<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why are there no green stars?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:59:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-464909</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Zimmerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-464909</guid>
		<description>No purple stars, either; blue &amp; red cones stimulated, but green cones quiescent...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No purple stars, either; blue &amp; red cones stimulated, but green cones quiescent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-464375</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-464375</guid>
		<description>There aren&#039;t any green jelly beans, either.  I doubt if it&#039;s a coincidence. http://xkcd.com/882/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There aren&#8217;t any green jelly beans, either.  I doubt if it&#8217;s a coincidence. <a href="http://xkcd.com/882/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/882/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: call of duty black ops hardened edition xbox 360 for sale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-339550</link>
		<dc:creator>call of duty black ops hardened edition xbox 360 for sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-339550</guid>
		<description>99% of Playstation blogs and sites today seem to be copy and past but this site is, keep up the excelent work - chaps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>99% of Playstation blogs and sites today seem to be copy and past but this site is, keep up the excelent work &#8211; chaps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Bates</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-326941</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-326941</guid>
		<description>No green stars since they are roughly black bodies, however: it would be possible to have a green glowing piece of material that was not a black body. It is not widely known, that the radiation spectrum applies per the absorptivity at each wavelength. So, if a body could remain purple at high temperatures (absorb green and reflect red and blue) then it would glow green at high temperatures like around 5000-7000 K. In principle the color could be rather saturated, as a sort of &quot;complementary color.&quot;  Most materials can&#039;t, but that&#039;s a pragmatic issue. Maybe some weird metamaterials might pull it off.  That would be neat, put some chunks of the stuff into a glass-blowing or refining furnace and see people&#039;s reactions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No green stars since they are roughly black bodies, however: it would be possible to have a green glowing piece of material that was not a black body. It is not widely known, that the radiation spectrum applies per the absorptivity at each wavelength. So, if a body could remain purple at high temperatures (absorb green and reflect red and blue) then it would glow green at high temperatures like around 5000-7000 K. In principle the color could be rather saturated, as a sort of &#8220;complementary color.&#8221;  Most materials can&#8217;t, but that&#8217;s a pragmatic issue. Maybe some weird metamaterials might pull it off.  That would be neat, put some chunks of the stuff into a glass-blowing or refining furnace and see people&#8217;s reactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amphiox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-324311</link>
		<dc:creator>amphiox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-324311</guid>
		<description>Another thing to consider regarding plants and green light is that of course plants have more pigments that just chlorophyll, and these pigments can absorb photons of wavelengths that chlorophyll can&#039;t use, dissipate some of the energy, and re-emit a photon that chlorophyll &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; use. (Which is immediately absorbed by the nearby chlorophyll so we won&#039;t see any of it).

So it is not hard to envision the evolution of pigments or systems of pigments that could absorb green light photons and then pass on red and blue light photons to chlorophyll. A plant possessing such a pigment system could look black, and would undeniably be a more efficient photosynthesizer than any green plant.

But evolution has not at least as far as I know stumbled on to this trick. And the reason could simply be because it has never been necessary. There are plenty of red and blue photons around, and there is no need to absorb those middle wavelengths, and manufacturing those other pigments is costly and perhaps isn&#039;t worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing to consider regarding plants and green light is that of course plants have more pigments that just chlorophyll, and these pigments can absorb photons of wavelengths that chlorophyll can&#8217;t use, dissipate some of the energy, and re-emit a photon that chlorophyll <i>can</i> use. (Which is immediately absorbed by the nearby chlorophyll so we won&#8217;t see any of it).</p>
<p>So it is not hard to envision the evolution of pigments or systems of pigments that could absorb green light photons and then pass on red and blue light photons to chlorophyll. A plant possessing such a pigment system could look black, and would undeniably be a more efficient photosynthesizer than any green plant.</p>
<p>But evolution has not at least as far as I know stumbled on to this trick. And the reason could simply be because it has never been necessary. There are plenty of red and blue photons around, and there is no need to absorb those middle wavelengths, and manufacturing those other pigments is costly and perhaps isn&#8217;t worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amphiox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-324307</link>
		<dc:creator>amphiox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-324307</guid>
		<description>Brian L, #150;

You really shouldn&#039;t take a throwaway joke that seriously. It&#039;s not good for the blood pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian L, #150;</p>
<p>You really shouldn&#8217;t take a throwaway joke that seriously. It&#8217;s not good for the blood pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khalid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-320501</link>
		<dc:creator>Khalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 02:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-320501</guid>
		<description>in 147  Mike Says on August 30th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

&quot;Why are plants green?  According to Fred Hoyle, green plants on Earth originated from unicellular photosynthetic organisms that came aboard comets. ...&quot;

Q1. Was there any scientific proof that unicellular organisms can ride a comet and fall on earth and evolved to become plants?

