<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aliens? Yes. UFOs? No.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-481010</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-481010</guid>
		<description>Sure. There might be aliens in the universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure. There might be aliens in the universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Elliott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-434367</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-434367</guid>
		<description>DISCOVER what? 
    If you represent this mag, nothing will get discovered with what I just read. Have you not watched (on you tube) the last (2) ea. National Press conferences on UFO&#039;S with speakers from our retired military and the last one with foreign retired military? Check out the response of our retired FAA Chief on our military cover-up in our skies. You could not Discover anything in front of you! - and I will quit reading your rag. 
   Everyone says &quot;lets take the Scientific approach&quot; but filters the info for their own use - sounds like the Devil is involved.

Paul Elliott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DISCOVER what?<br />
    If you represent this mag, nothing will get discovered with what I just read. Have you not watched (on you tube) the last (2) ea. National Press conferences on UFO&#8217;S with speakers from our retired military and the last one with foreign retired military? Check out the response of our retired FAA Chief on our military cover-up in our skies. You could not Discover anything in front of you! &#8211; and I will quit reading your rag.<br />
   Everyone says &#8220;lets take the Scientific approach&#8221; but filters the info for their own use &#8211; sounds like the Devil is involved.</p>
<p>Paul Elliott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Ramos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-367241</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Ramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-367241</guid>
		<description>The above article is interesting. Much more interesting are the many responses that ensued. Many are believers in Earth-visiting exterrestrials while a few are not. 

I am from the camp that UFOs and alien abductions are a complete myth. Space science entered into popular culture when scientists speculated the possibility of space travel during the late 1940&#039;s. During the 1920&#039;s and 1930&#039;s, pulp fiction magazines were filled with imaginative stories that included space aliens abducting humans. 

Science-fiction writer H.P. Lovecraft wrote stories about aliens coming long ago to interfere with ancient civilizations. But the UFO myth was taking shape even before that. During the late 1890&#039;s, Americans were seeing flying machines in the skies, where some speculated they could be from Mars. This was contemporary with H.G. Wells&#039; &quot;War of the Worlds.&quot; During Wells&#039; time, it was known about the speculation of a possible Martian civilization. 

Kenneth Arnold saw a Flying Saucer in 1947, sparking others to do the same, as they were influenced by media sensation of Arnold&#039;s sighting. Then, the 1950&#039;s came along with the contactees. Besides the hoaxers, many of them thought the end of the world was near. 

In short, UFOs and alien abductions are a complete myth. In my book, &quot;How Modern Society Invented UFOs,&quot; my main point is that secularism brought on an age of anxiety, confusion, paranoia, and even spiritual emptiness. Where the ancients had their gods, some in the West have aliens from outer space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above article is interesting. Much more interesting are the many responses that ensued. Many are believers in Earth-visiting exterrestrials while a few are not. </p>
<p>I am from the camp that UFOs and alien abductions are a complete myth. Space science entered into popular culture when scientists speculated the possibility of space travel during the late 1940&#8242;s. During the 1920&#8242;s and 1930&#8242;s, pulp fiction magazines were filled with imaginative stories that included space aliens abducting humans. </p>
<p>Science-fiction writer H.P. Lovecraft wrote stories about aliens coming long ago to interfere with ancient civilizations. But the UFO myth was taking shape even before that. During the late 1890&#8242;s, Americans were seeing flying machines in the skies, where some speculated they could be from Mars. This was contemporary with H.G. Wells&#8217; &#8220;War of the Worlds.&#8221; During Wells&#8217; time, it was known about the speculation of a possible Martian civilization. </p>
<p>Kenneth Arnold saw a Flying Saucer in 1947, sparking others to do the same, as they were influenced by media sensation of Arnold&#8217;s sighting. Then, the 1950&#8242;s came along with the contactees. Besides the hoaxers, many of them thought the end of the world was near. </p>
<p>In short, UFOs and alien abductions are a complete myth. In my book, &#8220;How Modern Society Invented UFOs,&#8221; my main point is that secularism brought on an age of anxiety, confusion, paranoia, and even spiritual emptiness. Where the ancients had their gods, some in the West have aliens from outer space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel A. Florentine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-346430</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel A. Florentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-346430</guid>
		<description>Think of how much older than earth some of those planets could be- millions of years, meaning their life started millions of years before ours, meaning they are millions of years ahead of us. Certainly we will learn more about gravity by that time resulting in high speed space craft. I have personally witnessed an amazing sight about a year ago. At first me and my friends thought  it was a meteor shower or maybe something similar but after watching for a couple of minutes we saw many of them slowing to a stop and going in completely different directions. Any thoughts on that Mr. Astronomy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of how much older than earth some of those planets could be- millions of years, meaning their life started millions of years before ours, meaning they are millions of years ahead of us. Certainly we will learn more about gravity by that time resulting in high speed space craft. I have personally witnessed an amazing sight about a year ago. At first me and my friends thought  it was a meteor shower or maybe something similar but after watching for a couple of minutes we saw many of them slowing to a stop and going in completely different directions. Any thoughts on that Mr. Astronomy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-344806</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-344806</guid>
		<description>I believe that their is ,why? Because their about somewhere in our galaxy in 100 to 200 billion stars. And ownly one have highly intelligent life that could try to contact a other world? Right, even if that one out of 10thousand stars that could have life on it. And even if itelligent life and are equal of several hundred or several thousands ahead of us. It verry likely that their sending probes too. If it&#039;s for the same reason we are doing it. 

