Comments on: Time travel discovered!

By: Bill Thompson

Bill Thompson — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:03:45 +0000

It is subjective so it does not matter if he claims victory before the debate. Facts like that are ignored by Phil because it does not suit his slant.

Phil is critical of the right for being flawed.

Why not be critical of the left for being diabolical?

When my relatives overseas talk about the US president being a war criminal, they are talking about Bill Clinton, not Bush.

Did we ignore the fact that Obama talked about wiping out Pakistan during the debate?

By: Jon

Jon — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:31:34 +0000

Oh no! I can’t believe you actually repeated the ‘inventing the blackberry’ story….that’s just as horribly inaccurate as the ‘Al Gore invents internet’ story.

By: Justin

Justin — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:19:34 +0000

“Wow, both candidates can make gaffes — shocking isn’t it!!”

More like both candidates can be too underinformed to effectively govern.

I’m not exactly undecided. I know who I would want to be the next President. He didn’t get the nomination. Now I’m stuck between two people who’s ideological stances are cm apart. It’s ridiculous.

By: Mark Schaffer

Mark Schaffer — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:17:24 +0000

Well the ad was real as this screen shot of the Wall Street Journal online shows:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/images/26Sep_Friday_WSJ.JPG

By: shane

shane — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:23:32 +0000

@Pablo: if McSame is against torture then why did he vote against banning it?
It isn’t torture when you do it to other people.

@GQ: How do you “win” a debate? Is there some kind of scoring system?
Marquis of Queensbury Rules.

By: Rob Speed

Rob Speed — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:08:59 +0000

Come on, Phil. Have some critical thinking. This was reported by one person, and the photo of McCain is horrible. It’s clearly a hoax.

By: GQ

GQ — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:10:57 +0000

How do you “win” a debate? Is there some kind of scoring system?