Q2. are you (in 147) stating those as it is or as a science fiction joke? Fred Hoyle was also a science fiction writer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in 147  Mike Says on August 30th, 2008 at 2:52 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;Why are plants green?  According to Fred Hoyle, green plants on Earth originated from unicellular photosynthetic organisms that came aboard comets. &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Q1. Was there any scientific proof that unicellular organisms can ride a comet and fall on earth and evolved to become plants?</p>
<p>Q2. are you (in 147) stating those as it is or as a science fiction joke? Fred Hoyle was also a science fiction writer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridgit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-286761</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-286761</guid>
		<description>I saw a green star tonight! I thought it was strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a green star tonight! I thought it was strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-258600</link>
		<dc:creator>Dann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-258600</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t this all be much more simply described without starting up the notorious &quot;colour is all in our minds&quot; debate? It seem to be all about the way heat produces light in a curve. Stars that have curves that cross through the visible spectrum at an angle look either redder or bluer based on the angle, stars with curves that cross through more evenly or peak there look white because no curve can be steep enough to pinpoint that one juicy green frequency. We can obviously see green, its not in our eyes, its completely based on the way heat creates light. Am I wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t this all be much more simply described without starting up the notorious &#8220;colour is all in our minds&#8221; debate? It seem to be all about the way heat produces light in a curve. Stars that have curves that cross through the visible spectrum at an angle look either redder or bluer based on the angle, stars with curves that cross through more evenly or peak there look white because no curve can be steep enough to pinpoint that one juicy green frequency. We can obviously see green, its not in our eyes, its completely based on the way heat creates light. Am I wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A hex on star colors - Skeptics Resource</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-252439</link>
		<dc:creator>A hex on star colors - Skeptics Resource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-252439</guid>
		<description>[...] than the way colors are represented on your screen. Stars are hot balls of luminous plasma, glowing like a blackbody. Unless you heat your monitor to that same temperature, you can only approximate the way a star [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than the way colors are represented on your screen. Stars are hot balls of luminous plasma, glowing like a blackbody. Unless you heat your monitor to that same temperature, you can only approximate the way a star [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoWonk.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A hex on star colors</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-252354</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoWonk.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A hex on star colors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-252354</guid>
		<description>[...] than the way colors are represented on your screen. Stars are hot balls of luminous plasma, glowing like a blackbody. Unless you heat your monitor to that same temperature, you can only approximate the way a star [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than the way colors are represented on your screen. Stars are hot balls of luminous plasma, glowing like a blackbody. Unless you heat your monitor to that same temperature, you can only approximate the way a star [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-195193</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-195193</guid>
		<description>&quot;The x-axis is wavelength (color, if you like) color, and the spectrum of visible colors is superposed for reference.&quot;

Wavelength and color have almost nothing to do with one another.  For example, while some pure colors happen to correspond to particular wavelengths, but other pure colors cannot be produced by any light of a single wavelength.  This was already known to Newton and Helmholtz.  It&#039;s really a shame that many physicists still don&#039;t know the first thing about color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The x-axis is wavelength (color, if you like) color, and the spectrum of visible colors is superposed for reference.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wavelength and color have almost nothing to do with one another.  For example, while some pure colors happen to correspond to particular wavelengths, but other pure colors cannot be produced by any light of a single wavelength.  This was already known to Newton and Helmholtz.  It&#8217;s really a shame that many physicists still don&#8217;t know the first thing about color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mental_floss Blog &#187; Morning Cup of Links: Sex Determination Lab</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-193847</link>
		<dc:creator>mental_floss Blog &#187; Morning Cup of Links: Sex Determination Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-193847</guid>
		<description>[...] just not that simple. * There are blue stars, red stars, and yellow stars. Why are there no green stars? * Take a nice relaxing flight. There, isn&#8217;t that soothing? * 10 Things You Should Know About [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just not that simple. * There are blue stars, red stars, and yellow stars. Why are there no green stars? * Take a nice relaxing flight. There, isn&#8217;t that soothing? * 10 Things You Should Know About [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lila</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-192893</link>
		<dc:creator>lila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-192893</guid>
		<description>el horto dia mire por mi telescopio i mire acia una estrella  i era de color berde es posible que fuera una nave de extraterestres?????????????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>el horto dia mire por mi telescopio i mire acia una estrella  i era de color berde es posible que fuera una nave de extraterestres?????????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estrellas verdes &#171; La Ciencia para todos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-187771</link>
		<dc:creator>Estrellas verdes &#171; La Ciencia para todos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-187771</guid>
		<description>[...] este enlace podéis ver una gráfica de cómo es la emisión de una estrella según su temperatura (según la aproximación de cuerpo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] este enlace podéis ver una gráfica de cómo es la emisión de una estrella según su temperatura (según la aproximación de cuerpo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pisces</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-176346</link>
		<dc:creator>Pisces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-176346</guid>
		<description>@madge.....&quot;The Night Sky&quot;