I can&#039;t believe we are alone in the universe never mind in this galaxy. Maybe this part of the galaxy doesn&#039;t have the intelligent life to do it. But but us. If you figure if the clostest adavanced life about a radius of 100 to 300 light years. It is about 419 square light years to 1257 square light years that is alot area to be alone. And just being somewhat careful in that calcalion . They could be closer than that . It just a guess. But it provide the point. And that a small part of our galaxy. Even mind a much larger radius. 

There are still many that don&#039;t want to believe it is possibly true. Because they don&#039;t want to believe  it is remotely possable that could do it. And still need the ET Hillton towel to see it true. I believe you should be a little skeptical but, if you see it. And clear as day. It close a nuff to see the shape and the being flying it. You still can&#039;t say possible . They can&#039;t believe it true because it&#039;s not in their logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that their is ,why? Because their about somewhere in our galaxy in 100 to 200 billion stars. And ownly one have highly intelligent life that could try to contact a other world? Right, even if that one out of 10thousand stars that could have life on it. And even if itelligent life and are equal of several hundred or several thousands ahead of us. It verry likely that their sending probes too. If it&#8217;s for the same reason we are doing it. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe we are alone in the universe never mind in this galaxy. Maybe this part of the galaxy doesn&#8217;t have the intelligent life to do it. But but us. If you figure if the clostest adavanced life about a radius of 100 to 300 light years. It is about 419 square light years to 1257 square light years that is alot area to be alone. And just being somewhat careful in that calcalion . They could be closer than that . It just a guess. But it provide the point. And that a small part of our galaxy. Even mind a much larger radius. </p>
<p>There are still many that don&#8217;t want to believe it is possibly true. Because they don&#8217;t want to believe  it is remotely possable that could do it. And still need the ET Hillton towel to see it true. I believe you should be a little skeptical but, if you see it. And clear as day. It close a nuff to see the shape and the being flying it. You still can&#8217;t say possible . They can&#8217;t believe it true because it&#8217;s not in their logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Loving</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-259881</link>
		<dc:creator>James Loving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-259881</guid>
		<description>I image that aliens would have a survey program being carried out as related to nuclear reactors.  Furthermore, I have been looking at a recent group of videos from Youtube with a writer, J. Chisholm claiming that the writer is going to be putting out a book on videographic and photographic methods for ufo hunting.  I say, if there is going to be a book on UFO hunting where actual methods are put out into the public sphere, that is a good thing.  Hopefully that will be a good book.

It seems to me historically that science, and by science I mean the examination of evidence by direct observation, rather than opinion, always starts with someone putting together a set of methods, and instruments, that facilitate the collection of data. 

