<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Torchwood trailer!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Swanson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154642</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154642</guid>
		<description>&quot;bad wolf&quot; woulda been funnier. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;bad wolf&#8221; woulda been funnier. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cusp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154457</link>
		<dc:creator>Cusp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154457</guid>
		<description>Actually, it means &quot;the church of  St Catwg&quot; - bad wolf is something like &#039;n ddrwg blaidd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it means &#8220;the church of  St Catwg&#8221; &#8211; bad wolf is something like &#8216;n ddrwg blaidd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Swanson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154450</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154450</guid>
		<description>Heh on the Sulu joke. ;) The only non-straight male character I&#039;ve ever seen on American sci-fi would be Felix Gaeta on BSG and the last few episodes for him have been... not pretty. Plus the only time we got anything on his sexuality was in webisodes. One would think his boyfriend might have told him a thing or two during the recent events on the show, but apparently not, and now it seems unlikely we&#039;ll ever have it addressed on the actual TV program itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh on the Sulu joke. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  The only non-straight male character I&#8217;ve ever seen on American sci-fi would be Felix Gaeta on BSG and the last few episodes for him have been&#8230; not pretty. Plus the only time we got anything on his sexuality was in webisodes. One would think his boyfriend might have told him a thing or two during the recent events on the show, but apparently not, and now it seems unlikely we&#8217;ll ever have it addressed on the actual TV program itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopher65</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154314</link>
		<dc:creator>gopher65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154314</guid>
		<description>Various Star Trek writers wanted to do gay male characters in the show from time to time, all the way back to the first seasons of TNG, but it always got canned at the studio level. There&#039;s not much they can do when the studio says &quot;take it out, or you&#039;re fired&quot;. Course, nothing was stopping them from having a gay character on the later seasons of Voyager, or in any part of Enterprise. I always thought that Malcolm would have made a good gay guy:).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Various Star Trek writers wanted to do gay male characters in the show from time to time, all the way back to the first seasons of TNG, but it always got canned at the studio level. There&#8217;s not much they can do when the studio says &#8220;take it out, or you&#8217;re fired&#8221;. Course, nothing was stopping them from having a gay character on the later seasons of Voyager, or in any part of Enterprise. I always thought that Malcolm would have made a good gay guy:).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firemancarl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154233</link>
		<dc:creator>firemancarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154233</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris! Star Trek did have a gay character...Sulu!! He was just...closeted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris! Star Trek did have a gay character&#8230;Sulu!! He was just&#8230;closeted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamal Wills</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154157</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamal Wills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154157</guid>
		<description>Cool! I&#039;m glad it&#039;s coming back.  (I got worried when they killed nearly everyone off!)  Show I like are usually good, but don&#039;t last long.  I&#039;ve learned that good shows sometimes have a rocky start, but if they survive the chopping block, they might be worth hanging on to.

I like the multigeneration approach taken with the spinoffs, but I haven&#039;t gotten into the Sarah Jane adventures.  The stories seemed a bit young for me.  I&#039;d like to get the kids hooked on that show to prepare them for when they are old enough for Doctor Who.

I grew up with BBC shows on PBS and that&#039;s definitly something I&#039;d like to pass along.  I even had the girls singing &quot;The Lumberjack Song&quot; along with my iPod the other day.  Their mom is the &#039;cool&#039; one so I have to covertly infiltrate the &#039;geek&#039; culture.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s coming back.  (I got worried when they killed nearly everyone off!)  Show I like are usually good, but don&#8217;t last long.  I&#8217;ve learned that good shows sometimes have a rocky start, but if they survive the chopping block, they might be worth hanging on to.</p>
<p>I like the multigeneration approach taken with the spinoffs, but I haven&#8217;t gotten into the Sarah Jane adventures.  The stories seemed a bit young for me.  I&#8217;d like to get the kids hooked on that show to prepare them for when they are old enough for Doctor Who.</p>
<p>I grew up with BBC shows on PBS and that&#8217;s definitly something I&#8217;d like to pass along.  I even had the girls singing &#8220;The Lumberjack Song&#8221; along with my iPod the other day.  Their mom is the &#8216;cool&#8217; one so I have to covertly infiltrate the &#8216;geek&#8217; culture.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unspeakably Violent Jack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154097</link>
		<dc:creator>Unspeakably Violent Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154097</guid>
		<description>Well I like the idea of Torchwood - unfortunately I hated almost everything else about it. I don&#039;t think the BBC really committed to making it a show for adults, so that all the swearing &amp; violence &amp; such just seemed tacked on at the last minute.
I&#039;m all in favour of swearing &amp; violence but if you can remove it &amp; have the show still watchable (as they do with the pre-watershed edition) then it probably didn&#039;t need to be there in the first place.
But I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll watch the new series. I&#039;m so predictable sometimes :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I like the idea of Torchwood &#8211; unfortunately I hated almost everything else about it. I don&#8217;t think the BBC really committed to making it a show for adults, so that all the swearing &#038; violence &#038; such just seemed tacked on at the last minute.<br />
I&#8217;m all in favour of swearing &#038; violence but if you can remove it &#038; have the show still watchable (as they do with the pre-watershed edition) then it probably didn&#8217;t need to be there in the first place.<br />
But I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll watch the new series. I&#8217;m so predictable sometimes <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redcoat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154068</link>
		<dc:creator>Redcoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154068</guid>
		<description>Torchwood and (new)Who have both suffered from having to emperil and save the Earth (or The Whole Universe) on a weekly basis, as well as having to shoe-horn in a whole bunch of be-all-you-can-be/diversity empowerment stuff in lieu of character development at the same time (and I&#039;m not referring to sexual politics specifically here, just the heavy handed way in which characters&#039; emotions are portrayed).  Much of both series&#039; output has been over-contrived, melodramatic dross and because of that the producers are guilty of short-changing the public, no matter how popular the shows have been.  Very encouraging to see that in this series a story might be allowed to grow, branch and resolve properly over several episodes so I&#039;ll be tuning in (as we used to say), since, the above carping aside, I love this stuff.

