<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;but will aliens snack on *us*?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:56:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/comment-page-2/#comment-96594</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/#comment-96594</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking, with how fast technology doubles per year, and how much faster technology will be doubling in years to come, that we&#039;ll either be dead in 90 years or be in an excellent position to say &quot;bring it on, mother ________&quot;. We get home court advantage, tech a thousand times more powerful and dangerous than our military is RIGHT NOW, and we haven&#039;t had to deal with the hardships inherent in maintaining a workable population and equipment on a generation ship. I think we&#039;ll be the ones snacking on them.

Not that this is a good idea, since at best what alien food probably would be edible but without much nutritional value, and at worst would be really toxic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking, with how fast technology doubles per year, and how much faster technology will be doubling in years to come, that we&#8217;ll either be dead in 90 years or be in an excellent position to say &#8220;bring it on, mother ________&#8221;. We get home court advantage, tech a thousand times more powerful and dangerous than our military is RIGHT NOW, and we haven&#8217;t had to deal with the hardships inherent in maintaining a workable population and equipment on a generation ship. I think we&#8217;ll be the ones snacking on them.</p>
<p>Not that this is a good idea, since at best what alien food probably would be edible but without much nutritional value, and at worst would be really toxic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Folcrom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/comment-page-2/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Folcrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/#comment-355</guid>
		<description>When the Aliens put in their order and Doritos can&#039;t supply,
will this create an intersteller incident?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Aliens put in their order and Doritos can&#8217;t supply,<br />
will this create an intersteller incident?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sili</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/comment-page-2/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Sili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bunny-comic.com/?id=1178&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The bunny&lt;/a&gt; seems to be all for more private enterprise in space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bunny-comic.com/?id=1178" rel="nofollow">The bunny</a> seems to be all for more private enterprise in space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osmo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Osmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>I think our location has been revealed to some neighbor years ago, as we are being cooked already... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think our location has been revealed to some neighbor years ago, as we are being cooked already&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Anyone know if the COROT telescope has since checked out this star for more earth-like planets in that gap?
__________________
UMa 47? Who&#039;s she? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know if the COROT telescope has since checked out this star for more earth-like planets in that gap?<br />
__________________<br />
UMa 47? Who&#8217;s she? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Nope from the link the stars actually a couple of billion years older than us - and, as stars brighten with increasing age, if life had begun on a planet there it may well have gone extinct already and thus missed that dumb ad :

 &lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;i&gt; &quot;The star 47 UMa is a yellow G0V star very similar to the Sun, probably about seven billion years old and located about 51 light years from Earth. Fischer noted that the so-called habitable zone around the star -a region approximately equivalent to that between the orbits of Venus and Mars in our solar system, an area that includes Earth - is devoid of large gaseous planets. This means it potentially could harbor an Earth-sized rock we can&#039;t yet see, and won&#039;t be able to see until NASA launches the next generation of planet hunting missions from space.

Based on dynamical computer simulations by Laughlin, Fischer cautioned that &quot; it could be difficult for an Earth-mass terrestrial planet to form in a stable orbit within that habitable zone&quot; because of the proximity of the two outer gas giants.&quot;  &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Source : Press release via the 47 Ursae Majoris link at the top of this page : http://exoplanets.org/esp/47uma/47uma_announceframe.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope from the link the stars actually a couple of billion years older than us &#8211; and, as stars brighten with increasing age, if life had begun on a planet there it may well have gone extinct already and thus missed that dumb ad :</p>
<blockquote><p> <i> &#8220;The star 47 UMa is a yellow G0V star very similar to the Sun, probably about seven billion years old and located about 51 light years from Earth. Fischer noted that the so-called habitable zone around the star -a region approximately equivalent to that between the orbits of Venus and Mars in our solar system, an area that includes Earth &#8211; is devoid of large gaseous planets. This means it potentially could harbor an Earth-sized rock we can&#8217;t yet see, and won&#8217;t be able to see until NASA launches the next generation of planet hunting missions from space.</p>
<p>Based on dynamical computer simulations by Laughlin, Fischer cautioned that &#8221; it could be difficult for an Earth-mass terrestrial planet to form in a stable orbit within that habitable zone&#8221; because of the proximity of the two outer gas giants.&#8221;  </i></p></blockquote>
<p>Source : Press release via the 47 Ursae Majoris link at the top of this page : <a href="http://exoplanets.org/esp/47uma/47uma_announceframe.html" rel="nofollow">http://exoplanets.org/esp/47uma/47uma_announceframe.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/06/12/but-will-aliens-snack-on-us/#comment-349</guid>
		<description>#&lt;b&gt; Cory Albrecht &lt;/b&gt; on 12 Jun 2008 at 8:25 pm
&lt;blockquote&gt; &lt;i&gt;
&quot;If the two jovians of 47 UMa are in 2 and 3.7 AU orbits, isn’t that going to play havoc with the stability of obits for inner planets? Might it even have prevented the formation of anything bigger than Ceres?&quot;
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps, although I don&#039;t think we can be 100 % sure, it seems that&#039;s likely.

The &#039;habitable zone&#039; (HZ) around 47 Ursae Majoris would also be further out and thus more likely in that danger given that stars brighter, hotter and larger than ours - a G0 yellow dwarf star with 1.1 solar masses and is possibly, I think a bit younger than our Sun and thus less likely tohave evolved intelligent species anyway. Let&#039;s hope.

Whatever the case I agree with those who would say this is avery dumb thing to be doing - &amp; I hope nobody else copies it because otherwise we&#039;re giving our solar system a very bad name! ;-)

Therefore I suggest we all boycott those chips  - &amp; tell them why! ;-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#<b> Cory Albrecht </b> on 12 Jun 2008 at 8:25 pm</p>
<blockquote><p> <i><br />
&#8220;If the two jovians of 47 UMa are in 2 and 3.7 AU orbits, isn’t that going to play havoc with the stability of obits for inner planets? Might it even have prevented the formation of anything bigger than Ceres?&#8221;<br />
</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps, although I don&#8217;t think we can be 100 % sure, it seems that&#8217;s likely.</p>
<p>The &#8216;habitable zone&#8217; (HZ) around 47 Ursae Majoris would also be further out and thus more likely in that danger given that stars brighter, hotter and larger than ours &#8211; a G0 yellow dwarf star with 1.1 solar masses and is possibly, I think a bit younger than our Sun and thus less likely tohave evolved intelligent species anyway. Let&#8217;s hope.</p>
<p>Whatever the case I agree with those who would say this is avery dumb thing to be doing &#8211; &amp; I hope nobody else copies it because otherwise we&#8217;re giving our solar system a very bad name! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Therefore I suggest we all boycott those chips  &#8211; &amp; tell them why! ;-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