I think this is the case with UFOs....ufos may be visiting our planet, and, if you think about it, Projects like SETI, may be missing this fact because they are using the wrong set of tools.  So what I think is needed is an instrument maker, someone who provides the tools to the general public, scientists, etc., which allow the examination of direct evidence, or not, of UFOs.

Anyways, that is just my two cents worth.  I think that is a better approach than looking at dusty old anecdotal records from Roswell, or, people who have a vested interest in saying &quot;yes there are aliens&quot; and &quot;no there are not aliens&quot; based on some monetary return.

James Loving</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I image that aliens would have a survey program being carried out as related to nuclear reactors.  Furthermore, I have been looking at a recent group of videos from Youtube with a writer, J. Chisholm claiming that the writer is going to be putting out a book on videographic and photographic methods for ufo hunting.  I say, if there is going to be a book on UFO hunting where actual methods are put out into the public sphere, that is a good thing.  Hopefully that will be a good book.</p>
<p>It seems to me historically that science, and by science I mean the examination of evidence by direct observation, rather than opinion, always starts with someone putting together a set of methods, and instruments, that facilitate the collection of data. </p>
<p>I think this is the case with UFOs&#8230;.ufos may be visiting our planet, and, if you think about it, Projects like SETI, may be missing this fact because they are using the wrong set of tools.  So what I think is needed is an instrument maker, someone who provides the tools to the general public, scientists, etc., which allow the examination of direct evidence, or not, of UFOs.</p>
<p>Anyways, that is just my two cents worth.  I think that is a better approach than looking at dusty old anecdotal records from Roswell, or, people who have a vested interest in saying &#8220;yes there are aliens&#8221; and &#8220;no there are not aliens&#8221; based on some monetary return.</p>
<p>James Loving</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-258588</link>
		<dc:creator>ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-258588</guid>
		<description>hi my name is ruben i saw a ufo in the sky in the star</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi my name is ruben i saw a ufo in the sky in the star</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-258585</link>
		<dc:creator>ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-258585</guid>
		<description>i see a ufo out side  of my house</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i see a ufo out side  of my house</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MR GREER</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-233443</link>
		<dc:creator>MR GREER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-233443</guid>
		<description>UK TR3B2 
  Category   Videos &amp;
 Title   The Phil Schneider Story 
  Category  ALSO Videos Actual video of MIG 21 in pursuit of cylindrical UFO
OPEN YOUR EYES... 

FACT FACT FACT FACT
Well I am a fan of  Gary McKinnon and Have knowlage of Tracking tools and hacking spy  file450  legel applications and un hack me  you gan order online called (un hack me - 4&#039;5) I can&#039;t Hack yet may self olny track the driffrences is in the eyes of the law !I would like to find ancers too About Suppressd technology .And The law did not resolve it like here in newzealand police and The teenage hacker called snow Newzealand  teenage hacker charges were droped dropped causing economic losses of $20 million. The 18 year old was arrested in December 2007 after an FBI investigation. Walker was later released without a conviction !! Gary McKinnon DID NOT DAMAGE ANY THING!!.walker says he is TelstraClear, had hired Walker now and even NZ police .May  I get a ride in a ufo down to the south pole to see the pola Beers.May be Gary is not in jail? I would say that The peopel will see Super kiwis we did split the atom .FACT FACT FACT FACT. FROM DAVID RS GREER WITH ASPERGERS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK TR3B2<br />
  Category   Videos &#038;<br />
 Title   The Phil Schneider Story<br />
  Category  ALSO Videos Actual video of MIG 21 in pursuit of cylindrical UFO<br />
OPEN YOUR EYES&#8230; </p>
<p>FACT FACT FACT FACT<br />
Well I am a fan of  Gary McKinnon and Have knowlage of Tracking tools and hacking spy  file450  legel applications and un hack me  you gan order online called (un hack me &#8211; 4&#8217;5) I can&#8217;t Hack yet may self olny track the driffrences is in the eyes of the law !I would like to find ancers too About Suppressd technology .And The law did not resolve it like here in newzealand police and The teenage hacker called snow Newzealand  teenage hacker charges were droped dropped causing economic losses of $20 million. The 18 year old was arrested in December 2007 after an FBI investigation. Walker was later released without a conviction !! Gary McKinnon DID NOT DAMAGE ANY THING!!.walker says he is TelstraClear, had hired Walker now and even NZ police .May  I get a ride in a ufo down to the south pole to see the pola Beers.May be Gary is not in jail? I would say that The peopel will see Super kiwis we did split the atom .FACT FACT FACT FACT. FROM DAVID RS GREER WITH ASPERGERS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aliens? Yes. UFOs? No. &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine &#124; Majestic51.com - world of the weird!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-231212</link>
		<dc:creator>Aliens? Yes. UFOs? No. &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine &#124; Majestic51.com - world of the weird!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-231212</guid>
		<description>[...] this link: Aliens? Yes. UFOs? No. &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine Submit this to Script &amp; StyleShare this on BlinklistShare this on del.icio.usDigg this!Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this link: Aliens? Yes. UFOs? No. | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine Submit this to Script &amp; StyleShare this on BlinklistShare this on del.icio.usDigg this!Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Haggard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-223405</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Haggard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-223405</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I would like to formally retract all statements made previously regarding this topic. 

