Comments on: Plane collides with UFO… literally

By: kazansky

kazansky — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:50:31 +0000

It is a set up of Romanian DoD. Nothing hits the airplane. Was only a very old cannopy wich was very stressed and broken. Read the point of view of an Romanian high skill ex-pilot of MIG-21 (V.V ) : http://www.rufon.org/forum/index.php/topic,1530.90.html

By: ??????? » ????? ??????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ?????! ????? ???!

??????? » ????? ??????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ?????! ????? ???! — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:06:41 +0000

[...] ???? [...]

By: Michael L

Michael L — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:59:58 +0000

MarkW:
Heard that explanation before, and to be honest, it’s a little weak. I’m not saying I believe it is ET, but that explanation doesn’t hold water.

By: ARP1234

ARP1234 — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:43:50 +0000

The English always act like they are so culturally superior to
everyone else, especially the Americans, but judging by their
newspapers they like to wallow in the same dreck as everyone
else.

How refreshing.

By: David54

David54 — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:55:51 +0000

‘While I was in London I read the daily “Metro” paper and thought it was pretty good.’ As we’d say over here—do me a favour, Phil! How disappointing that even you could be beguiled by this awful excuse for journalism. The Metro is a mind-rotting entertainment magazine pure and simple. It is also a daily environmental disaster on a metropolitan scale.

By: Ginger Yellow

Ginger Yellow — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:26:45 +0000

I’m no fan of Metro, but it’s free, and it’s miles better than The London Paper or London Lite. It’s not much worse than the Evening Standard, but that’s not saying much these days.

By: moopet

moopet — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:53:14 +0000

I couldn’t let this pass: The Metro is a rag. It has amongst other things a column callled “microcosm” which is filled with three or four stories from New Scientist. Which are usually only 10% true. The rest of it includes stories like “ghost girl causes car crashes” on every other page.