<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vatican&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:40:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pat Cahalan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/comment-page-5/#comment-151034</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cahalan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/#comment-151034</guid>
		<description>@ Eric the Read:

Just catching up on this thread, there is something that needs to be pointed out:

Different does not imply ordering.  You can have a disordered set, with discrete subsets, wherein the subsets are defined by something other than &quot;less&quot; or &quot;more&quot;.  There are very broad classifications of &quot;severity&quot; of sin in the Catholic church, but it&#039;s not like there&#039;s a well ordered ordinal scale of one to ten, with five being five times as bad as one and half as bad as ten.

Even if &quot;different&quot; does imply &quot;ordering&quot;, it doesn&#039;t necessarily include the property of magnitude; given a set {a, b, c}, it may be that the only thing we can say about a, b, and c is that a is &quot;less&quot; than b and b is &quot;less&quot; than c... we may not be able to say anything about how large the differences are between a and b vs b and c.

From a proper canon law standpoint (at least in the Catholic church), excommunication is just a formality.  Whenever you sin, you&#039;re in effect excommunicating yourself, and you&#039;re supposed to refrain from all of the sacraments (other than reconciliation) until you&#039;ve repented and done your penance.  Judging from the population in the physical church during Saturday confessional vs Sunday mass, I&#039;d hazard a guess that fully 98% of the self-identified Catholics in the U.S. are actually not in a formal state of grace, as far as the church is officially concerned.  A formal excommunication is basically just a public writ confirming that someone has excommunicated themselves :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Eric the Read:</p>
<p>Just catching up on this thread, there is something that needs to be pointed out:</p>
<p>Different does not imply ordering.  You can have a disordered set, with discrete subsets, wherein the subsets are defined by something other than &#8220;less&#8221; or &#8220;more&#8221;.  There are very broad classifications of &#8220;severity&#8221; of sin in the Catholic church, but it&#8217;s not like there&#8217;s a well ordered ordinal scale of one to ten, with five being five times as bad as one and half as bad as ten.</p>
<p>Even if &#8220;different&#8221; does imply &#8220;ordering&#8221;, it doesn&#8217;t necessarily include the property of magnitude; given a set {a, b, c}, it may be that the only thing we can say about a, b, and c is that a is &#8220;less&#8221; than b and b is &#8220;less&#8221; than c&#8230; we may not be able to say anything about how large the differences are between a and b vs b and c.</p>
<p>From a proper canon law standpoint (at least in the Catholic church), excommunication is just a formality.  Whenever you sin, you&#8217;re in effect excommunicating yourself, and you&#8217;re supposed to refrain from all of the sacraments (other than reconciliation) until you&#8217;ve repented and done your penance.  Judging from the population in the physical church during Saturday confessional vs Sunday mass, I&#8217;d hazard a guess that fully 98% of the self-identified Catholics in the U.S. are actually not in a formal state of grace, as far as the church is officially concerned.  A formal excommunication is basically just a public writ confirming that someone has excommunicated themselves <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mapeidolia &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/comment-page-5/#comment-150372</link>
		<dc:creator>Mapeidolia &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/#comment-150372</guid>
		<description>[...] few days ago I asked why people always claim to see the Virgin Mary in random shapes, because it&#8217;s such an easy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days ago I asked why people always claim to see the Virgin Mary in random shapes, because it&#8217;s such an easy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papageno</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/comment-page-5/#comment-149704</link>
		<dc:creator>papageno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/#comment-149704</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Eric the Read&lt;/b&gt;:
&lt;i&gt;So, the list of “previously secret sins” is not a ranking of “badness”. Desecrating a Eucharist isn’t “worse” than genocide. It’s not “better”, either. Desecrating a consecrated Host is a foundational sin– it strikes at the heart of what it means to be a Catholic. So it requires more steps not because it’s so bad, only a pontifical commission can absolve it, but because you’ve basically acted against the basic nature of Catholicism.&lt;/i&gt;

So committing murder is not against the nature of Catholicism and therefore does not deserve automatic excommunication.
Which means that the consacrated wafer is more important than a human life.