UFO&#039;s are nothing more than the definition of the acronym: Unidentified Flying Objects.

This does NOT equate to &quot;alien spacecraft&quot;. It simply implies the object is unknown in nature. Nothing more, nothing less. 

Anyone who implies the United States government knows more than they have disclosed prior regarding UFO&#039;s is making an assumption. An assumption that cannot be backed up nor substantiated by evidence, physical, circumstantial, or otherwise. 

Any claims that UFO&#039;s are anything other than natural or man-made phenomena are undeniably false and should be ignored.

Regards,
Alan Haggard
San Diego, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I would like to formally retract all statements made previously regarding this topic. </p>
<p>UFO&#8217;s are nothing more than the definition of the acronym: Unidentified Flying Objects.</p>
<p>This does NOT equate to &#8220;alien spacecraft&#8221;. It simply implies the object is unknown in nature. Nothing more, nothing less. </p>
<p>Anyone who implies the United States government knows more than they have disclosed prior regarding UFO&#8217;s is making an assumption. An assumption that cannot be backed up nor substantiated by evidence, physical, circumstantial, or otherwise. </p>
<p>Any claims that UFO&#8217;s are anything other than natural or man-made phenomena are undeniably false and should be ignored.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Alan Haggard<br />
San Diego, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The ABCs of skepticism &#171; Athena</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-223049</link>
		<dc:creator>The ABCs of skepticism &#171; Athena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-223049</guid>
		<description>[...] Unidentified, the definition’s specific, But it doesn’t stop cranks thinking they’re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unidentified, the definition’s specific, But it doesn’t stop cranks thinking they’re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-213576</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-213576</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s  throw  away  all  the  evidence  that  the  debunkers  argue  against  and  clear  the  playing  field...  so  to  speak.

We  have  enough  scientific  data  through  years  of  exploration  and  development  right  now  from  geology,  archeology,  astronomy,  chemistry,  biology,  engineering,  history,  etc.,  etc.,  to  realize  the  vastness  of  space,  our  galaxy,  distances,  gravity,  masses,  gases,  and  many  aspects  of  the  known  universe,  to  easily  rationalize  the  abundance  of  life  throughout  the  universe.   I  think  we&#039;ve  all  come  to  terms  on  that  front.

Four  billion  stars  in  our  galaxy  alone !     And  how  many  galaxies  in  the  universe...  probably  trillions  !

You  need  proof  of  aliens  and  ufos  ?    Well,   we  don&#039;t  have  a  clue  as  to  how  vast  and  complicated  life-forms  could  possibly  be  in  this  universe,  so  we  may  not  recognize  evidence  even  if  it  were  right  up  under  our  nose  !      On  the  astronomical  scale,  humans  have  the  life-span  of  a  tic  or  a  fly,  and  the  universe  is  at  least  13.5  billion  years  old.   Don&#039;t  you  think  that  there  are  things  and  life-forms  so  old  beyond  our  comprehension  that  we  may  not  be  capable  of  detecting  it  with  our  limited  senses  ???  

