<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dreamworks and Bad Astronomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:06:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patschican</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-92331</link>
		<dc:creator>patschican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/#comment-92331</guid>
		<description>Oh leave Dreamworks alone, for the love of Hugh*. They made Galaxy Quest, one of the funniest spoofs ever.

Guy Fleegman: I know! You construct a weapon. Look around, can you form some sort of rudimentary lathe?

* Hugh Grant -- he&#039;s dreamy....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh leave Dreamworks alone, for the love of Hugh*. They made Galaxy Quest, one of the funniest spoofs ever.</p>
<p>Guy Fleegman: I know! You construct a weapon. Look around, can you form some sort of rudimentary lathe?</p>
<p>* Hugh Grant &#8212; he&#8217;s dreamy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-92330</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 01:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/#comment-92330</guid>
		<description>@Jess: But... Dreamworks did that too! There ARE stars in the dark part of the crescent! :P

You don&#039;t see them on the video due to the bad quality but if you look on Google Images and find a high res of their logo you&#039;ll see the stars there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jess: But&#8230; Dreamworks did that too! There ARE stars in the dark part of the crescent! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t see them on the video due to the bad quality but if you look on Google Images and find a high res of their logo you&#8217;ll see the stars there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess Tauber</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-92329</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess Tauber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/#comment-92329</guid>
		<description>You think this is bad, Bad? In one of the episodes of &#039;The Universe&#039; show aired in the last year or two they have a crescent moon/planet (I don&#039;t remember which) WITH STARS SHINING THROUGH THE DARK PART. Shows like this often have really idiotic graphics in them. Too bad the folks they interview don&#039;t get to look at final cuts before airing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think this is bad, Bad? In one of the episodes of &#8216;The Universe&#8217; show aired in the last year or two they have a crescent moon/planet (I don&#8217;t remember which) WITH STARS SHINING THROUGH THE DARK PART. Shows like this often have really idiotic graphics in them. Too bad the folks they interview don&#8217;t get to look at final cuts before airing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h2opolopunk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-92324</link>
		<dc:creator>h2opolopunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/#comment-92324</guid>
		<description>I had noticed that before, but it never really struck me as strongly as with you. It&#039;s all good... thanks for letting all of us know about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had noticed that before, but it never really struck me as strongly as with you. It&#8217;s all good&#8230; thanks for letting all of us know about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoatTuber</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-92328</link>
		<dc:creator>GoatTuber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/#comment-92328</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget that the kid doesn&#039;t have a reflection in the water. Don&#039;t beat yourself up though, you spotted the bad astronomy in the video, you just missed the bad oceanography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that the kid doesn&#8217;t have a reflection in the water. Don&#8217;t beat yourself up though, you spotted the bad astronomy in the video, you just missed the bad oceanography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DragonGirl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-92327</link>
		<dc:creator>DragonGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/#comment-92327</guid>
		<description>Hmm...actually...  As an animator myself, I don&#039;t think those are errors.  The opening scene is not supposed to reveal itself as a reflection until after the fish hook hits the water.  If it showed a proper reflection of the clouds then the jig would be up from the start.  Since the clouds aren&#039;t properly reflected, there&#039;s no reason the moon should be and considering how short the segment is, it might create unnecessary visual dissonance...it might look funny when you aren&#039;t spending any time thinking about it.  As for the lighting on the clouds..the clouds seem to be lit by the moon itself.  It is the focal point after all so everything reads back to it.  Being able to see the sky through the disc of the moon is irrelevant.  In this case, the moon literally is a crescent.

I don&#039;t see any errors here, just carefully chosen artistic license to maximize the impact of a few seconds of animation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;actually&#8230;  As an animator myself, I don&#8217;t think those are errors.  The opening scene is not supposed to reveal itself as a reflection until after the fish hook hits the water.  If it showed a proper reflection of the clouds then the jig would be up from the start.  Since the clouds aren&#8217;t properly reflected, there&#8217;s no reason the moon should be and considering how short the segment is, it might create unnecessary visual dissonance&#8230;it might look funny when you aren&#8217;t spending any time thinking about it.  As for the lighting on the clouds..the clouds seem to be lit by the moon itself.  It is the focal point after all so everything reads back to it.  Being able to see the sky through the disc of the moon is irrelevant.  In this case, the moon literally is a crescent.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any errors here, just carefully chosen artistic license to maximize the impact of a few seconds of animation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-92326</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/05/27/dreamworks-and-bad-astronomy/#comment-92326</guid>
		<description>BTW, in Transformers you missed the part when Barricade punches Sam and Sam lands onto nearby car and somehow Sam survives all that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, in Transformers you missed the part when Barricade punches Sam and Sam lands onto nearby car and somehow Sam survives all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
