DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« A Bogus walk in the Park
V, part II »

Gawker reveals reality ignorance. Film at 11.

I sometimes read Gawker, a celebrity gossip site, because I enjoy the snark. They go too far sometimes (many times), but it’s usually entertaining.

And it’s a gossip site, which means you can awaken any particular writer there out of a cold sleep and they’d still be able to recite Lindsay Lohan’s daily measurements. So it’s no shock that they don’t know much about astrophysicists.

It’s an article about a crowd going to a book signing event by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, head of the Hayden Planetarium in NYC, author of many books, and frequent talk-show guest. I have no surprise that the Gawker writer didn’t know who he was, since Neil’s never hit a paparazzi, not been seen to do drugs after swearing he doesn’t do them, or hasn’t had massive plastic surgery.

Neil is, though, kind of a big deal. He’s hosted his own PBS series, been on Colbert a number of times, and was on Conan Leno recently too. Of course, readers of this particular blog are probably far more likely to know who Neil is, so we’re biased.

But in a sense, it’s cool that Neil has risen to the level of getting snarked by a gossip blog. It’s something all us astrobloggers can aspire to.

Tip o’ the autograph pen to Rebecca.

Share

January 27th, 2009 12:45 PM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff | 35 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

35 Responses to “Gawker reveals reality ignorance. Film at 11.”

  1. 1.   Quiet Desperation Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 12:51 pm

    I avoid celebrity gossip like ebola. Bleah.

  2. 2.   Helioprogenus Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Wasn’t Neil Tyson on the Tonight Show with Leno? I don’t remember seeing him on Conan though.

    Hopefully, his book tour eventually brings him around to this Central Pacific rock we call the aloha paradise. Maybe it’ll even be on my birthday, since it’s on the same day as his, and we could party it up.

  3. 3.   Larian LeQuella Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    Well, that site is blocked by CEBTAF, but for once I am thankful. Dr. Plait, I think we just found out about one of your most guilty vices. Eep! :P

  4. 4.   Romeo Vitelli Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    If it helps you out, we’d be more than happy to start a celebrity rumour about you. Any preference?

  5. 5.   Heidi Andereson Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    I told you that at Dragon Con!! I think that a skeptic/scientist gossip site is in order.

    We could even have pretend papparazi and stalkers. I volunteer to go to Las Vegas and stalk Penn Jillette! Only pretend, of course.

  6. 6.   Randall Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Tyson also did a cameo on an episode of Stargate Atlantis, but for some reason Bill Nye (who cameoed in the same episode) stole the spotlight. Not that I have anything against Nye, but I would have preferred to see more Tyson.

  7. 7.   RL Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    I guess this just shows that its a big world. What you think is important or famous may not be to others. I kind of thought that the article was cool. It may help get exposure to a larger audience and pull those people in.

  8. 8.   JoeSmithCA Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    I think I need to take some more Vitamin O.

  9. 9.   JerWah Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    They have posted an update:


    We’re reliably informed by an actual science geek that Tyson appears regularly on Discovery Channel and the channel Science as a talking head and that he hosts Science Now (a Nova spinoff) on PBS.

    Is Phil the actual science geek in question?

  10. 10.   gopher65 Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    Randall: If you read the blog of the writer of the episode of Stargate, it says that they wanted him to be in the whole thing (along with someone else that they couldn’t get), but that NDT is such a big shot that they couldn’t manage it. Plus, he’s not an actor, whereas Bill Nye is. Still, it was fun watching Bill Nye be a scienction, heh.

    I too wanted more Tyson in that episode though. He’s great:).

  11. 11.   Kevin Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:38 pm

    I had the honor of attending a lecture Dr. Tyson gave at Michigan State University last week. He was excellent, and his talk – fortunately – went way over time. :)

    And, like a true science geek, I got him to autograph swag for me. And I took a bunch of photos.

  12. 12.   molzim Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

    That’s hilarious. If I lived there, I would have been there in the front row!

    He is one sexy scientist! :)

  13. 13.   Glen Davidson Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    I always thought science needs to have much more to do with sex and other possibilities for scandal.

    This just confirms it.

    Glen D
    http://tinyurl.com/6mb592

  14. 14.   Dean Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    It was painful to even visit that site.

  15. 15.   Janiece Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Plus Jon Stewart appears to be a fan-boy. Which just proves that Jon has good taste.

  16. 16.   Yoeman Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    LOL! Read the comments, one of them says “He’s the Barack Obama of the Physics world.”
    That’s great.

