<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doctor Who Christmas special trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:52:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-142848</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-142848</guid>
		<description>The way the Cybusmen got portrayed, they didn&#039;t have any teeth.  Four Daleks were able to completely pwn them and the Doctor outsmarted them too easily.  The Cybusmen are only superior in one respect - dying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way the Cybusmen got portrayed, they didn&#8217;t have any teeth.  Four Daleks were able to completely pwn them and the Doctor outsmarted them too easily.  The Cybusmen are only superior in one respect &#8211; dying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reynold</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132187</link>
		<dc:creator>Reynold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132187</guid>
		<description>Well, given how sad this guy&#039;s fetish for Doctor Who is, I thought I&#039;d share some more pain:

http://community.livejournal.com/doctorwhy/2389.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, given how sad this guy&#8217;s fetish for Doctor Who is, I thought I&#8217;d share some more pain:</p>
<p><a href="http://community.livejournal.com/doctorwhy/2389.html" rel="nofollow">http://community.livejournal.com/doctorwhy/2389.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132132</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132132</guid>
		<description>Slightly OT:
Torchwood reference in Knight Rider?

Watching the new Knight Rider (hey, I got up at 3A to work on reporting the election, needed some brainless viewing), one character &quot;Billy&quot; (played, ironically enough by the same actor who was President Roslin&#039;s assistant on BSG) was asked who he was supposed to be (Halloween episode).. &quot;Captain Jack Harkness&quot;.  Response by Bruce Davison: the time travelling bisexual?

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly OT:<br />
Torchwood reference in Knight Rider?</p>
<p>Watching the new Knight Rider (hey, I got up at 3A to work on reporting the election, needed some brainless viewing), one character &#8220;Billy&#8221; (played, ironically enough by the same actor who was President Roslin&#8217;s assistant on BSG) was asked who he was supposed to be (Halloween episode).. &#8220;Captain Jack Harkness&#8221;.  Response by Bruce Davison: the time travelling bisexual?</p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132092</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132092</guid>
		<description>Phil Plait&#039;s response to my enquiry:

&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot; bgcolor=&quot;black&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;+2&quot; color=&quot;yellow&quot;&gt;*Crickets*&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil Plait&#8217;s response to my enquiry:</p>
<table border="1" bgcolor="black">
<tr>
<td align="center"><font size="+2" color="yellow">*Crickets*</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kroosing 2 '42' via '37'</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132086</link>
		<dc:creator>kroosing 2 '42' via '37'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132086</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Return of the Cybermen&quot;?  Blimey!  I&#039;m just watching &quot;The Invasion&quot; aka &quot;The Return of the Cybermen&quot; from Season 6 episode 3 (#046) aired in November and December 1968.

In the introductory narrative retired actor Kevin Stoney says:   &quot;It had the working title &#039;Return of the Cybermen&#039;.  The story was however later retitled &#039;The Invasion&#039; to keep the appearance of the adversaries a surprise until halfway through the story.&quot;  
That made good sense!  However, the commentator continues:  &quot;Unfortunately in some regions, the Radio Times published a picture of a Cyberman alongside the episode listing of part one.  This somewhat spoiled the surprise appearance of the cybermen in part 4.&quot;  (www.recons.com/recons/lc19.htm)

So about spoilers, nothing new under the sun, really.  Well, maybe the Cybermen appear very early in this Xmas Special, or the tabloids had already spotted them on the set.
Funny enough, from this old story parts 1 and 4 don&#039;t exist anymore, like many of the Patrick Troughton episodes.  What I am watching is a reconstructed version by Loose Cannon, the production company that reconstructs lost early Doctor Who episodes with in-production photos.  In 2006, the missing parts 1 &amp; 4 have been reproduced by the animation studio Cosgrove Hall, who previously created the webcast &quot;Scream of the Shalka&quot;.

Let&#039;s enjoy the coming Xmas Special though.  I&#039;m really in suspense if it will be a rewrite of the old story or a completely new one... 

... Well, no.  The old one is a 20th century cold war story and introduction to UNIT, while the décor of the Xmas Special trailer looks more Victorian.  Unless of course it is an &#039;introductory&#039; decoy...

Spoiler for the Return of the Cybermen of 1968:  UNIT had a working missile defence system!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Return of the Cybermen&#8221;?  Blimey!  I&#8217;m just watching &#8220;The Invasion&#8221; aka &#8220;The Return of the Cybermen&#8221; from Season 6 episode 3 (#046) aired in November and December 1968.</p>
<p>In the introductory narrative retired actor Kevin Stoney says:   &#8220;It had the working title &#8216;Return of the Cybermen&#8217;.  The story was however later retitled &#8216;The Invasion&#8217; to keep the appearance of the adversaries a surprise until halfway through the story.&#8221;<br />
That made good sense!  However, the commentator continues:  &#8220;Unfortunately in some regions, the Radio Times published a picture of a Cyberman alongside the episode listing of part one.  This somewhat spoiled the surprise appearance of the cybermen in part 4.&#8221;  (www.recons.com/recons/lc19.htm)</p>
<p>So about spoilers, nothing new under the sun, really.  Well, maybe the Cybermen appear very early in this Xmas Special, or the tabloids had already spotted them on the set.<br />
Funny enough, from this old story parts 1 and 4 don&#8217;t exist anymore, like many of the Patrick Troughton episodes.  What I am watching is a reconstructed version by Loose Cannon, the production company that reconstructs lost early Doctor Who episodes with in-production photos.  In 2006, the missing parts 1 &#038; 4 have been reproduced by the animation studio Cosgrove Hall, who previously created the webcast &#8220;Scream of the Shalka&#8221;.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s enjoy the coming Xmas Special though.  I&#8217;m really in suspense if it will be a rewrite of the old story or a completely new one&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; Well, no.  The old one is a 20th century cold war story and introduction to UNIT, while the décor of the Xmas Special trailer looks more Victorian.  Unless of course it is an &#8216;introductory&#8217; decoy&#8230;</p>
<p>Spoiler for the Return of the Cybermen of 1968:  UNIT had a working missile defence system!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132069</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132069</guid>
		<description>BigBob:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Woop! Isn’t that Miranda Richardson of Black Adder fame? I repeat, Woop!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, it is &lt;b&gt;Dervla Kirwan&lt;/b&gt; of &lt;i&gt;Ballykissangel&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Goodnight Sweetheart&lt;/i&gt; fame.

Her web-site is:  http://www.dervla-kirwan.co.uk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigBob:</p>
<blockquote><p>Woop! Isn’t that Miranda Richardson of Black Adder fame? I repeat, Woop!</p></blockquote>
<p>No, it is <b>Dervla Kirwan</b> of <i>Ballykissangel</i> and <i>Goodnight Sweetheart</i> fame.</p>
<p>Her web-site is:  <a href="http://www.dervla-kirwan.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dervla-kirwan.co.uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Bollard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132002</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Bollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132002</guid>
		<description>I want to see the Great Intelligence (and possibly the Yeti) return.  The posession scenes from the abominable snowmen sound great on audio...  I wonder what they looked like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see the Great Intelligence (and possibly the Yeti) return.  The posession scenes from the abominable snowmen sound great on audio&#8230;  I wonder what they looked like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
