<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third Falcon try</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:04:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Falcon 1, take 3: today at 4:00 Pacific time! &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/comment-page-1/#comment-108406</link>
		<dc:creator>Falcon 1, take 3: today at 4:00 Pacific time! &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/#comment-108406</guid>
		<description>[...] X has announced that they will attempt to launch a Falcon 1 rocket into orbit today. The launch window starts at 4:00 Pacific time (23:00 UT). Read more about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] X has announced that they will attempt to launch a Falcon 1 rocket into orbit today. The launch window starts at 4:00 Pacific time (23:00 UT). Read more about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Krendik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/comment-page-1/#comment-107792</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Krendik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/#comment-107792</guid>
		<description>I hope they make it too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they make it too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaDeR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/comment-page-1/#comment-107433</link>
		<dc:creator>MaDeR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/#comment-107433</guid>
		<description>&gt;Is the Falcon big enough for manned flights? 
This version (Falcon 1) no, but SpaceX works on different, bigger version (called Falcon 9) that will be capable to take human payload in capsule named Dragon.

And for question about faliure rates... doing something completely from scrath IS bound to have growing pains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Is the Falcon big enough for manned flights?<br />
This version (Falcon 1) no, but SpaceX works on different, bigger version (called Falcon 9) that will be capable to take human payload in capsule named Dragon.</p>
<p>And for question about faliure rates&#8230; doing something completely from scrath IS bound to have growing pains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AAEBoiler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/comment-page-1/#comment-107412</link>
		<dc:creator>AAEBoiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/#comment-107412</guid>
		<description>The Falcon would never be used for manned flight. The cost of man-rating the vehicle (meaning ensuring every single part is ultra-reliable and wouldn&#039;t lead to a catastrophic failure resulting in a loss of life) would be too prohibitive for a private company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Falcon would never be used for manned flight. The cost of man-rating the vehicle (meaning ensuring every single part is ultra-reliable and wouldn&#8217;t lead to a catastrophic failure resulting in a loss of life) would be too prohibitive for a private company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umair Rahat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/comment-page-1/#comment-107299</link>
		<dc:creator>Umair Rahat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/#comment-107299</guid>
		<description>Just plain wonderful. Good luck SpaceX!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just plain wonderful. Good luck SpaceX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/comment-page-1/#comment-107244</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/#comment-107244</guid>
		<description>&gt;Is the Falcon big enough for manned flights? 

Well the payload is about the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>Is the Falcon big enough for manned flights? </p>
<p>Well the payload is about the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justcorbly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/comment-page-1/#comment-107227</link>
		<dc:creator>justcorbly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/30/third-falcon-try/#comment-107227</guid>
		<description>Good luck to them. This would have more impact than anything Branson might do.

Reminder:  Innovation in the air industry has alway come from government-funded efforts.  We should expect the same in the private space arena. SpaceX is following a path laid down by early aeronautical entrepreneurs. I.e., the profitable exploitation of technology whose development was subsidized by the taxpayers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck to them. This would have more impact than anything Branson might do.</p>
<p>Reminder:  Innovation in the air industry has alway come from government-funded efforts.  We should expect the same in the private space arena. SpaceX is following a path laid down by early aeronautical entrepreneurs. I.e., the profitable exploitation of technology whose development was subsidized by the taxpayers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
