DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Watermelon planet
Arts and science in Pasadena »

Galactic tentacles of DOOM

Today is a good day for awesome images. Check out M86 and NGC 4438:

NOAO image of galaxies M86 and NGC 4438

These two galaxies lie in the Virgo Cluster, a city of galaxies about 50 million light years away. Life is crowded in the cluster, and collisions between galaxies are common.

Now, that line sounds pretty mundane, but think about it: entire galaxies collide! They slam into each other at hundreds of kilometers per second! Billions of stars interact gravitationally! Gas clouds impact creating cosmic fireworks on an epic scale! AIIIIEEEE!!!!!!

Phew. OK. That’s outta my system now.

So we see galaxy collisions all the time, but sometimes the evidence is weak. NGC 4438 is the galaxy on the left, and it’s all twisty and distorted. M86 is a more normal looking elliptical. But looking at the gas content of M86 has indicated something is going on; it’s heated up pretty well, and distorted. But it wasn’t until now we could see why.

That image above is from a 4 meter telescope in Arizona. It has a camera that allows it to collect a lot of light over a big area of the sky. When a filter was used that isolates warm hydrogen gas, astronomers found these tendrils connecting the two galaxies. Those tentacles are the shrapnel of the impact, streamed out in the aftermath of the collision… and the galaxies are now 400,000 light years apart. That’s four times the size of our Milky Way.

The sciencey part of this is that they looked for new stars being born in those filaments; that’s common after collisions. However, there aren’t any! The collision happened at such high speed that the gas got really hot, and couldn’t condense to form stars. That has implications for the galaxies themselves. It’s been something of a mystery as to why elliptical galaxies stopped forming stars early in their lives. It’s thought the central supermassive black hole in the center of every galaxy plays a part; as the black hole feeds on matter it blows off a huge wind, blowing out the galaxy’s gas and cutting off star formation.

But now we see that collisions may play a role as well, heating up the galaxy’s gas and preventing it from making stars. It’s hard to say how much each process contributes; early in a galaxy’s life it hasn’t had much time to collide with others, so maybe this becomes important later. And spirals have those black holes too, yet stars still form in them. Obviously, there’s a lot of complicated stuff going on.

Either way, with these new detectors we can look deep into the goings-on of nearby galaxy clusters and learn more about them. And there’s a lot to learn! I’ll note that Virgo is the nearest big cluster, and M86 is visible easily in binoculars, yet here’s something new and surprising to discover about it.

Oh, and that edge-on spiral in the lower right? That’s NGC 4388, which was once thought to be associated somehow with M86. But the filaments seen emanating from it are really high velocity, so something else may be going on there as well.

In a couple of billion years, our Milky Way galaxy will collide with Andromeda in a pretty decently ginormous event. They’ll pass through each other, but then fall back again. Over the course of about five billion more years, and a handful of passes, the two will merge into one massive galaxy. What will happen to us then? Will the Sun fall toward our own central black hole? Or will we get ejected from the galaxy, flung out into intergalactic space?

We don’t know. But I know where you can find out more info… Chapter 8. Mwuhahahahahaha!

Image credit: Tomer Tal and Jeffrey Kenney/Yale University and NOAO/AURA/NSF

Share

October 7th, 2008 12:37 PM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, DeathfromtheSkies!, Pretty pictures | 34 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

34 Responses to “Galactic tentacles of DOOM”

  1. 1.   DGKnipfer Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:00 pm

    Chapter 8 of what? :)

  2. 2.   Larian LeQuella Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    How many billions of years before the Andromeda/Milky Way collision? We may not be concerned that much about our native sun, but maybe one that we’ve moved to? :)

  3. 3.   Zurack Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    Chapter 8 of Death from the Skies of course!

    (Woo, my first post!)

  4. 4.   Kevin F. Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    Too true. Most of the world seems more concerned with Chapter 13 at the moment…. :D

  5. 5.   Weird stuff Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:24 pm

    @ Kevin F.

    Good one.

  6. 6.   glenn schneider Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:29 pm

    But what ALSO is really cool (not mentioned in Phil’s post, but in the astro-ph preprint) is the material that appears to be streaming (at high velocity) from the neighboring NGC 4388 in the lower right (color coded green to indicate H-alpha + [NII] emission) toward M86. Not conclusive (as the authors point out in a footnote in the preprint) but this “collision” may be even more complex than first meets the eye.

  7. 7.   glenn schneider Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:32 pm

    Well, I see Phil DID mention it (NGC 4388) — apologies — for some reason that did not appear in my web browser (gremlins) on first display. Still, really cool!

  8. 8.   Arthur Maruyama Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:33 pm

    Larian LeQuella:

    BA did write that the collision will take place “[i]n a couple of billions of years.”

  9. 9.   Larian LeQuella Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:42 pm

    Considering the way Americans count, a couple billion could mean 2, or 700, or 850. We are bad with numbers that have billion associated with them. ;)

  10. 10.   Xave Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 1:56 pm

    Astronomy newb here. So what you’re saying is that maybe collisions cause elliptical galaxies to heat up too much to form new stars. So does that mean they don’t cool down at all over time?

  11. 11.   Architeuthis Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    And now my computer has a new desktop image…. Very cool!

  12. 12.   Danniel B. Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 2:30 pm

    Mine too, replacing “black eye galaxy” M64

  13. 13.   strahlungsamt Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    What are those 2 identical black “lemons” in the picture. There is one at the edge of each of the big galaxies?

