<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AAS #2: Black hole doesn&#8217;t eat baby stars, and Milky Way more weighty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:55:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Autymn D. C.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/comment-page-1/#comment-191286</link>
		<dc:creator>Autymn D. C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/#comment-191286</guid>
		<description>I see five arms in the map.  Our &quot;partial arm&quot; looks broken by Sagittarius.  Our half thus has Norma outermost, Perseus, Cygnus-Orion innermost; the other half has Sagittarius-Carina outermost, Scutum-Crux-Centaurus.

&quot;The planets were thought to be lights in the sky, not places that one could visit.&quot;

If they were stones they would fall back tom Earth, wriht?  Which was why meteòrites in the 1800s were still denied?

&quot;How do they know the increased Solar orbital velocity isn’t just a result of the sun being at the periglacticon of an elliptical orbit?&quot;

They didn&#039;t say the span was any shorter.

I proved the black hole is as fake and wrong as the unicorn:
http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+-autumn+doubt+deathblows
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/73daba2d40dc8cfc/c44cda8b8e572d77?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see five arms in the map.  Our &#8220;partial arm&#8221; looks broken by Sagittarius.  Our half thus has Norma outermost, Perseus, Cygnus-Orion innermost; the other half has Sagittarius-Carina outermost, Scutum-Crux-Centaurus.</p>
<p>&#8220;The planets were thought to be lights in the sky, not places that one could visit.&#8221;</p>
<p>If they were stones they would fall back tom Earth, wriht?  Which was why meteòrites in the 1800s were still denied?</p>
<p>&#8220;How do they know the increased Solar orbital velocity isn’t just a result of the sun being at the periglacticon of an elliptical orbit?&#8221;</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t say the span was any shorter.</p>
<p>I proved the black hole is as fake and wrong as the unicorn:<br />
<a href="http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+-autumn+doubt+deathblows" rel="nofollow">http://google.com/groups?q=Autymn+-autumn+doubt+deathblows</a><br />
<a href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/73daba2d40dc8cfc/c44cda8b8e572d77?" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/73daba2d40dc8cfc/c44cda8b8e572d77?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WJM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/comment-page-1/#comment-146158</link>
		<dc:creator>WJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/#comment-146158</guid>
		<description>I love how we&#039;ve been living in this galaxy for billions of years, and yet we&#039;re still discovering new things about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how we&#8217;ve been living in this galaxy for billions of years, and yet we&#8217;re still discovering new things about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/comment-page-1/#comment-146099</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/#comment-146099</guid>
		<description>How do they know the increased Solar orbital velocity isn&#039;t just a result of the sun being at the periglacticon of an elliptical orbit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do they know the increased Solar orbital velocity isn&#8217;t just a result of the sun being at the periglacticon of an elliptical orbit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amphiox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/comment-page-1/#comment-145849</link>
		<dc:creator>amphiox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/#comment-145849</guid>
		<description>The solar system getting kicked out of the galaxy, or having its orbit shifted in whatever way large or small, in most likelihood wouldn&#039;t have that big an impact on the earth itself per se, except to change the view of the night sky. (We&#039;d of course be seeing two Milky Way-like bands in the sky in the run-up to the collision).

Of course, I think the latest consensus is that earth wouldn&#039;t be habitable anymore by the time this happens, not to say that humans might not still be around elsewhere by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solar system getting kicked out of the galaxy, or having its orbit shifted in whatever way large or small, in most likelihood wouldn&#8217;t have that big an impact on the earth itself per se, except to change the view of the night sky. (We&#8217;d of course be seeing two Milky Way-like bands in the sky in the run-up to the collision).</p>
<p>Of course, I think the latest consensus is that earth wouldn&#8217;t be habitable anymore by the time this happens, not to say that humans might not still be around elsewhere by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elmar_M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/comment-page-1/#comment-145847</link>
		<dc:creator>Elmar_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/#comment-145847</guid>
		<description>Brian said:
&quot;Anything from having one or more planets kicked out of the solar system, to the solar system kicked out of the galaxy, to getting completely blasted when the two supermassive black holes merge, to not much of anything really.&quot;

Those were pretty much my guesses as well. So I guess one can say: we do not know 
;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian said:<br />
&#8220;Anything from having one or more planets kicked out of the solar system, to the solar system kicked out of the galaxy, to getting completely blasted when the two supermassive black holes merge, to not much of anything really.&#8221;</p>
<p>Those were pretty much my guesses as well. So I guess one can say: we do not know<br />
 <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winter Solstice Man</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/comment-page-1/#comment-145839</link>
		<dc:creator>Winter Solstice Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/#comment-145839</guid>
		<description>That artwork of young stars in the galactic center was recycled from a news item a few years back about young stars in the center of the Andromeda Galaxy.

Not that it matters, probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That artwork of young stars in the galactic center was recycled from a news item a few years back about young stars in the center of the Andromeda Galaxy.</p>
<p>Not that it matters, probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/comment-page-1/#comment-145815</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/05/black-hole-doesnt-eat-baby-stars-and-milky-way-more-weighty/#comment-145815</guid>
		<description>How certain are we about the position of the Sun in the Milky Way? Isn&#039;t also possible that instead of the galaxy being more massive than previously thought, we just happen to be closer to the center, closer enough to justify the extra speed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How certain are we about the position of the Sun in the Milky Way? Isn&#8217;t also possible that instead of the galaxy being more massive than previously thought, we just happen to be closer to the center, closer enough to justify the extra speed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
