<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the Sun look smaller to you?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:52:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Does the Sun Look Smaller to You? &#124; Disinformation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-215952</link>
		<dc:creator>Does the Sun Look Smaller to You? &#124; Disinformation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/#comment-215952</guid>
		<description>[...] GO TO FULL STORY [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GO TO FULL STORY [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Te pareció que el sol era más pequeño ayer? Era el afelio &#171; Noticias del web</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-148965</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Te pareció que el sol era más pequeño ayer? Era el afelio &#171; Noticias del web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/#comment-148965</guid>
		<description>[...] y como explican en Bad Astronomy, la diferencia entre el punto más alejado (Afelio) y el más cercano (Perihelio) es de unos cuatro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] y como explican en Bad Astronomy, la diferencia entre el punto más alejado (Afelio) y el más cercano (Perihelio) es de unos cuatro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Te pareció que el sol era más pequeño ayer? Era el afelio &#124; Proyecto web</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-123264</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Te pareció que el sol era más pequeño ayer? Era el afelio &#124; Proyecto web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/#comment-123264</guid>
		<description>[...] y como explican en Bad Astronomy, la diferencia entre el punto más alejado (Afelio) y el más cercano (Perihelio) es de unos cuatro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] y como explican en Bad Astronomy, la diferencia entre el punto más alejado (Afelio) y el más cercano (Perihelio) es de unos cuatro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Riemer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-106051</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Riemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/#comment-106051</guid>
		<description>The statement, &quot;Of course precession also means that astrology is fundamentally wrong&quot; repeated by several bloggers is also &quot;fundamentally wrong,&quot; for it applies only to Western (tropical) astrology, which is based upon the spring equinox.

Vedic Astrology (from India) uses the sidereal, &quot;star based&quot; zodiac which does maintain the connection with the actual astronomical positions.   And, this is not some minor branch of astrology but is found both in India and increasingly in the West.

Science is only well served when all facts are considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statement, &#8220;Of course precession also means that astrology is fundamentally wrong&#8221; repeated by several bloggers is also &#8220;fundamentally wrong,&#8221; for it applies only to Western (tropical) astrology, which is based upon the spring equinox.</p>
<p>Vedic Astrology (from India) uses the sidereal, &#8220;star based&#8221; zodiac which does maintain the connection with the actual astronomical positions.   And, this is not some minor branch of astrology but is found both in India and increasingly in the West.</p>
<p>Science is only well served when all facts are considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-97271</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/#comment-97271</guid>
		<description>Blaidd Drwg, DUDE, don&#039;t throw DR WHO spoilers in non-DR WHO threads.  Jeeze, some of us haven&#039;t seen it yet, on account of it not airing here for another couple weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blaidd Drwg, DUDE, don&#8217;t throw DR WHO spoilers in non-DR WHO threads.  Jeeze, some of us haven&#8217;t seen it yet, on account of it not airing here for another couple weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Marking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-97049</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Marking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/#comment-97049</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, one more thing: the Earth precesses, that is, the axis of rotation moves like a wobbling top. It takes a long time for the wobble to make one cycle, well over 20,000 years. But this changes the timing of the seasons compared to the orbit. In a few millennia, we’ll have perihelion at the same time as northern summer, and aphelion at northern winter.&quot;

The precessional period (25,765 years) of the earth&#039;s axis is not the only effect.  It turns out that the perihelion point of the earth&#039;s orbit also precesses with a period of 112,000 years due to gravitational effects of the other planets in the solar system.  Relative to the vernal equinox the date of perihelion cycles with a period of 21,000 years.  Thus, 12500 CE would have the perihelion point aligned with the summer solstice in the northern hemisphere, not the 15000 CE mentioned.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession_%28astronomy%29#Anomalistic_precession</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, one more thing: the Earth precesses, that is, the axis of rotation moves like a wobbling top. It takes a long time for the wobble to make one cycle, well over 20,000 years. But this changes the timing of the seasons compared to the orbit. In a few millennia, we’ll have perihelion at the same time as northern summer, and aphelion at northern winter.&#8221;</p>
<p>The precessional period (25,765 years) of the earth&#8217;s axis is not the only effect.  It turns out that the perihelion point of the earth&#8217;s orbit also precesses with a period of 112,000 years due to gravitational effects of the other planets in the solar system.  Relative to the vernal equinox the date of perihelion cycles with a period of 21,000 years.  Thus, 12500 CE would have the perihelion point aligned with the summer solstice in the northern hemisphere, not the 15000 CE mentioned.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession_%28astronomy%29#Anomalistic_precession" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precession_%28astronomy%29#Anomalistic_precession</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Es sol esta mas lejos en el AFELIO &#124; Entrando en mi mundo...</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-96911</link>
		<dc:creator>Es sol esta mas lejos en el AFELIO &#124; Entrando en mi mundo...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/04/does-the-sun-look-smaller-to-you/#comment-96911</guid>
		<description>[...] y como explican en Bad Astronomy, la diferencia entre el punto más alejado (Afelio) y el más cercano (Perihelio) es de unos cuatro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] y como explican en Bad Astronomy, la diferencia entre el punto más alejado (Afelio) y el más cercano (Perihelio) es de unos cuatro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
