DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Ares hardware arrives at Kennedy
President-elect Obama »

Doctor Who Christmas special trailer

Just to take your mind of politics for a moment…

I saw this at Comic Con a few months ago, but it’s airing in England now. It’s a one-minute long trailer for the Doctor Who Christmas special.

Duh: spoilers!


Two things:

1) Cybermen! Woohoo!

2) I remember seeing a longer version of this at Comic Con. I may be mistaken, but we’ll see if a longer one surfaces. Either way, I’m looking forward to seeing new Who!

Tip o’ the TARDIS to Planet Gallifrey.

Share

November 4th, 2008 3:00 PM by Phil Plait in SciFi, TV/Movies | 27 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

27 Responses to “Doctor Who Christmas special trailer”

  1. 1.   Naked Bunny with a Whip Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 3:49 pm

    Cybermen!

    *groan*

  2. 2.   PhilB Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 4:06 pm

    All I want for Christmas is for the Who team to finally rewatch Tomb of the Cybermen and remember what they were supposed to be like.

  3. 3.   Mark Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    I for one welcome our new machine overlord… undoubtedly in league with everything mechanical trying to take over the world: ;)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSEOXRLSpVc

  4. 4.   IVAN3MAN Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    Phil Plait, you’re always going on about Dr. Who, but you’ve never mentioned the two Dr. Who movies featuring Peter Cushing as the Doctor: Dr Who and the Daleks and Daleks — Invasion Earth 2150 AD. What’s your opinion of them? Do you, like a lot of traditional Dr Who fans, not consider them ‘canon’?

  5. 5.   Naked Bunny with a Whip Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 4:09 pm

    I don’t mind the new Cybermen, or the current take on the Daleks, but man, they are just being used to death!

  6. 6.   Starviking Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    England? ENGLAND!?

    It’s the BBC – not the EBC you know…

    (Of course UKBC would be better – but hey, what’re ya gonna do?

  7. 7.   KillerChihuahua Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 4:24 pm

    Naked Bunny has nailed it – its not the new Cybermen, its not the Daleks, its that they have used them to freakin’ death already. What, no new ideas? No math planets? No places where physics is slightly different? No new nemeses? (how do you spell the plural of nemsis, anyway?)

    and the Daleks keep getting defeated, the last of them, for once and forever… oh, until the next time.

  8. 8.   Starviking Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 5:04 pm

    The New Who needs some Ice Warriorsssss if you ask me!

  9. 9.   Bobalee Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 6:27 pm

    you’re all right, Daleks and Cybermen are fun, but they are used too much. Lets get back to the orginal 6 Doctors. We travel all over the universe, in the past or the future and kept running into new adventures. Doctors’ 9 & 10 have barely left the planet. It’s all about the Doctor’s relationship with women anymore.
    Speaking about Rose, in the other dimension that she and the clone Doctor is in. What if Gallifrey still exists and a Doctor exists in that dmension?

  10. 10.   John Keller Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 6:57 pm

    It looks like there is at least one oringinal Cyberman (first and second doctor) at time 0.29

  11. 11.   Alex Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 7:09 pm

    Were those… Cybermonkeys?

  12. 12.   Jimmy Joe Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 11:34 pm

    I’d like to see the silurians personally. The cybermen were alright at first… so were the Daleks but… over kill.

  13. 13.   JSW Says:
    November 4th, 2008 at 11:45 pm

    So are these real Cybermen or just another batch of Cybusmen?

  14. 14.   Naomi Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 1:27 am

    Yeah – those who keep saying that the Cybermen are overused, no. We’ve seen the CybUSmen twice. We haven’t seen Mondasian Cybermen back yet, and I’m actually looking forward to when we do!

  15. 15.   OzAtheist Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 2:04 am

    I’m with you guys, how many freakin’ times does the the good Dr have to kill them Daleks?

  16. 16.   BigBob Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 5:07 am

    Woop! Isn’t that Miranda Richardson of Black Adder fame? I repeat, Woop!

