<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I </title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:21:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/comment-page-1/#comment-144063</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/#comment-144063</guid>
		<description>OMG, that was the WEIRDEST thing i have listened to in a looooooooooooooong time. Very entertaining!(and i thought I could come up with some weird stuff to spout off!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, that was the WEIRDEST thing i have listened to in a looooooooooooooong time. Very entertaining!(and i thought I could come up with some weird stuff to spout off!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Plait</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/comment-page-1/#comment-120853</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Plait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/#comment-120853</guid>
		<description>Holli: Ah, that makes sense. Of course, sexist jokes (or pr0n or the like) would be labeled NSFW, so the association is (now) understandable to me. I was really baffled by your comment before, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holli: Ah, that makes sense. Of course, sexist jokes (or pr0n or the like) would be labeled NSFW, so the association is (now) understandable to me. I was really baffled by your comment before, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Parsec</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/comment-page-1/#comment-120603</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Parsec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/#comment-120603</guid>
		<description>ip -

It&#039;s  a sideways heart, as in all the bumper stickers that say &quot;I (picture of as heart, Valentine&#039;s day style, not an organic pump) my Labrador Retriever&quot; or whatever.

Took me 2 0r 3 of them before I cottoned on, too.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ip -</p>
<p>It&#8217;s  a sideways heart, as in all the bumper stickers that say &#8220;I (picture of as heart, Valentine&#8217;s day style, not an organic pump) my Labrador Retriever&#8221; or whatever.</p>
<p>Took me 2 0r 3 of them before I cottoned on, too.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/comment-page-1/#comment-120295</link>
		<dc:creator>Holli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/#comment-120295</guid>
		<description>My apologies.  The only times I&#039;ve seen it used was on massively misogynistic jokes.  It never occured to me otherwise.  My mistake!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies.  The only times I&#8217;ve seen it used was on massively misogynistic jokes.  It never occured to me otherwise.  My mistake!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ipgrunt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/comment-page-1/#comment-120243</link>
		<dc:creator>ipgrunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/#comment-120243</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to understand why you would use &quot;&lt;3&quot; to represent love?

It can&#039;t be &quot;less-than 3&quot; because there&#039;s no space between the characters, and I&#039;m assuming this to be some kind of emoticon with which I am not familar (in other words, the set of all emoticons, excluding those 5 or 6 with which I _am_ familiar).

Looking starboard, I see a parachute, or maybe an ice cream cone (two scoops!) To port, who knows -- perhaps a dunce cap (size xxxxxx-large; think Rick Moranis&#039; character in Space Balls--Big Helmet) worn by a topless woman? 

Sorry,

Perhaps I should sign this one,   ;#)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to understand why you would use &#8220;&lt;3&#8243; to represent love?</p>
<p>It can&#8217;t be &#8220;less-than 3&#8243; because there&#8217;s no space between the characters, and I&#8217;m assuming this to be some kind of emoticon with which I am not familar (in other words, the set of all emoticons, excluding those 5 or 6 with which I _am_ familiar).</p>
<p>Looking starboard, I see a parachute, or maybe an ice cream cone (two scoops!) To port, who knows &#8212; perhaps a dunce cap (size xxxxxx-large; think Rick Moranis&#8217; character in Space Balls&#8211;Big Helmet) worn by a topless woman? </p>
<p>Sorry,</p>
<p>Perhaps I should sign this one,   ;#)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarrieP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/comment-page-1/#comment-120121</link>
		<dc:creator>CarrieP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/#comment-120121</guid>
		<description>Holli,

NSFW usually means &quot;not safe for work.&quot; Since many people consume their media at work, say during lunch or when they are slacking off, that label can be extremely useful, especially with regards to imagery.

Me, I&#039;ve got headphones and consume podcasts pretty much all day while doing data entry, so NSFW isn&#039;t important to me on an audio file, but it is really nice on a video file or even on a blog that tends to use swear words or writes about &quot;mature content&quot; (whatever that means).

I have not seen a usage meaning &quot;Not safe for women.&quot; However, the state in which I live used to have a law on the books that made using &quot;indecent, immoral, obscene, vulgar or insulting language in the presence or hearing of any woman or child&quot; a misdemeanor. 

When I say used to, I don&#039;t mean 100 years ago, I mean less than 10 years ago. I loved this case because it meant that anytime a woman swore it meant she was de facto breaking the law. As a woman who has been known to let fly a string of curses on occasion, I found this highly amusing. 

Law has been overturned by the courts, but the provision for kids still stands. Joy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holli,</p>
<p>NSFW usually means &#8220;not safe for work.&#8221; Since many people consume their media at work, say during lunch or when they are slacking off, that label can be extremely useful, especially with regards to imagery.</p>
<p>Me, I&#8217;ve got headphones and consume podcasts pretty much all day while doing data entry, so NSFW isn&#8217;t important to me on an audio file, but it is really nice on a video file or even on a blog that tends to use swear words or writes about &#8220;mature content&#8221; (whatever that means).</p>
<p>I have not seen a usage meaning &#8220;Not safe for women.&#8221; However, the state in which I live used to have a law on the books that made using &#8220;indecent, immoral, obscene, vulgar or insulting language in the presence or hearing of any woman or child&#8221; a misdemeanor. </p>
<p>When I say used to, I don&#8217;t mean 100 years ago, I mean less than 10 years ago. I loved this case because it meant that anytime a woman swore it meant she was de facto breaking the law. As a woman who has been known to let fly a string of curses on occasion, I found this highly amusing. </p>
<p>Law has been overturned by the courts, but the provision for kids still stands. Joy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/comment-page-1/#comment-120015</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/09/20/why-i/#comment-120015</guid>
		<description>Black blood of the earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black blood of the earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