My  point  is  simple.   Earth  grounded  human-beings  need  to  get  up  off  their  arrogance  and  skepticism,  and  start  thinking  with  an  open-mindedness  rather  than  a  closed  minded  approach  to  life  and  aliens. 

Think  of  the  size  of  an  ant  compared  to  a  human-being.  Think  of  the  size  of  earth  compared  to  the  size  of  the  sun.    There  are  layers  and  scales  beyond  our  imaginations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s  throw  away  all  the  evidence  that  the  debunkers  argue  against  and  clear  the  playing  field&#8230;  so  to  speak.</p>
<p>We  have  enough  scientific  data  through  years  of  exploration  and  development  right  now  from  geology,  archeology,  astronomy,  chemistry,  biology,  engineering,  history,  etc.,  etc.,  to  realize  the  vastness  of  space,  our  galaxy,  distances,  gravity,  masses,  gases,  and  many  aspects  of  the  known  universe,  to  easily  rationalize  the  abundance  of  life  throughout  the  universe.   I  think  we&#8217;ve  all  come  to  terms  on  that  front.</p>
<p>Four  billion  stars  in  our  galaxy  alone !     And  how  many  galaxies  in  the  universe&#8230;  probably  trillions  !</p>
<p>You  need  proof  of  aliens  and  ufos  ?    Well,   we  don&#8217;t  have  a  clue  as  to  how  vast  and  complicated  life-forms  could  possibly  be  in  this  universe,  so  we  may  not  recognize  evidence  even  if  it  were  right  up  under  our  nose  !      On  the  astronomical  scale,  humans  have  the  life-span  of  a  tic  or  a  fly,  and  the  universe  is  at  least  13.5  billion  years  old.   Don&#8217;t  you  think  that  there  are  things  and  life-forms  so  old  beyond  our  comprehension  that  we  may  not  be  capable  of  detecting  it  with  our  limited  senses  ???  </p>
<p>My  point  is  simple.   Earth  grounded  human-beings  need  to  get  up  off  their  arrogance  and  skepticism,  and  start  thinking  with  an  open-mindedness  rather  than  a  closed  minded  approach  to  life  and  aliens. </p>
<p>Think  of  the  size  of  an  ant  compared  to  a  human-being.  Think  of  the  size  of  earth  compared  to  the  size  of  the  sun.    There  are  layers  and  scales  beyond  our  imaginations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The ABCs of skepticism &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-169159</link>
		<dc:creator>The ABCs of skepticism &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-169159</guid>
		<description>[...] Unidentified, the definition&#8217;s specific, But it doesn&#8217;t stop cranks thinking they&#8217;re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unidentified, the definition&#8217;s specific, But it doesn&#8217;t stop cranks thinking they&#8217;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Vachon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-157696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Vachon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-157696</guid>
		<description>Granted, the vast majority of UFO sightings are frauds, geese, balloons etc.  But when a government sends plane after them to &quot;shoot them down&quot;, as several governments have, I think twice.  There are 200 billion stars in our galaxy.  The thought that at least a few have intelligence and abilities far beyond us is not so far fetched.  The fact that they don&#039;t land on the White House lawn may mean that they don&#039;t know what the White House is!  They are here to look around, not to mess with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted, the vast majority of UFO sightings are frauds, geese, balloons etc.  But when a government sends plane after them to &#8220;shoot them down&#8221;, as several governments have, I think twice.  There are 200 billion stars in our galaxy.  The thought that at least a few have intelligence and abilities far beyond us is not so far fetched.  The fact that they don&#8217;t land on the White House lawn may mean that they don&#8217;t know what the White House is!  They are here to look around, not to mess with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fizzy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-156824</link>
		<dc:creator>Fizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-156824</guid>
		<description>A Mission To Earth.

Let’s look at this simple story of an intelligent being who wishes to travel from his home planet to Earth then return safely to his home planet.  Just for the sake of easy math we’ll say that Earth is only 100 lights years away from his  planet.

Mission one:  View Earth from our home planet.
The image of Earth that the viewer sees is 100 years old given the fact of the speed of light.
So the image is Earth year 1509.

