<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stryding through the stars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:57:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Galàxia NGC 5907: bellesa còsmica &#124; Diario BV</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-167526</link>
		<dc:creator>Galàxia NGC 5907: bellesa còsmica &#124; Diario BV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/#comment-167526</guid>
		<description>[...] un astrònom professional hagi qualificat aquesta fotografia com una de les més sorprenents que ha vist en la seva vida és un bon aval per a una imatge impactant: El fantasma d&#8217;una [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] un astrònom professional hagi qualificat aquesta fotografia com una de les més sorprenents que ha vist en la seva vida és un bon aval per a una imatge impactant: El fantasma d&#8217;una [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jokergirl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-109054</link>
		<dc:creator>jokergirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/#comment-109054</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also currently my desktop background. (I think it was on APOD a while ago)
One of the best pictures out there.

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also currently my desktop background. (I think it was on APOD a while ago)<br />
One of the best pictures out there.</p>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Torr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-98234</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Torr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/#comment-98234</guid>
		<description>The use of &quot;thousand million&quot; may have been natural caution.  I&#039;m not sure what &quot;billion&quot; means in Spain (which is where it was published, evidently), but  although we have Krispy Kremes and MacDonalds in the UK now, there are still a few people here (mainly older people) who hear &quot;billion&quot; and think &quot;million million&quot;.  In fact, I did when I was at school in the early 1970s.  We only adopted the &quot;American billion&quot; fairly recently, and that was mainly due to the fact that it is used so often in global news reports about economies.

Any Spanish readers who can comment on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of &#8220;thousand million&#8221; may have been natural caution.  I&#8217;m not sure what &#8220;billion&#8221; means in Spain (which is where it was published, evidently), but  although we have Krispy Kremes and MacDonalds in the UK now, there are still a few people here (mainly older people) who hear &#8220;billion&#8221; and think &#8220;million million&#8221;.  In fact, I did when I was at school in the early 1970s.  We only adopted the &#8220;American billion&#8221; fairly recently, and that was mainly due to the fact that it is used so often in global news reports about economies.</p>
<p>Any Spanish readers who can comment on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Scotti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-98057</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Scotti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/#comment-98057</guid>
		<description>What a great image this is.  It reminds me of a Basic program that I copied out of Astronomy Magazine around 20 years ago and then heavily modified which taught me that galaxies are very much 3-dimensional creatures and that some structures that you see as a disk thinking of it as being face on is really a a warped disk tilted at some unusual angle to your view.  

The press release you link to is very informative but it does something that bugs me when I see it.  It said: &quot;...and formed from the destruction of one of its dwarf satellite galaxies at least four thousand million years ago.&quot;  Why couldn&#039;t they just say it was four billion years ago?  You might as well say it happened &quot;twenty thousand two hundred thousand years ago....&quot; or &quot;fifty eighty million years ago&quot;....  

Jim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great image this is.  It reminds me of a Basic program that I copied out of Astronomy Magazine around 20 years ago and then heavily modified which taught me that galaxies are very much 3-dimensional creatures and that some structures that you see as a disk thinking of it as being face on is really a a warped disk tilted at some unusual angle to your view.  </p>
<p>The press release you link to is very informative but it does something that bugs me when I see it.  It said: &#8220;&#8230;and formed from the destruction of one of its dwarf satellite galaxies at least four thousand million years ago.&#8221;  Why couldn&#8217;t they just say it was four billion years ago?  You might as well say it happened &#8220;twenty thousand two hundred thousand years ago&#8230;.&#8221; or &#8220;fifty eighty million years ago&#8221;&#8230;.  </p>
<p>Jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard B. Drumm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-97723</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard B. Drumm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/#comment-97723</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking to Pamela&#039;s blog! I have her &amp; you on my bookmark bar. That was a frakin&#039; great post of  hers. We of the Milky Way have our own tidal tails too, IIRC.
Richard Drumm the Astronomy Bum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking to Pamela&#8217;s blog! I have her &#038; you on my bookmark bar. That was a frakin&#8217; great post of  hers. We of the Milky Way have our own tidal tails too, IIRC.<br />
Richard Drumm the Astronomy Bum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-97604</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/#comment-97604</guid>
		<description>Maybe this is a silly question, but why is it with some of the stars imaged, that there is dark halo around them (mainly the orange-ish star near the middle bottom of the picture)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this is a silly question, but why is it with some of the stars imaged, that there is dark halo around them (mainly the orange-ish star near the middle bottom of the picture)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Plait</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-97478</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Plait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/07/stryding-through-the-stars/#comment-97478</guid>
		<description>Phil Evans: I linked to the announcement of the scientific paper which links to his original. I probably should have included a link to the original too. Noted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil Evans: I linked to the announcement of the scientific paper which links to his original. I probably should have included a link to the original too. Noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
