<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The odd couple and the missing neutron star</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:08:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Relentlessralph</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/comment-page-1/#comment-89597</link>
		<dc:creator>Relentlessralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 06:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/#comment-89597</guid>
		<description>At 465 revs per sec, the surface at it&#039;s equator would be traveling at the speed of light if the diameter were greater than 205 km (127 miles), and that is ignoring the speed of the body in its orbit.  Taking the latter into account, the size of the body would have to be even smaller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 465 revs per sec, the surface at it&#8217;s equator would be traveling at the speed of light if the diameter were greater than 205 km (127 miles), and that is ignoring the speed of the body in its orbit.  Taking the latter into account, the size of the body would have to be even smaller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libraryguy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/comment-page-1/#comment-89596</link>
		<dc:creator>Libraryguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/#comment-89596</guid>
		<description>To StevoR:
Thanks for the info...
Okay, I&#039;m still looking through my back issues of ScienceNews for an article about neuton stars that mentioned the temperature of such objects - that I found a little odd. When/if I find the article I&#039;ll rephrase my question a little more clearly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To StevoR:<br />
Thanks for the info&#8230;<br />
Okay, I&#8217;m still looking through my back issues of ScienceNews for an article about neuton stars that mentioned the temperature of such objects &#8211; that I found a little odd. When/if I find the article I&#8217;ll rephrase my question a little more clearly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/comment-page-1/#comment-89595</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/#comment-89595</guid>
		<description>Hmm ..  couple of other quick thoughts :

Could this be a case similar to the &quot;black widow pulsar&quot; which actaully evapourated its companion star away entirely?

Or could this pulsar have formed through the merger of two white dwarf stars?

In either case, this scenario has taken place in a triple star syetem with only the sun-like star &amp; milli-second pulsar remaining ..

Either of those options plausible &amp;/or testable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm ..  couple of other quick thoughts :</p>
<p>Could this be a case similar to the &#8220;black widow pulsar&#8221; which actaully evapourated its companion star away entirely?</p>
<p>Or could this pulsar have formed through the merger of two white dwarf stars?</p>
<p>In either case, this scenario has taken place in a triple star syetem with only the sun-like star &amp; milli-second pulsar remaining ..</p>
<p>Either of those options plausible &amp;/or testable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/comment-page-1/#comment-89594</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/#comment-89594</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; # &lt;b&gt; Libraryguy &lt;/b&gt; on 15 May 2008 at 3:10 pm
Quick Question- What is the difference between a ‘cold’ and ‘hot’ neutron star? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m guessing time &amp; / or temperature.

Like white dwarfs, neutron stars cannot fuse elements into energy and thus shine only by radiating away their massively hot temperatures they were born with.

A young - and hence still very* hot - neutron star would therefore be a bit different from one that has cooled down over the aeons.

The young hot neutron star or pulsar would have  - usually - a far higher spin rate, immensely strong magnetic field, a searingly blue hot surface etc ...

Vs

the old cold neutron star which would&#039;ve spun down to a slower roatation or spin rate, had its magnetic field fade away a fair bit in intensity - and hence perhaps stopped pulsing, cooled down to a mere white or yellow hot surface etc .. (Ultimately, neutron stars and white dwarfs cool all the way to red heat and finally cold black dwarfs - but that will take longer than the cosmos has been around for yet! ;-) )

That&#039;s just my guess anyway I&#039;m not really 100% sure what you&#039;re referring to here.

----------------
* &quot;very&quot; is utterly inadequate at describing the extremes in play with neutron stars, pulsars &amp; magnetars - but then no words really come close to describing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> # <b> Libraryguy </b> on 15 May 2008 at 3:10 pm<br />
Quick Question- What is the difference between a ‘cold’ and ‘hot’ neutron star? </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing time &amp; / or temperature.</p>
<p>Like white dwarfs, neutron stars cannot fuse elements into energy and thus shine only by radiating away their massively hot temperatures they were born with.</p>
<p>A young &#8211; and hence still very* hot &#8211; neutron star would therefore be a bit different from one that has cooled down over the aeons.</p>
<p>The young hot neutron star or pulsar would have  &#8211; usually &#8211; a far higher spin rate, immensely strong magnetic field, a searingly blue hot surface etc &#8230;</p>
<p>Vs</p>
<p>the old cold neutron star which would&#8217;ve spun down to a slower roatation or spin rate, had its magnetic field fade away a fair bit in intensity &#8211; and hence perhaps stopped pulsing, cooled down to a mere white or yellow hot surface etc .. (Ultimately, neutron stars and white dwarfs cool all the way to red heat and finally cold black dwarfs &#8211; but that will take longer than the cosmos has been around for yet! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just my guess anyway I&#8217;m not really 100% sure what you&#8217;re referring to here.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
* &#8220;very&#8221; is utterly inadequate at describing the extremes in play with neutron stars, pulsars &amp; magnetars &#8211; but then no words really come close to describing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wright</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/comment-page-1/#comment-89593</link>
		<dc:creator>wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/#comment-89593</guid>
		<description>Wow, amazing. Things like this drive home just how big, strange and wonderful the universe is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, amazing. Things like this drive home just how big, strange and wonderful the universe is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superstring</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/comment-page-1/#comment-89592</link>
		<dc:creator>Superstring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/#comment-89592</guid>
		<description>What about the passage of a passing star, through the system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the passage of a passing star, through the system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/comment-page-1/#comment-89591</link>
		<dc:creator>TMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/15/the-odd-couple-and-the-missing-neutron-star/#comment-89591</guid>
		<description>I kind of like the globular cluster idea they mention in the NRAO article...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of like the globular cluster idea they mention in the NRAO article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