Mission two:  Send a probe to Earth and get information.
The probe is launch and will take one hundreds years to arrive Earth.  (now 1609) Once it lands it will send us  information back to our home planet.  The information will take one hundred years to arrive. Earth year is now 1709

Mission Three: Launch a manned craft to orbit the Earth.
The round trip manned mission will take us two hundred years.  Photos of Earth’s technology will assist us in learning about it’s inhabitants.  (Images would be Earth in it’s year 1809) Of course given the time difference for information, fact gathering is expected to not be up to date by the end of mission three. Earth year is now 1909

Mission Four:  Walk on the Earth.
Our  third mission taught us that the Earth beings do no have the technology of manned flight.  They also are now capable of electronic communication.  So a two hundred year mission is planned.  Send a being one hundred light years to Earth.  Land on the blue planet. Slaughter a cow. Draw designs on hay fields.  Do not celebrate joyously of the successful mission or attempt to greet the Earth people.  Do not leave a flag or any other evidence of your landing.   Arrive back to the home planet. The Earth year is now 2109

Our crew members arrived Earth on Earth’s year 2009.  The advancements of their technology took us slightly by surprise given the fact that this project has taken 500 years to achieve. 

Was the trip worth it?

Mission Five: Fake future Earth landings.
Much less expensive and we can claim to travel faster than the speed of light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Mission To Earth.</p>
<p>Let’s look at this simple story of an intelligent being who wishes to travel from his home planet to Earth then return safely to his home planet.  Just for the sake of easy math we’ll say that Earth is only 100 lights years away from his  planet.</p>
<p>Mission one:  View Earth from our home planet.<br />
The image of Earth that the viewer sees is 100 years old given the fact of the speed of light.<br />
So the image is Earth year 1509.</p>
<p>Mission two:  Send a probe to Earth and get information.<br />
The probe is launch and will take one hundreds years to arrive Earth.  (now 1609) Once it lands it will send us  information back to our home planet.  The information will take one hundred years to arrive. Earth year is now 1709</p>
<p>Mission Three: Launch a manned craft to orbit the Earth.<br />
The round trip manned mission will take us two hundred years.  Photos of Earth’s technology will assist us in learning about it’s inhabitants.  (Images would be Earth in it’s year 1809) Of course given the time difference for information, fact gathering is expected to not be up to date by the end of mission three. Earth year is now 1909</p>
<p>Mission Four:  Walk on the Earth.<br />
Our  third mission taught us that the Earth beings do no have the technology of manned flight.  They also are now capable of electronic communication.  So a two hundred year mission is planned.  Send a being one hundred light years to Earth.  Land on the blue planet. Slaughter a cow. Draw designs on hay fields.  Do not celebrate joyously of the successful mission or attempt to greet the Earth people.  Do not leave a flag or any other evidence of your landing.   Arrive back to the home planet. The Earth year is now 2109</p>
<p>Our crew members arrived Earth on Earth’s year 2009.  The advancements of their technology took us slightly by surprise given the fact that this project has taken 500 years to achieve. </p>
<p>Was the trip worth it?</p>
<p>Mission Five: Fake future Earth landings.<br />
Much less expensive and we can claim to travel faster than the speed of light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinrich Schultzz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-155960</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinrich Schultzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-155960</guid>
		<description>&quot; Those who know, don’t speak. Those who speak, don’t know.&quot;

Not always true.  