Beautiful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@madge&#8230;..&#8221;The Night Sky&#8221;</p>
<p>Beautiful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Nagorsen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-168360</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Nagorsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-168360</guid>
		<description>WZ Cas (near Beta Cas) is a nice example of a coloured double star (Spectral types N and A, distance 58&quot;, around mag 8). Due to the contrast to the red N star the A star really looks green to me (and to most of my fellow observers). It&#039;s like traffic lights without the yellow light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WZ Cas (near Beta Cas) is a nice example of a coloured double star (Spectral types N and A, distance 58&#8243;, around mag 8). Due to the contrast to the red N star the A star really looks green to me (and to most of my fellow observers). It&#8217;s like traffic lights without the yellow light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: REAL star looks - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-139510</link>
		<dc:creator>REAL star looks - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-139510</guid>
		<description>[...] related reading: Why are there no green stars?, by the BA. More here.  Nick    __________________ Nick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] related reading: Why are there no green stars?, by the BA. More here.  Nick    __________________ Nick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomas kindahl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-4/#comment-137085</link>
		<dc:creator>tomas kindahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-137085</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s this nonsens! Of course there are green stars. But they&#039;re incredibly rare. First of all: not all stars emit light according to black-body radiation, some stars have emission lines that overwhelms the rest of the spectrum. These emission lines tend to be in blue or red, because of the narrowness of the part of the spectrum which our eyes interpret as green. So we may observe purple or impossibly blue Wolf-Rayet stars -- those stars that has the clearest emission lines. What we need is a star that has a corona dominated by green emission lines or bands. Most probably they&#039;re out there, just awaiting discovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s this nonsens! Of course there are green stars. But they&#8217;re incredibly rare. First of all: not all stars emit light according to black-body radiation, some stars have emission lines that overwhelms the rest of the spectrum. These emission lines tend to be in blue or red, because of the narrowness of the part of the spectrum which our eyes interpret as green. So we may observe purple or impossibly blue Wolf-Rayet stars &#8212; those stars that has the clearest emission lines. What we need is a star that has a corona dominated by green emission lines or bands. Most probably they&#8217;re out there, just awaiting discovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian L.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-3/#comment-129014</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-129014</guid>
		<description>To amphiox, that statement about something like &quot;the sunlight not being the best wavelength for plants&quot;, that was poor observating, reasoning, and evaluating skills displayed there.  There are other lifeforms that need the sunlight as well, different creatures and natural things at different wavelengths, and so the sun&#039;s wavelength would not be very useful it was well-suited for only the plants.  The sun is well-suited for good-enough-for-everybody-it-affects, and that&#039;s something random chance couldn&#039;t never precisely do with our lives just so happening to rely on it.  That&#039;s a design fulfilling MULTIPLE purposes...and btw, MOST &quot;Christian&quot; Creationist don&#039;t even believe ALL of their own source of information, so one shouldn&#039;t even base their understanding of Creation theory on theirs...  The sun is PERFECT for what needs to be done for life here!  It&#039;s the EARTH that&#039;s horribly flawed!  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To amphiox, that statement about something like &#8220;the sunlight not being the best wavelength for plants&#8221;, that was poor observating, reasoning, and evaluating skills displayed there.  There are other lifeforms that need the sunlight as well, different creatures and natural things at different wavelengths, and so the sun&#8217;s wavelength would not be very useful it was well-suited for only the plants.  The sun is well-suited for good-enough-for-everybody-it-affects, and that&#8217;s something random chance couldn&#8217;t never precisely do with our lives just so happening to rely on it.  That&#8217;s a design fulfilling MULTIPLE purposes&#8230;and btw, MOST &#8220;Christian&#8221; Creationist don&#8217;t even believe ALL of their own source of information, so one shouldn&#8217;t even base their understanding of Creation theory on theirs&#8230;  The sun is PERFECT for what needs to be done for life here!  It&#8217;s the EARTH that&#8217;s horribly flawed!  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: --Andrea--</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-3/#comment-120044</link>
		<dc:creator>--Andrea--</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 04:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-120044</guid>
		<description>@@nickenino:

I believe that someone answered this question earlier in the comments!! You should search and read it, I found it very interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@@nickenino:</p>
<p>I believe that someone answered this question earlier in the comments!! You should search and read it, I found it very interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickenino</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-3/#comment-115103</link>
		<dc:creator>nickenino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-115103</guid>
		<description>Have you ever ear something about the Green Light? It&#039;s a kind of (green) ray that one see when the last sun ray lights at a sea sunset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever ear something about the Green Light? It&#8217;s a kind of (green) ray that one see when the last sun ray lights at a sea sunset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-3/#comment-114868</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-114868</guid>
		<description>Why are plants green ?