    UFOs???

  14. 14.   JSug Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    Pareidolia moment for the day: In the upper center of the image I can clearly see the silhouette of a very familiar spacecraft…

  15. 15.   iain Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 2:51 pm

    strahlungsamt: “What are those 2 identical black “lemons” in the picture.”

    The meatballs of His Holiness, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, naturally!

  16. 16.   Brian T. Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 3:39 pm

    JSug:

    The TARDIS? That’s what it looks like to me, anyway.

  17. 17.   Samantha Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 4:04 pm

    Hey, Phil! I love your enthusiasm! I’ve subscribed to your feed for a while. Love the comments in here too, folks!

    (I would like to thank commenter Glen Schneider above for answering my unasked Q about the galaxy in the background with the green tentacles, too!)

  18. 18.   Captain Swoop Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 4:04 pm

    Azathoth

  19. 19.   ozprof Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 4:33 pm

    My first reaction when I saw that image was “that is not a REAL picture surely!!!”

    Having seen so many images of this region, that is one heck of an image!!!!!!

  20. 20.   Les Johnson Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    Great write-up on one of the many recent discoveries in the field of astronomy.
    Maybe a rest from that anti ID rants for awhile?

  21. 21.   jeff kenney Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    i love your title “galactic tentacles of DOOM”!!
    i wish i thought of it for the title of the journal article!

  22. 22.   GroovyBrent Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 9:24 pm

    OH! “Tentacles”… I thought you said “tes…” Nevermind.

    Amazing image and fantastic (as always) explanation.

  23. 23.   Jose Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 9:48 pm

    @JSug
    All I see is a wrist and hand (probably belonging to the Virgin Mary) giving us the finger.

  24. 24.   quasidog Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    Very cool.

  25. 25.   shane Says:
    October 7th, 2008 at 11:04 pm

    Durn it, but the universe is so durned purty. Obviously it has been designed for our, and only our, viewing pleasure. Obviously by designed for us I meant those of us designed with 4 meter telescopes with special cameras that are filtered in such a way that picture can be made that we can see it posted on the godless intertoob.

  26. 26.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    October 8th, 2008 at 5:07 am

    Wow, what a spectacular image, and what spectacular imagery you invoke, Phil. I don’t think I can wait 5 billion years to find out what happens to our sun after our galaxy merges with Andromeda (but won’t our sun be going nova at around that time anyway?).

    I particularly like the scale bar : “20 kpc”. Images I deal with usually have a scale bar that says “1 µm” (about a gazillion times smaller).

  27. 27.   Johnny Vector Says:
    October 8th, 2008 at 7:09 am

    One of my favorite moments from grad school (yes Virginia, grad school does come with favorite moments) is watching Alar Toomre show us the colliding galaxies simulation film he made with his brother Jüri. It was done in the seventies, had something like 500 stars per galaxy, and was made by photographing an image on a storage oscilloscope screen. Each star was represented by the letter “M” (for “mass”). I think the frame rate they were able to generate was one frame every 10 minutes or so. The result was a nice 16mm film that still looked good when I saw it in the mid-90s. Looked just like the antenna galaxies!

    And now the same thing is done as a screen-saver. For entertainment! With CPU cycles that would otherwise go unused!

    And yes, I know this photo is of gas, not stars, but since actual collisions between stars are so rare in galactic collisions, it’s all gravity in either case.

  28. 28.   Invader Xan Says:
    October 8th, 2008 at 7:13 am

    Wow.

    Do you mind if I ask…

    Those tendrils emanating from NGC 4388 — they’re green. What exactly is being detected there?

    I’m guessing the warm hydrogen in those red tentacles is giving off H-alpha (hence, red). Are the green ones emitting H-beta? Or is it something else?

    (Sorry to go all technical there! :) )

  29. 29.   Johnny Vector Says:
    October 8th, 2008 at 7:27 am

    @Invader Xan:

    According to the caption at the NOAO site, “The green filaments seen near the edge-on spiral galaxy in the lower right (NGC 4388) show H-alpha emission with much higher velocities, suggesting that this galaxy might not be related to M86.”

    I assume from context that they mean “higher average radial velocity”, not “larger spread of velocity”.

  30. 30.   Clair Says:
    October 8th, 2008 at 7:47 am

    “Now, that line sounds pretty mundane, but think about it: entire galaxies collide! They slam into each other at hundreds of kilometers per second! Billions of stars interact gravitationally! Gas clouds impact creating cosmic fireworks on an epic scale! AIIIIEEEE!!!!!!

    Phew. OK. That’s outta my system now.”

    Phil, I love your enthusiasm! :-)

  31. 31.   Information Security Says:
    October 8th, 2008 at 4:33 pm

    I don’t see galaxies colliding, just the FSM and his noodly appendage…

  32. 32.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    October 10th, 2008 at 5:32 am

    Invader Xan -

    The green colour probably occurs for one of two reasons:

    EITHER the gas is moving rapidly towards us and its emission is very, very blue-shifted,

    OR the entire image is false-coloured (as so many astrophotos are), and this material was coloured green to distinguish it from other components of the image.

    I think the latter is more likely.

  33. 33.   Greg Says:
    October 12th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

    looks like sunglasses or / either a celestial bra ..virgo’s bra ! lol

  34. 34.   anon Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 4:18 pm

    I don’t see galaxies colliding, just the FSM and his noodly appendage…

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us