Your governments lie to you.  Why? They don&#039;t think you can handle the truth. The real truth is mixed in with the untruth. If I told you the truth which is so simple it could set you free, but those of you who don&#039;t believe in God will have a difficult time of it.  What does God have to do with it?  He arranged for us to be here for a reason.  For His reason.  What do other beings have to do with it? He made them for a reson too, only not all of them did what He asked.  That&#039;s why he arranged for us to be here. Out time is approaching its end.  Oh don&#039;t worry.  If you&#039;re reading this the end won&#039;t be in your time unless it is you&#039;re end.  There is a reason for much of the visits from these &quot;other&quot; beings. Get right with your maker before your time runs out. Don&#039;t worry about any thing else.  You might write me off as another nut but just remember the remark right after the quote at the top of this message.  Auf Wiedersehen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Those who know, don’t speak. Those who speak, don’t know.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not always true.  </p>
<p>Your governments lie to you.  Why? They don&#8217;t think you can handle the truth. The real truth is mixed in with the untruth. If I told you the truth which is so simple it could set you free, but those of you who don&#8217;t believe in God will have a difficult time of it.  What does God have to do with it?  He arranged for us to be here for a reason.  For His reason.  What do other beings have to do with it? He made them for a reson too, only not all of them did what He asked.  That&#8217;s why he arranged for us to be here. Out time is approaching its end.  Oh don&#8217;t worry.  If you&#8217;re reading this the end won&#8217;t be in your time unless it is you&#8217;re end.  There is a reason for much of the visits from these &#8220;other&#8221; beings. Get right with your maker before your time runs out. Don&#8217;t worry about any thing else.  You might write me off as another nut but just remember the remark right after the quote at the top of this message.  Auf Wiedersehen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-142128</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-142128</guid>
		<description>&lt;table border=&quot;2&quot; bgcolor=&quot;black&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;yellow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;*Crickets*&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="2" bgcolor="black">
<tr>
<td align="center"><font color="yellow"><b>*Crickets*</b></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aliens? Yes. UFOs? No. &#171; Alice&#8217;s Astro Info</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-141515</link>
		<dc:creator>Aliens? Yes. UFOs? No. &#171; Alice&#8217;s Astro Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-141515</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out what Phil has said about SETI and about UFOs: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out what Phil has said about SETI and about UFOs: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan French</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-141079</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-141079</guid>
		<description>Probably a final comment...

We&#039;ve been in off the grid, courtesy of mother-nature, for just shy of three and a half days, and I&#039;ve been enjoying rereading Sagan&#039;s &quot;The Demon-Haunted World.&quot;  Highly recommended if it has not made your reading list yet.

Some other interesting books...
&quot;How We Know What Isn&#039;t So (The Fallacy of Reason in Everyday Life),&quot; by Thomas Gilovich.
&quot;Don&#039;t Believe Everything You Think (The 6 Basic Mistakes We Make in Thinking),&quot; by Thomas Kida.
&quot;Mistakes Were Made (But Not By Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts,&quot; by Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson.

Clear, dark skies, free of wasted light, Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably a final comment&#8230;</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been in off the grid, courtesy of mother-nature, for just shy of three and a half days, and I&#8217;ve been enjoying rereading Sagan&#8217;s &#8220;The Demon-Haunted World.&#8221;  Highly recommended if it has not made your reading list yet.</p>
<p>Some other interesting books&#8230;<br />
&#8220;How We Know What Isn&#8217;t So (The Fallacy of Reason in Everyday Life),&#8221; by Thomas Gilovich.<br />
&#8220;Don&#8217;t Believe Everything You Think (The 6 Basic Mistakes We Make in Thinking),&#8221; by Thomas Kida.<br />
&#8220;Mistakes Were Made (But Not By Me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts,&#8221; by Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson.</p>
<p>Clear, dark skies, free of wasted light, Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnigget</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-140567</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnigget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-140567</guid>
		<description>@ Todd &amp; Greg:

At least Michael Horn is an obvious charlatan with clear, non-pathological motivation$.  

I think it was Alan who suggested above, so many of these others seem to latch onto this nonsense because it offers them the opportunity to be instant experts in a subject that can be dressed up to appear as genuine science, because &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; science is a subject that requires to much work to actually study and master.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Todd &#038; Greg:</p>
<p>At least Michael Horn is an obvious charlatan with clear, non-pathological motivation$.  </p>
<p>I think it was Alan who suggested above, so many of these others seem to latch onto this nonsense because it offers them the opportunity to be instant experts in a subject that can be dressed up to appear as genuine science, because <i>real</i> science is a subject that requires to much work to actually study and master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd W.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-140513</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-140513</guid>
		<description>@Greg

If on a continuum of fun we start with Michael Horn, move to this discussion and say that it is more fun, I fear a fun overload the next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Greg</p>
<p>If on a continuum of fun we start with Michael Horn, move to this discussion and say that it is more fun, I fear a fun overload the next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg in Austin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-12/#comment-140510</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg in Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-140510</guid>
		<description>@Todd,

You are probably right. However, my bet is that this issue will come up again, as it has many times before. Maybe next time it will be even more fun!

