<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doctor Who Christmas special trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:23:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-142848</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-142848</guid>
		<description>The way the Cybusmen got portrayed, they didn&#039;t have any teeth.  Four Daleks were able to completely pwn them and the Doctor outsmarted them too easily.  The Cybusmen are only superior in one respect - dying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way the Cybusmen got portrayed, they didn&#8217;t have any teeth.  Four Daleks were able to completely pwn them and the Doctor outsmarted them too easily.  The Cybusmen are only superior in one respect &#8211; dying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reynold</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132187</link>
		<dc:creator>Reynold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132187</guid>
		<description>Well, given how sad this guy&#039;s fetish for Doctor Who is, I thought I&#039;d share some more pain:

http://community.livejournal.com/doctorwhy/2389.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, given how sad this guy&#8217;s fetish for Doctor Who is, I thought I&#8217;d share some more pain:</p>
<p><a href="http://community.livejournal.com/doctorwhy/2389.html" rel="nofollow">http://community.livejournal.com/doctorwhy/2389.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Paradox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132132</link>
		<dc:creator>John Paradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132132</guid>
		<description>Slightly OT:
Torchwood reference in Knight Rider?

Watching the new Knight Rider (hey, I got up at 3A to work on reporting the election, needed some brainless viewing), one character &quot;Billy&quot; (played, ironically enough by the same actor who was President Roslin&#039;s assistant on BSG) was asked who he was supposed to be (Halloween episode).. &quot;Captain Jack Harkness&quot;.  Response by Bruce Davison: the time travelling bisexual?

J/P=?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly OT:<br />
Torchwood reference in Knight Rider?</p>
<p>Watching the new Knight Rider (hey, I got up at 3A to work on reporting the election, needed some brainless viewing), one character &#8220;Billy&#8221; (played, ironically enough by the same actor who was President Roslin&#8217;s assistant on BSG) was asked who he was supposed to be (Halloween episode).. &#8220;Captain Jack Harkness&#8221;.  Response by Bruce Davison: the time travelling bisexual?</p>
<p>J/P=?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132092</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132092</guid>
		<description>Phil Plait&#039;s response to my enquiry:

&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot; bgcolor=&quot;black&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;+2&quot; color=&quot;yellow&quot;&gt;*Crickets*&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil Plait&#8217;s response to my enquiry:</p>
<table border="1" bgcolor="black">
<tr>
<td align="center"><font size="+2" color="yellow">*Crickets*</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kroosing 2 '42' via '37'</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132086</link>
		<dc:creator>kroosing 2 '42' via '37'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132086</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Return of the Cybermen&quot;?  Blimey!  I&#039;m just watching &quot;The Invasion&quot; aka &quot;The Return of the Cybermen&quot; from Season 6 episode 3 (#046) aired in November and December 1968.

In the introductory narrative retired actor Kevin Stoney says:   &quot;It had the working title &#039;Return of the Cybermen&#039;.  The story was however later retitled &#039;The Invasion&#039; to keep the appearance of the adversaries a surprise until halfway through the story.&quot;  
That made good sense!  However, the commentator continues:  &quot;Unfortunately in some regions, the Radio Times published a picture of a Cyberman alongside the episode listing of part one.  This somewhat spoiled the surprise appearance of the cybermen in part 4.&quot;  (www.recons.com/recons/lc19.htm)

So about spoilers, nothing new under the sun, really.  Well, maybe the Cybermen appear very early in this Xmas Special, or the tabloids had already spotted them on the set.
Funny enough, from this old story parts 1 and 4 don&#039;t exist anymore, like many of the Patrick Troughton episodes.  What I am watching is a reconstructed version by Loose Cannon, the production company that reconstructs lost early Doctor Who episodes with in-production photos.  In 2006, the missing parts 1 &amp; 4 have been reproduced by the animation studio Cosgrove Hall, who previously created the webcast &quot;Scream of the Shalka&quot;.

Let&#039;s enjoy the coming Xmas Special though.  I&#039;m really in suspense if it will be a rewrite of the old story or a completely new one... 

... Well, no.  The old one is a 20th century cold war story and introduction to UNIT, while the décor of the Xmas Special trailer looks more Victorian.  Unless of course it is an &#039;introductory&#039; decoy...

