<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FOLLOWUP: Leap seconds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:42:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2008 teve um dia e um segundo a mais! Chega! &#171; Comentários, Críticas, Dicas etc.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-145492</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 teve um dia e um segundo a mais! Chega! &#171; Comentários, Críticas, Dicas etc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/#comment-145492</guid>
		<description>[...] Bad Astronmer FOLLOWUP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bad Astronmer FOLLOWUP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-144908</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/#comment-144908</guid>
		<description>Robert Gift: It&#039;s actually a bit more complicated than that,,,ever bit of meteor that falls to earth has to impact the planet with some velocity and, depending on whether it impacts from a trailing direction(ie, coming up on the planet from behind, impacting against or with the planets rotation) or from head on(with the same caveats) they will impart their mass energy to our angular velocity. On average, it all cancels out. Besides, it took over 4 billion years and the ejection of a large mass into orbit(the moon) to slow our planetary rotation from a six hour day to the current 24. I expect life will be long gone due to solar expansion before the earths rotation stops. Too far in the future for even ME to worry about,,,

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Gift: It&#8217;s actually a bit more complicated than that,,,ever bit of meteor that falls to earth has to impact the planet with some velocity and, depending on whether it impacts from a trailing direction(ie, coming up on the planet from behind, impacting against or with the planets rotation) or from head on(with the same caveats) they will impart their mass energy to our angular velocity. On average, it all cancels out. Besides, it took over 4 billion years and the ejection of a large mass into orbit(the moon) to slow our planetary rotation from a six hour day to the current 24. I expect life will be long gone due to solar expansion before the earths rotation stops. Too far in the future for even ME to worry about,,,</p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-144822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 08:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/#comment-144822</guid>
		<description>So why doesn&#039;t the international standards committee that makes up the rules just redefine the length of day in atomic clock terms? Move the 1900 standard to 2000? That&#039;s what astronomers did when shifting from the 1950 ephemeris to the 2000.

- Jack

PS - I belive &quot;second&quot; when refering to the unit of time is short for &quot;second minute,&quot; since it breaks the minute into the same number of pieces that a minute breaks an hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why doesn&#8217;t the international standards committee that makes up the rules just redefine the length of day in atomic clock terms? Move the 1900 standard to 2000? That&#8217;s what astronomers did when shifting from the 1950 ephemeris to the 2000.</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
<p>PS &#8211; I belive &#8220;second&#8221; when refering to the unit of time is short for &#8220;second minute,&#8221; since it breaks the minute into the same number of pieces that a minute breaks an hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-144744</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/#comment-144744</guid>
		<description>Phil, you said, &quot;In fact, one is added almost every year now.&quot; Why haven&#039;t we had one since 2005?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, you said, &#8220;In fact, one is added almost every year now.&#8221; Why haven&#8217;t we had one since 2005?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haxe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-144724</link>
		<dc:creator>Haxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/#comment-144724</guid>
		<description>There seems to be an error in this followup post. It says:

&lt;quote&gt;
Imagine you have two clocks. One thinks there are 86,400 seconds in a day, the other thinks that there are 86,401, so the second clock runs a tad bit slower than the first.
&lt;/quote&gt;

Actually, the second clock will only count 86401 seconds per day if it runs _faster_ than the first clock, not slower.

Haxe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be an error in this followup post. It says:</p>
<p><quote><br />
Imagine you have two clocks. One thinks there are 86,400 seconds in a day, the other thinks that there are 86,401, so the second clock runs a tad bit slower than the first.<br />
</quote></p>
<p>Actually, the second clock will only count 86401 seconds per day if it runs _faster_ than the first clock, not slower.</p>
<p>Haxe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Gift</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-144698</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Gift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/#comment-144698</guid>
		<description>MASS from METEORS and SPACE DUST
is slowing the earth. 
So if we launch more rockets to rid ourselves of some of the mass, and launch them in an easterly direction, we will speed up the earth.

Problem solved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MASS from METEORS and SPACE DUST<br />
is slowing the earth.<br />
So if we launch more rockets to rid ourselves of some of the mass, and launch them in an easterly direction, we will speed up the earth.</p>
<p>Problem solved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBY</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-144691</link>
		<dc:creator>IBY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/31/followup-leap-seconds/#comment-144691</guid>
		<description>I wonder in what year will the Earth&#039;s rotation be tidally locked with the moon&#039;s. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder in what year will the Earth&#8217;s rotation be tidally locked with the moon&#8217;s. ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