8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Todd,</p>
<p>You are probably right. However, my bet is that this issue will come up again, as it has many times before. Maybe next time it will be even more fun!</p>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd W.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-11/#comment-140480</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-140480</guid>
		<description>@Rory

Kuhigget provided his evidence at December 10th, 2008 at 7:02 pm.  Apparently you missed it.

Also, please re-read my comment at December 11th, 2008 at 12:04 pm advising you to not take everything so personally.  I won&#039;t reiterate it here, as it takes up a bit of space.

As for Alan&#039;s questions, here are a couple that I didn&#039;t notice a reply to:

&lt;blockquote&gt;If you don’t believe the evidence shows UFOs are alien spacecraft, why does the briefing document from the Disclosure Project you posted include many people who claim just that? If it didn’t reflect your viewpoint, why post it - at least without a disclaimer?

Also, do you believe Edgar Mitchell is a reliable source?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That was up at December 5th, 2008 at 7:26 am.

To everyone else, I think that this discussion died long ago.  It is going nowhere, and it is apparent that Rory is going to continue taking personal umbrage at just about any comment directed at him, seeing personal attacks and deliberate twisting of words where there is none.  I propose, then, that we let it all go and stop posting.  The conversation is stagnant.  Let it die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rory</p>
<p>Kuhigget provided his evidence at December 10th, 2008 at 7:02 pm.  Apparently you missed it.</p>
<p>Also, please re-read my comment at December 11th, 2008 at 12:04 pm advising you to not take everything so personally.  I won&#8217;t reiterate it here, as it takes up a bit of space.</p>
<p>As for Alan&#8217;s questions, here are a couple that I didn&#8217;t notice a reply to:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you don’t believe the evidence shows UFOs are alien spacecraft, why does the briefing document from the Disclosure Project you posted include many people who claim just that? If it didn’t reflect your viewpoint, why post it &#8211; at least without a disclaimer?</p>
<p>Also, do you believe Edgar Mitchell is a reliable source?</p></blockquote>
<p>That was up at December 5th, 2008 at 7:26 am.</p>
<p>To everyone else, I think that this discussion died long ago.  It is going nowhere, and it is apparent that Rory is going to continue taking personal umbrage at just about any comment directed at him, seeing personal attacks and deliberate twisting of words where there is none.  I propose, then, that we let it all go and stop posting.  The conversation is stagnant.  Let it die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IVAN3MAN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/comment-page-11/#comment-140457</link>
		<dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/25/aliens-yes-ufos-no/#comment-140457</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/12/beliefs-in-god-ufos-prevail/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;font color=&quot;blue&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Beliefs in God, UFOs Prevail&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;b&gt;1 in 3 doubt Darwin theory&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Americans believe in God, angels, heaven, miracles - such traditional religious thinking is still much a part of the nation&#039;s mind-set, according to research that also plumbs a few less traditional beliefs.

[...]

Overall, 44 percent of the respondents said they believe in ghosts, 36 percent say UFOs are real while 31 percent believe in both witches and astrology. About a quarter believe in reincarnation, or &quot;that you were once another person,&quot; the survey found.

[...]&lt;/blockquote&gt;

(Click on the link to read more.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/12/beliefs-in-god-ufos-prevail/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><font color="blue"><b>Beliefs in God, UFOs Prevail</b></font></a></p>
<p><b>1 in 3 doubt Darwin theory</b></p>
<blockquote><p>Americans believe in God, angels, heaven, miracles &#8211; such traditional religious thinking is still much a part of the nation&#8217;s mind-set, according to research that also plumbs a few less traditional beliefs.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>Overall, 44 percent of the respondents said they believe in ghosts, 36 percent say UFOs are real while 31 percent believe in both witches and astrology. About a quarter believe in reincarnation, or &#8220;that you were once another person,&#8221; the survey found.</p>
<p>[...]</p></blockquote>
<p>(Click on the link to read more.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 15:43:03 -->
