88953</guid>
		<description>Since someone mentioned her, I feel compelled to point out that Martha Jones is by far the most wonderfully, superfantastically beautiful of the Doctor&#039;s many companions.

And I agree completely about Blink.  What an absolute genius of an episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since someone mentioned her, I feel compelled to point out that Martha Jones is by far the most wonderfully, superfantastically beautiful of the Doctor&#8217;s many companions.</p>
<p>And I agree completely about Blink.  What an absolute genius of an episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moose</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/comment-page-1/#comment-88952</link>
		<dc:creator>Moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/#comment-88952</guid>
		<description>Chris, no, episodes are not usually that complicated. Time travel obviously plays a role in most episodes, but they don&#039;t usually go quite that far playing with paradoxes. Those are, after all, something the doctor tries to avoid. They&#039;re apparently dangerous.

This particular doctor does technobabble from time to time (wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey), but as Martha suggests, just smile and nod at appropriate intervals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, no, episodes are not usually that complicated. Time travel obviously plays a role in most episodes, but they don&#8217;t usually go quite that far playing with paradoxes. Those are, after all, something the doctor tries to avoid. They&#8217;re apparently dangerous.</p>
<p>This particular doctor does technobabble from time to time (wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey), but as Martha suggests, just smile and nod at appropriate intervals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Ferro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/comment-page-1/#comment-88951</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/#comment-88951</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;ve never watched a Dr. Who episode... I just read the Wikipedia entry for &quot;Blink&quot; and realized that I don&#039;t think I have the brain power available to understand the DW universe. Is it really that complicated all the time? Yikes!

CJSF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;ve never watched a Dr. Who episode&#8230; I just read the Wikipedia entry for &#8220;Blink&#8221; and realized that I don&#8217;t think I have the brain power available to understand the DW universe. Is it really that complicated all the time? Yikes!</p>
<p>CJSF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troglodyte</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/comment-page-1/#comment-88950</link>
		<dc:creator>Troglodyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/#comment-88950</guid>
		<description>UGH! I started watching Doctor Who a few weeks ago and I&#039;m in the middle of Season 2... Everyone keeps telling me that Blink is BETTER than &quot;The Empty Child&quot; and &quot;The Doctor Dances,&quot; and since those are in my top 5 list of TV episodes/movies, it&#039;s very hard for me to wait!

Out of Gas-- brilliant, but painful, especially if you watch it when you know the show is going to end in 6 episodes. Best written episode of Firefly, for sure, another favorite.

The only other TV episode that I can think of that&#039;s as good as &quot;The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances&quot; or &quot;Out of Gas&quot; is not sci-fi, but still awesome: &quot;Two Cathedrals&quot; from the West Wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UGH! I started watching Doctor Who a few weeks ago and I&#8217;m in the middle of Season 2&#8230; Everyone keeps telling me that Blink is BETTER than &#8220;The Empty Child&#8221; and &#8220;The Doctor Dances,&#8221; and since those are in my top 5 list of TV episodes/movies, it&#8217;s very hard for me to wait!</p>
<p>Out of Gas&#8211; brilliant, but painful, especially if you watch it when you know the show is going to end in 6 episodes. Best written episode of Firefly, for sure, another favorite.</p>
<p>The only other TV episode that I can think of that&#8217;s as good as &#8220;The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances&#8221; or &#8220;Out of Gas&#8221; is not sci-fi, but still awesome: &#8220;Two Cathedrals&#8221; from the West Wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/comment-page-1/#comment-88949</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/#comment-88949</guid>
		<description>Moffat not only won BAFTA. He won the Hugo Award for The Empty Child/Doctor Dances, another one for the Girl In The Fireplace and, if there is any justice, will take his third in a row for Blink, easily he best episode of the series.  This would be a run that would match Babylon 5 in its prime (although B5 was up against movies as well).

Bring back Sally Sparrow!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moffat not only won BAFTA. He won the Hugo Award for The Empty Child/Doctor Dances, another one for the Girl In The Fireplace and, if there is any justice, will take his third in a row for Blink, easily he best episode of the series.  This would be a run that would match Babylon 5 in its prime (although B5 was up against movies as well).</p>
<p>Bring back Sally Sparrow!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moose</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/comment-page-1/#comment-88948</link>
		<dc:creator>Moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/#comment-88948</guid>
		<description>I feel comfortable declaring that Catherine Tate&#039;s Donna Noble is the best Companion of the new series, so far. All have been good, but Donna&#039;s the best.