Spoiler for the Return of the Cybermen of 1968:  UNIT had a working missile defence system!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Return of the Cybermen&#8221;?  Blimey!  I&#8217;m just watching &#8220;The Invasion&#8221; aka &#8220;The Return of the Cybermen&#8221; from Season 6 episode 3 (#046) aired in November and December 1968.</p>
<p>In the introductory narrative retired actor Kevin Stoney says:   &#8220;It had the working title &#8216;Return of the Cybermen&#8217;.  The story was however later retitled &#8216;The Invasion&#8217; to keep the appearance of the adversaries a surprise until halfway through the story.&#8221;<br />
That made good sense!  However, the commentator continues:  &#8220;Unfortunately in some regions, the Radio Times published a picture of a Cyberman alongside the episode listing of part one.  This somewhat spoiled the surprise appearance of the cybermen in part 4.&#8221;  (www.recons.com/recons/lc19.htm)</p>
<p>So about spoilers, nothing new under the sun, really.  Well, maybe the Cybermen appear very early in this Xmas Special, or the tabloids had already spotted them on the set.<br />
Funny enough, from this old story parts 1 and 4 don&#8217;t exist anymore, like many of the Patrick Troughton episodes.  What I am watching is a reconstructed version by Loose Cannon, the production company that reconstructs lost early Doctor Who episodes with in-production photos.  In 2006, the missing parts 1 &#038; 4 have been reproduced by the animation studio Cosgrove Hall, who previously created the webcast &#8220;Scream of the Shalka&#8221;.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s enjoy the coming Xmas Special though.  I&#8217;m really in suspense if it will be a rewrite of the old story or a completely new one&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; Well, no.  The old one is a 20th century cold war story and introduction to UNIT, while the décor of the Xmas Special trailer looks more Victorian.  Unless of course it is an &#8216;introductory&#8217; decoy&#8230;</p>
<p>Spoiler for the Return of the Cybermen of 1968:  UNIT had a working missile defence system!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132069</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132069</guid>
		<description>BigBob:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Woop! Isn’t that Miranda Richardson of Black Adder fame? I repeat, Woop!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, it is &lt;b&gt;Dervla Kirwan&lt;/b&gt; of &lt;i&gt;Ballykissangel&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Goodnight Sweetheart&lt;/i&gt; fame.

Her web-site is:  http://www.dervla-kirwan.co.uk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigBob:</p>
<blockquote><p>Woop! Isn’t that Miranda Richardson of Black Adder fame? I repeat, Woop!</p></blockquote>
<p>No, it is <b>Dervla Kirwan</b> of <i>Ballykissangel</i> and <i>Goodnight Sweetheart</i> fame.</p>
<p>Her web-site is:  <a href="http://www.dervla-kirwan.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dervla-kirwan.co.uk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Bollard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-132002</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Bollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-132002</guid>
		<description>I want to see the Great Intelligence (and possibly the Yeti) return.  The posession scenes from the abominable snowmen sound great on audio...  I wonder what they looked like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see the Great Intelligence (and possibly the Yeti) return.  The posession scenes from the abominable snowmen sound great on audio&#8230;  I wonder what they looked like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tolls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131903</link>
		<dc:creator>Tolls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131903</guid>
		<description>Using the Cybermen is hardly overkill.
It&#039;ll have been nigh on two and a half years since they last appeared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the Cybermen is hardly overkill.<br />
It&#8217;ll have been nigh on two and a half years since they last appeared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131846</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131846</guid>
		<description>Cybermen! Snore! Done to death! Move on to something else!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybermen! Snore! Done to death! Move on to something else!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Canadian Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131799</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Canadian Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131799</guid>
		<description>Ahhhh, the Cybermen.  Or as I like to call them, &quot;not the Borg&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhhh, the Cybermen.  Or as I like to call them, &#8220;not the Borg&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131773</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131773</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s even airing in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland! How&#039;s that for a United Kingdom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s even airing in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland! How&#8217;s that for a United Kingdom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131763</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131763</guid>
		<description>Woop!  Isn&#039;t that Miranda Richardson of Black Adder fame?  I repeat, Woop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woop!  Isn&#8217;t that Miranda Richardson of Black Adder fame?  I repeat, Woop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OzAtheist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131725</link>
		<dc:creator>OzAtheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131725</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you guys, how many freakin&#039; times does the the good Dr have to kill them Daleks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you guys, how many freakin&#8217; times does the the good Dr have to kill them Daleks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naomi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131718</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131718</guid>
		<description>Yeah - those who keep saying that the Cybermen are overused, no. We&#039;ve seen the CybUSmen twice. We haven&#039;t seen Mondasian Cybermen back yet, and I&#039;m actually looking forward to when we do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; those who keep saying that the Cybermen are overused, no. We&#8217;ve seen the CybUSmen twice. We haven&#8217;t seen Mondasian Cybermen back yet, and I&#8217;m actually looking forward to when we do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131692</link>
		<dc:creator>JSW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 06:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131692</guid>
		<description>So are these real Cybermen or just another batch of Cybusmen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are these real Cybermen or just another batch of Cybusmen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131680</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 06:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131680</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see the silurians personally. The cybermen were alright at first... so were the Daleks but... over kill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see the silurians personally. The cybermen were alright at first&#8230; so were the Daleks but&#8230; over kill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131548</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131548</guid>
		<description>Were those... Cybermonkeys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were those&#8230; Cybermonkeys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Keller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131547</link>
		<dc:creator>John Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131547</guid>
		<description>It looks like there is at least one oringinal Cyberman (first and second doctor) at time 0.29</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like there is at least one oringinal Cyberman (first and second doctor) at time 0.29</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobalee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131545</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobalee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131545</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re all right, Daleks and Cybermen are fun, but they are used too much. Lets get back to the orginal 6 Doctors. We travel all over the universe, in the past or the future and kept running into new adventures.  Doctors&#039; 9 &amp; 10 have barely left the planet. It&#039;s all about the Doctor&#039;s relationship with women anymore.
Speaking about Rose, in the other dimension that she and the clone Doctor is in. What if Gallifrey still exists and a Doctor exists in that dmension?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re all right, Daleks and Cybermen are fun, but they are used too much. Lets get back to the orginal 6 Doctors. We travel all over the universe, in the past or the future and kept running into new adventures.  Doctors&#8217; 9 &#038; 10 have barely left the planet. It&#8217;s all about the Doctor&#8217;s relationship with women anymore.<br />
Speaking about Rose, in the other dimension that she and the clone Doctor is in. What if Gallifrey still exists and a Doctor exists in that dmension?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starviking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131531</link>
		<dc:creator>Starviking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131531</guid>
		<description>The New Who needs some Ice Warriorsssss if you ask me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Who needs some Ice Warriorsssss if you ask me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KillerChihuahua</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131524</link>
		<dc:creator>KillerChihuahua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131524</guid>
		<description>Naked Bunny has nailed it - its not the new Cybermen, its not the Daleks, its that they have used them to freakin&#039; death already. What, no new ideas? No math planets? No places where physics is slightly different? No new nemeses? (how do you spell the plural of nemsis, anyway?) 