How does this not imply a ranking of the sins?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Eric the Read</b>:<br />
<i>So, the list of “previously secret sins” is not a ranking of “badness”. Desecrating a Eucharist isn’t “worse” than genocide. It’s not “better”, either. Desecrating a consecrated Host is a foundational sin– it strikes at the heart of what it means to be a Catholic. So it requires more steps not because it’s so bad, only a pontifical commission can absolve it, but because you’ve basically acted against the basic nature of Catholicism.</i></p>
<p>So committing murder is not against the nature of Catholicism and therefore does not deserve automatic excommunication.<br />
Which means that the consacrated wafer is more important than a human life.</p>
<p>How does this not imply a ranking of the sins?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/comment-page-5/#comment-149631</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/#comment-149631</guid>
		<description>Well I think they start releasing &quot;secret sins&quot;, they are starting to make up stuff.
So if they don&#039;t like you doing something this week next week it will be a deadly sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think they start releasing &#8220;secret sins&#8221;, they are starting to make up stuff.<br />
So if they don&#8217;t like you doing something this week next week it will be a deadly sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric the Read</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/comment-page-5/#comment-149460</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric the Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/#comment-149460</guid>
		<description>So, the list of &quot;previously secret sins&quot; is not a ranking of &quot;badness&quot;.  Desecrating a Eucharist isn&#039;t &quot;worse&quot; than genocide.  It&#039;s not &quot;better&quot;, either.  Desecrating a consecrated Host is a foundational sin-- it strikes at the heart of what it means to be a Catholic.  So it requires more steps not because it&#039;s so bad, only a pontifical commission can absolve it, but because you&#039;ve basically acted against the basic nature of Catholicism.

I believe-- though I&#039;m not 100% sure, the details here can get awfully nice-- that it&#039;s either caused by, or related to, the automatic excommunication such acts incur.  Basically, once you&#039;ve excommunicated yourself, you&#039;ve put yourself outside the Church&#039;s authority, so it takes a few more steps to bring you back in the fold, so to speak.

Regardless, it is explicitly *not* a judgement of value re: the sins themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the list of &#8220;previously secret sins&#8221; is not a ranking of &#8220;badness&#8221;.  Desecrating a Eucharist isn&#8217;t &#8220;worse&#8221; than genocide.  It&#8217;s not &#8220;better&#8221;, either.  Desecrating a consecrated Host is a foundational sin&#8211; it strikes at the heart of what it means to be a Catholic.  So it requires more steps not because it&#8217;s so bad, only a pontifical commission can absolve it, but because you&#8217;ve basically acted against the basic nature of Catholicism.</p>
<p>I believe&#8211; though I&#8217;m not 100% sure, the details here can get awfully nice&#8211; that it&#8217;s either caused by, or related to, the automatic excommunication such acts incur.  Basically, once you&#8217;ve excommunicated yourself, you&#8217;ve put yourself outside the Church&#8217;s authority, so it takes a few more steps to bring you back in the fold, so to speak.</p>
<p>Regardless, it is explicitly *not* a judgement of value re: the sins themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/comment-page-5/#comment-149299</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/#comment-149299</guid>
		<description>Oops, wrong thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, wrong thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBlackCat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/comment-page-5/#comment-149298</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBlackCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/16/vaticant/#comment-149298</guid>
		<description>What is the difference between a disease and a disorder?  I usually see disorder in  reference to diseases that are caused by the body (although they can have an external trigger, like some autoimmune disorders).  That doesn&#039;t mean they are not major diseases with real effects on a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference between a disease and a disorder?  I usually see disorder in  reference to diseases that are caused by the body (although they can have an external trigger, like some autoimmune disorders).  That doesn&#8217;t mean they are not major diseases with real effects on a person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