I say this because Donna Noble has a huge emotional range, plenty of depth, and she&#039;s strong enough to stand toe-to-toe against the Doctor if she thinks she has to.

Plus, Catherine Tate has a vast amount of (platonic) chemistry with David Tennant, and it shows up in their acting. They play off each other extremely well. (Same basic sort of thing you see when Colin Mochrie and Ryan Styles do improv together.) That precious scene where Donna and the Doctor spot each other through windows while eavesdropping on the Foster/Nanny is a great example of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel comfortable declaring that Catherine Tate&#8217;s Donna Noble is the best Companion of the new series, so far. All have been good, but Donna&#8217;s the best.</p>
<p>I say this because Donna Noble has a huge emotional range, plenty of depth, and she&#8217;s strong enough to stand toe-to-toe against the Doctor if she thinks she has to.</p>
<p>Plus, Catherine Tate has a vast amount of (platonic) chemistry with David Tennant, and it shows up in their acting. They play off each other extremely well. (Same basic sort of thing you see when Colin Mochrie and Ryan Styles do improv together.) That precious scene where Donna and the Doctor spot each other through windows while eavesdropping on the Foster/Nanny is a great example of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MandyDax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/comment-page-1/#comment-88936</link>
		<dc:creator>MandyDax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/13/the-angels-have-my-phone-award/#comment-88936</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Shawn and BA about that scene.  Totally caught me off guard and made me do a double take, too. XD

That rip-off of Catherine&#039;s award is horrible.  Stealing the People&#039;s Choice Award just gives the rude gesture to the entire voting population as well as to Catherine.  I&#039;m glad to see that she&#039;s getting it, after all, but still...

I really, really like the way Donna&#039;s been developing as a character in the first six episodes.  She has a way to get the Doctor to really open up in a way that he never has with any other companion.  Also, their dynamic is so fluid that everywhere they go, they&#039;re being mistaken as a couple.  The Doctor is getting constantly surprised by her, too.  Her ingenuity and ability to think in ways that the clinical and scientific minds of the Doctor and many of his past companions is really refreshing.  I think I like her so much because I could see myself in her shoes.  Kind of an ordinary person who could &quot;never go back to a normal life&quot; after seeing what&#039;s out there.  She&#039;s very human, too, and she&#039;s really filling the role of the someone that the Doctor needs.  If you want an excellent example of what I&#039;m talking about, just watch the scene in &quot;The Doctor&#039;s Daughter&quot; where she&#039;s ribbing him about Father Shock.

OH! Did you know that the title character in &quot;The Doctor&#039;s Daughter&quot; is &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doctor%27s_Daughter#Casting&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Doctor&#039;s daughter&lt;/a&gt;?  I happened to look it up because I read Moffett and thought of Moffat (didn&#039;t realize the spelling was different).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Shawn and BA about that scene.  Totally caught me off guard and made me do a double take, too. XD</p>
<p>That rip-off of Catherine&#8217;s award is horrible.  Stealing the People&#8217;s Choice Award just gives the rude gesture to the entire voting population as well as to Catherine.  I&#8217;m glad to see that she&#8217;s getting it, after all, but still&#8230;</p>
<p>I really, really like the way Donna&#8217;s been developing as a character in the first six episodes.  She has a way to get the Doctor to really open up in a way that he never has with any other companion.  Also, their dynamic is so fluid that everywhere they go, they&#8217;re being mistaken as a couple.  The Doctor is getting constantly surprised by her, too.  Her ingenuity and ability to think in ways that the clinical and scientific minds of the Doctor and many of his past companions is really refreshing.  I think I like her so much because I could see myself in her shoes.  Kind of an ordinary person who could &#8220;never go back to a normal life&#8221; after seeing what&#8217;s out there.  She&#8217;s very human, too, and she&#8217;s really filling the role of the someone that the Doctor needs.  If you want an excellent example of what I&#8217;m talking about, just watch the scene in &#8220;The Doctor&#8217;s Daughter&#8221; where she&#8217;s ribbing him about Father Shock.</p>
<p>OH! Did you know that the title character in &#8220;The Doctor&#8217;s Daughter&#8221; is <i>really</i> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doctor%27s_Daughter#Casting" rel="nofollow">the Doctor&#8217;s daughter</a>?  I happened to look it up because I read Moffett and thought of Moffat (didn&#8217;t realize the spelling was different).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
