<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giggety giggety gigapennies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:55:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blow your mind, one cent at a time &#171; CyberLizard&#8217;s Collection</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/comment-page-2/#comment-179577</link>
		<dc:creator>Blow your mind, one cent at a time &#171; CyberLizard&#8217;s Collection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/#comment-179577</guid>
		<description>[...] tip: Phil Plait over at Bad Astronomy &#8211; random thoughts and other useless ephemera from the brain of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tip: Phil Plait over at Bad Astronomy &#8211; random thoughts and other useless ephemera from the brain of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy B.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/comment-page-2/#comment-149321</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/#comment-149321</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait to show this to my 5th graders, who freaked out when we read that the sun will die out in a few billion years.  This should help with their visualization of numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to show this to my 5th graders, who freaked out when we read that the sun will die out in a few billion years.  This should help with their visualization of numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links of the Week (2009/03) :: cimddwc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/comment-page-2/#comment-149111</link>
		<dc:creator>Links of the Week (2009/03) :: cimddwc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/#comment-149111</guid>
		<description>[...] How much are a million pennies? Or a trillion? Or&#8230;? The MegaPenny Project helps to understand these numbers (to some extent)&#8230; (via Bad Astronomy). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How much are a million pennies? Or a trillion? Or&#8230;? The MegaPenny Project helps to understand these numbers (to some extent)&#8230; (via Bad Astronomy). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lars bruchmann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/comment-page-2/#comment-148974</link>
		<dc:creator>lars bruchmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/#comment-148974</guid>
		<description>I heard a penny costs over a penny to make, we should just get rid of them.  then this entire string would be irrelevant, right?  lol.  that borg cube of pennies was terrifying though!  so if i don&#039;t have a penny, will a half penny do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard a penny costs over a penny to make, we should just get rid of them.  then this entire string would be irrelevant, right?  lol.  that borg cube of pennies was terrifying though!  so if i don&#8217;t have a penny, will a half penny do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/comment-page-2/#comment-148238</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/#comment-148238</guid>
		<description>interesting to note...one quintillion pennies stacked = a little over 1/6 of a light year long</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting to note&#8230;one quintillion pennies stacked = a little over 1/6 of a light year long</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/comment-page-2/#comment-148081</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/#comment-148081</guid>
		<description>Interesting table on the names of numbers.  I don&#039;t know how accurate it is truly but it seems to make scents (I couldn’t resist)

http://www.jimloy.com/math/billion.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting table on the names of numbers.  I don&#8217;t know how accurate it is truly but it seems to make scents (I couldn’t resist)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jimloy.com/math/billion.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.jimloy.com/math/billion.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/comment-page-2/#comment-148078</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/12/giggety-giggety-gigapennies/#comment-148078</guid>
		<description>Big numbers can be hard to comprehend.  

However, big numbers also multiply small errors.

According to the US Mint, a penny is 1.55 mm thick (the metric system for US coins, go figure).  But that makes a penny .061023 inches tall, just less than .0625, 1/16th of an inch.  So 16 pennies are .976 inches tall, not 1 inch.  40 pennies are 2.44 inches tall, not quite 2.5.  By the time you get to a cubic foot of pennies, you’re off by a quarter of an inch.  

I’m not one to pick on details – or maybe I am.  But I was impressed when I thought a penny was 1/16th of a foot wide and 1/16th of an inch tall.  I thought, how elegant!  I wondered if it was by coincidence or design.  When I checked then I realized it wasn’t quite so.

Still a great site, though I might suggest a few qualifiers in the statements such “almost a foot tall”, etc.

Just my 2 cents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big numbers can be hard to comprehend.  </p>
<p>However, big numbers also multiply small errors.</p>
<p>According to the US Mint, a penny is 1.55 mm thick (the metric system for US coins, go figure).  But that makes a penny .061023 inches tall, just less than .0625, 1/16th of an inch.  So 16 pennies are .976 inches tall, not 1 inch.  40 pennies are 2.44 inches tall, not quite 2.5.  By the time you get to a cubic foot of pennies, you’re off by a quarter of an inch.  </p>
<p>I’m not one to pick on details – or maybe I am.  But I was impressed when I thought a penny was 1/16th of a foot wide and 1/16th of an inch tall.  I thought, how elegant!  I wondered if it was by coincidence or design.  When I checked then I realized it wasn’t quite so.</p>
<p>Still a great site, though I might suggest a few qualifiers in the statements such “almost a foot tall”, etc.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