According to Fred Hoyle, green plants on Earth originated from unicellular
photosynthetic organisms that came aboard comets.

These unicellular photosynthetic organisms were born in giant molecular clods where the 
light from neighboring stars was reddened by the intervening dust.

They needed a green photosynthetic pigment - chlorophyll , to absorb the red light optimally .

Present day plants descended from these unicellular plants
that came from space.

Some plants developed photosynthetic pigments of other colors, but 
chlorophyll had a head start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are plants green ?</p>
<p>According to Fred Hoyle, green plants on Earth originated from unicellular<br />
photosynthetic organisms that came aboard comets.</p>
<p>These unicellular photosynthetic organisms were born in giant molecular clods where the<br />
light from neighboring stars was reddened by the intervening dust.</p>
<p>They needed a green photosynthetic pigment &#8211; chlorophyll , to absorb the red light optimally .</p>
<p>Present day plants descended from these unicellular plants<br />
that came from space.</p>
<p>Some plants developed photosynthetic pigments of other colors, but<br />
chlorophyll had a head start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Followup: Green objects in space &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-3/#comment-114675</link>
		<dc:creator>Followup: Green objects in space &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-114675</guid>
		<description>[...] while back, I wrote about why there are no green stars in the sky (you should read that post first; some of the concepts below are explained [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while back, I wrote about why there are no green stars in the sky (you should read that post first; some of the concepts below are explained [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/comment-page-3/#comment-110940</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/29/why-are-there-no-green-stars/#comment-110940</guid>
		<description>There really aren&#039;t that many colours of blackbody radiation:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/afternoon_sunlight/236589919/&quot; title=&quot;blackbody_colours by afternoon_sunlight, on Flickr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm1.static.flickr.com/95/236589919_db36543bda_m.jpg&quot; width=&quot;23&quot; height=&quot;240&quot; alt=&quot;blackbody_colours&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
(feel free to use that Creative Commons image by the way). The very hottest stars are a sort of baby blue, as you can see here if your computer correctly reproduces the colours.

Whether the sun is white or yellow is actually not really a well-defined question. So much of colour perception is in our heads that it doesn&#039;t make sense to ask what colour an object &quot;really&quot; is. For example, a piece of &quot;black&quot; asphalt in dazzling sunlight might be sending exactly the same spectrum (and amount) of light into your eyes as a piece of white paper in dimmer light, but your eyes will correctly perceive the one as black and the other as white using context. Colour perception is even more complicated, as anyone who&#039;s had to fool with the white balance controls on a digital camera should know.  Optical illusions serve to make the brain&#039;s interpolation obvious, but it goes on all the time. 

In particular, the claim that snow would look yellow if the sun were yellow is just plain wrong: white paper looks just as white under the Sun as it does under yellow incandescent bulbs or under ugly industrial fluorescents. The Sun usually looks yellow when you look at it, and there isn&#039;t really a more absolute sense in which you can say it&#039;s &quot;really&quot; white. 

Colour is a much more complicated business than the usual mumbo-jumbo about additive and subtractive primary colours that most of us got in school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There really aren&#8217;t that many colours of blackbody radiation:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/afternoon_sunlight/236589919/" title="blackbody_colours by afternoon_sunlight, on Flickr" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/95/236589919_db36543bda_m.jpg" width="23" height="240" alt="blackbody_colours" /></a><br />
(feel free to use that Creative Commons image by the way). The very hottest stars are a sort of baby blue, as you can see here if your computer correctly reproduces the colours.</p>
<p>Whether the sun is white or yellow is actually not really a well-defined question. So much of colour perception is in our heads that it doesn&#8217;t make sense to ask what colour an object &#8220;really&#8221; is. For example, a piece of &#8220;black&#8221; asphalt in dazzling sunlight might be sending exactly the same spectrum (and amount) of light into your eyes as a piece of white paper in dimmer light, but your eyes will correctly perceive the one as black and the other as white using context. Colour perception is even more complicated, as anyone who&#8217;s had to fool with the white balance controls on a digital camera should know.  Optical illusions serve to make the brain&#8217;s interpolation obvious, but it goes on all the time. </p>
<p>In particular, the claim that snow would look yellow if the sun were yellow is just plain wrong: white paper looks just as white under the Sun as it does under yellow incandescent bulbs or under ugly industrial fluorescents. The Sun usually looks yellow when you look at it, and there isn&#8217;t really a more absolute sense in which you can say it&#8217;s &#8220;really&#8221; white. </p>
<p>Colour is a much more complicated business than the usual mumbo-jumbo about additive and subtractive primary colours that most of us got in school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-12 14:16:26 -->