  17. 17.   Gareth Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 5:36 am

    It’s even airing in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland! How’s that for a United Kingdom?

  18. 18.   Some Canadian Skeptic Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 6:47 am

    Ahhhh, the Cybermen. Or as I like to call them, “not the Borg”.

  19. 19.   MarkH Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 7:48 am

    Cybermen! Snore! Done to death! Move on to something else!

  20. 20.   Tolls Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 9:25 am

    Using the Cybermen is hardly overkill.
    It’ll have been nigh on two and a half years since they last appeared.

  21. 21.   Gavin Bollard Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    I want to see the Great Intelligence (and possibly the Yeti) return. The posession scenes from the abominable snowmen sound great on audio… I wonder what they looked like.

  22. 22.   IVAN3MAN Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 3:50 pm

    BigBob:

    Woop! Isn’t that Miranda Richardson of Black Adder fame? I repeat, Woop!

    No, it is Dervla Kirwan of Ballykissangel and Goodnight Sweetheart fame.

    Her web-site is: http://www.dervla-kirwan.co.uk/

  23. 23.   kroosing 2 '42' via '37' Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 4:58 pm

    “The Return of the Cybermen”? Blimey! I’m just watching “The Invasion” aka “The Return of the Cybermen” from Season 6 episode 3 (#046) aired in November and December 1968.

    In the introductory narrative retired actor Kevin Stoney says: “It had the working title ‘Return of the Cybermen’. The story was however later retitled ‘The Invasion’ to keep the appearance of the adversaries a surprise until halfway through the story.”
    That made good sense! However, the commentator continues: “Unfortunately in some regions, the Radio Times published a picture of a Cyberman alongside the episode listing of part one. This somewhat spoiled the surprise appearance of the cybermen in part 4.” (www.recons.com/recons/lc19.htm)

    So about spoilers, nothing new under the sun, really. Well, maybe the Cybermen appear very early in this Xmas Special, or the tabloids had already spotted them on the set.
    Funny enough, from this old story parts 1 and 4 don’t exist anymore, like many of the Patrick Troughton episodes. What I am watching is a reconstructed version by Loose Cannon, the production company that reconstructs lost early Doctor Who episodes with in-production photos. In 2006, the missing parts 1 & 4 have been reproduced by the animation studio Cosgrove Hall, who previously created the webcast “Scream of the Shalka”.

    Let’s enjoy the coming Xmas Special though. I’m really in suspense if it will be a rewrite of the old story or a completely new one…

    … Well, no. The old one is a 20th century cold war story and introduction to UNIT, while the décor of the Xmas Special trailer looks more Victorian. Unless of course it is an ‘introductory’ decoy…

    Spoiler for the Return of the Cybermen of 1968: UNIT had a working missile defence system!

  24. 24.   IVAN3MAN Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 5:40 pm

    Phil Plait’s response to my enquiry:

    *Crickets*
  25. 25.   John Paradox Says:
    November 5th, 2008 at 9:06 pm

    Slightly OT:
    Torchwood reference in Knight Rider?

    Watching the new Knight Rider (hey, I got up at 3A to work on reporting the election, needed some brainless viewing), one character “Billy” (played, ironically enough by the same actor who was President Roslin’s assistant on BSG) was asked who he was supposed to be (Halloween episode).. “Captain Jack Harkness”. Response by Bruce Davison: the time travelling bisexual?

    J/P=?

  26. 26.   Reynold Says:
    November 6th, 2008 at 3:34 am

    Well, given how sad this guy’s fetish for Doctor Who is, I thought I’d share some more pain:

    http://community.livejournal.com/doctorwhy/2389.html

  27. 27.   Patrick Says:
    December 23rd, 2008 at 11:33 am

    The way the Cybusmen got portrayed, they didn’t have any teeth. Four Daleks were able to completely pwn them and the Doctor outsmarted them too easily. The Cybusmen are only superior in one respect – dying.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us