and the Daleks &lt;i&gt;keep&lt;/i&gt; getting defeated, the last of them, for once and forever... oh, until the next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naked Bunny has nailed it &#8211; its not the new Cybermen, its not the Daleks, its that they have used them to freakin&#8217; death already. What, no new ideas? No math planets? No places where physics is slightly different? No new nemeses? (how do you spell the plural of nemsis, anyway?) </p>
<p>and the Daleks <i>keep</i> getting defeated, the last of them, for once and forever&#8230; oh, until the next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starviking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131521</link>
		<dc:creator>Starviking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131521</guid>
		<description>England? ENGLAND!?

It&#039;s the BBC - not the EBC you know...

(Of course UKBC would be better - but hey, what&#039;re ya gonna do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>England? ENGLAND!?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the BBC &#8211; not the EBC you know&#8230;</p>
<p>(Of course UKBC would be better &#8211; but hey, what&#8217;re ya gonna do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naked Bunny with a Whip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131520</link>
		<dc:creator>Naked Bunny with a Whip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131520</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind the new Cybermen, or the current take on the Daleks, but man, they are just being used to death!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the new Cybermen, or the current take on the Daleks, but man, they are just being used to death!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131519</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131519</guid>
		<description>Phil Plait, you&#039;re always going on about Dr. Who, but you&#039;ve never mentioned the two Dr. Who movies featuring Peter Cushing as the Doctor: &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dr Who and the Daleks&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Daleks -- Invasion Earth 2150 AD&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;. What&#039;s your opinion of them? Do you, like a lot of traditional Dr Who fans, not consider them &#039;canon&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil Plait, you&#8217;re always going on about Dr. Who, but you&#8217;ve never mentioned the two Dr. Who movies featuring Peter Cushing as the Doctor: <b><i>Dr Who and the Daleks</i></b> and <b><i>Daleks &#8212; Invasion Earth 2150 AD</i></b>. What&#8217;s your opinion of them? Do you, like a lot of traditional Dr Who fans, not consider them &#8216;canon&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-131517</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/04/doctor-who-christmas-special-trailer/#comment-131517</guid>
		<description>I for one welcome our new machine overlord... undoubtedly in league with everything mechanical trying to take over the world: ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSEOXRLSpVc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one welcome our new machine overlord&#8230; undoubtedly in league with everything mechanical trying to take over the world: <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSEOXRLSpVc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSEOXRLSpVc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 18:28:03 -->