  17. 17.   JackC Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    OK – you made me read that dreck. Now I have to go shower again. Uggh. And to think I live just upstream from those clueless.. .Oh wait – we are talking NYC here. I suppose that was redundant.

    JC

  18. 18.   Mike Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    This is /almost/ as bad as asking “Who is Carl Sagan?” back in the 80s/90s. Literati my ass.. illiterati is more like it. The article even starts with “WTF” and at one point I counted four consecutive question marks.

    The stupid, it burns!

  19. 19.   PsyberDave Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    [pedant]a paparazzo is the singular of paparazzi[/pedant]

    :-P

  20. 20.   Tom Woolf Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    Hayden Planetarium? Oh, I love her character in “Heroes”!

  21. 21.   Keith Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    Dr. Tyson is one of the coolest cats out there! This guy needs to crawl out from under his rock and take notice of Dr. Tyson’s greatness!

  22. 22.   MZ Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    If it helps you out, we’d be more than happy to start a celebrity rumour about you. Any preference?

    I heard Phil Plait is dating Kaley Cuoco.

  23. 23.   jrpowell Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    Save the Planetarium. Save the world.

  24. 24.   Dan Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Just a quick correction Phil. But wasn’t Neil on Leno not Conan recently?

  25. 25.   Phil Plait Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    Oops. It was Leno. Fixed.

  26. 26.   drksky Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    There’s a lot of morons on that site, and this line proves it:

    This sudden popular interest in both science and books, simultaneously, is disturbing and we’re determined to get to the bottom of it.

    Sigh…

  27. 27.   MadScientist Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    Phil, shame on you. That site (that article in particular) vilifies intelligence. I don’t know what dung heap the author of the article evolved from, but that article is a classic study of how modern tv and gossip mags can rot your brain. The author also seems to subscribe to the myth of “wikipedia research” which features in modern movies. I would never pay to see the “X-Files” movie, but it featured on a recent plane trip. I fell out of my seat laughing when I learned that Dr. Scully does her research via Google. I wonder if I could present a google-researched paper on atmospheric chemistry at the next American Geophysical Union conference … I don’t think I’d dare try.

  28. 28.   Gary Ansorge Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    drksky:

    I was kinda hoping that was said tongue in cheek.

    Gary 7

  29. 29.   Naked Bunny with a Whip Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 5:06 pm

    they’d still be able to recite Lindsay Lohan’s daily measurements.

    Whose?

    “This sudden popular interest in both science and books, simultaneously, is disturbing and we’re determined to get to the bottom of it.”

    That’s the sort of humor you get a Gawker. They were kidding. Some of the people in the comments, however, appear to be serious.

  30. 30.   Scientist makes the D-list, almost « Peculiar Velocity Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    [...] 27, 2009 by Ben Lillie Via The Bad Astronomer, my picture was on gawker.com! Well, kinda. It’s of the crowd at a recent reading by Neil [...]

  31. 31.   Cate Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 11:07 pm

    Just FYI, Neil deGrasse Tyson will be on The Daily Show, Wednesday the 28th!

  32. 32.   Winter Solstice Man Says:
    January 28th, 2009 at 7:48 am

    C. P. Snow’s The Two Cultures continues.

    I am praying this quote from that Paris Hilton brain of a blog is an ironic one:

    “This sudden popular interest in both science and books, simultaneously, is disturbing and we’re determined to get to the bottom of it.”

    I see that one of the commenters had NDGT as a teacher and then begged the blog readers not to think of him (the writer) as a total douchebag.

    Now you know why Bush was elected twice and why another Village Idiot may become our President again. Obama must have been a fluke.

  33. 33.   Elwood Herring Says:
    January 28th, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Shouldn’t that be paparazzum? Or possibly paparazzo as it’s Italian I think.

  34. 34.   gossip girl Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    So, let me get this straight: The fact that I didn’t know who Neil DeGrasse Tyson was before reading this post is worse than another commenter not knowing about Lindsay Lohan? I think that’s a little…biased. I’d venture to say it’s different sides of the same coin.

  35. 35.   Crux Australis Says:
    February 2nd, 2009 at 1:37 pm

    Elwood: paparazzo, you beat me to it.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse
      • Volcano in taupe
      • I’m giving a talk at Eastern Michigan University Feb. 15
      • Funhouse galaxy
      • Science Getaways: Update
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
      • Science Getaways: Update | Bad Astronomy
      • Exoplanet in a triple star system smack dab in the habitable zone | Bad Astronomy
      • Holy aurora | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times
      • Ebooks on the radio: 6 pm ET tonight


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us