Also, as to hanging with Naoko and Julie, I&#039;m sure that&#039;s cool.  Hanging with Barrowman?  Let me tell you, he really, really is that person (and way beyond great with kids).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torchwood and (new)Who have both suffered from having to emperil and save the Earth (or The Whole Universe) on a weekly basis, as well as having to shoe-horn in a whole bunch of be-all-you-can-be/diversity empowerment stuff in lieu of character development at the same time (and I&#8217;m not referring to sexual politics specifically here, just the heavy handed way in which characters&#8217; emotions are portrayed).  Much of both series&#8217; output has been over-contrived, melodramatic dross and because of that the producers are guilty of short-changing the public, no matter how popular the shows have been.  Very encouraging to see that in this series a story might be allowed to grow, branch and resolve properly over several episodes so I&#8217;ll be tuning in (as we used to say), since, the above carping aside, I love this stuff.</p>
<p>Also, as to hanging with Naoko and Julie, I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s cool.  Hanging with Barrowman?  Let me tell you, he really, really is that person (and way beyond great with kids).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkey's Uncle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154064</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkey's Uncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154064</guid>
		<description>Oi!!!
Completely O/T but relevant to the UK where Torchwood is made (see what I did there?)...Rumour and Mr Randi sez there will be an Amaz!ng Meeting in London in October...I am so there! Often read about these really cool things that you lot organise but never actually got to go to one being impoverished and living in a permanent &#039;recession&#039; as a wage slave.

Can you PLEASE let us inquiring and sceptical (note the transatlantic spelling) UK readers of your blog from way back and buyers of your books (death from the skies coming to me soon from Amazon) where the Meeting is likely to be?

Me, I prefer The Sarah Jane adventures, only because my son was in it!  
/proud dad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oi!!!<br />
Completely O/T but relevant to the UK where Torchwood is made (see what I did there?)&#8230;Rumour and Mr Randi sez there will be an Amaz!ng Meeting in London in October&#8230;I am so there! Often read about these really cool things that you lot organise but never actually got to go to one being impoverished and living in a permanent &#8216;recession&#8217; as a wage slave.</p>
<p>Can you PLEASE let us inquiring and sceptical (note the transatlantic spelling) UK readers of your blog from way back and buyers of your books (death from the skies coming to me soon from Amazon) where the Meeting is likely to be?</p>
<p>Me, I prefer The Sarah Jane adventures, only because my son was in it!<br />
/proud dad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: !AstralProjectile</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154057</link>
		<dc:creator>!AstralProjectile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154057</guid>
		<description>Just what I need-WOOT! (I still have not seen the last episode of THE DOCTOR- oversight to be remedied tomorrow on BBCA)

Of course Beverly falls in love with a Trill in a male host and can&#039;t adjust to the new female one. At that time the Trill were apparently hiding from everyone except Cisco...) But then again I&#039;m not even the dumbest Trek fan ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I need-WOOT! (I still have not seen the last episode of THE DOCTOR- oversight to be remedied tomorrow on BBCA)</p>
<p>Of course Beverly falls in love with a Trill in a male host and can&#8217;t adjust to the new female one. At that time the Trill were apparently hiding from everyone except Cisco&#8230;) But then again I&#8217;m not even the dumbest Trek fan <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bevans</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154042</link>
		<dc:creator>Bevans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154042</guid>
		<description>The first season of Torchwood was definitely hit and miss. A third of the episodes were great, a third were mediocre, and a third were pure crap. But, the second season was brilliant. Every episode was good, and the last episode was pretty surprising. It looked like Martha and Mickey were joining the cast (based on the last ep of Dr.W) and that&#039;ll be pretty cool.

I&#039;ve seen a few instances of gay females on BSG (like in Razor) but I don&#039;t recall seeing any gay male characters. Who are you referring to?

Apparently, Garek on DS9 was supposed to be gay (or bisexual) but I guess somebody put a stop to that. It&#039;s kind of a shame too - Star Trek has broken so much new ground historically. The original series had Russian AND Japanese officers, a woman on the bridge, and a black woman at that! It even had the first bi-racial kiss on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first season of Torchwood was definitely hit and miss. A third of the episodes were great, a third were mediocre, and a third were pure crap. But, the second season was brilliant. Every episode was good, and the last episode was pretty surprising. It looked like Martha and Mickey were joining the cast (based on the last ep of Dr.W) and that&#8217;ll be pretty cool.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a few instances of gay females on BSG (like in Razor) but I don&#8217;t recall seeing any gay male characters. Who are you referring to?</p>
<p>Apparently, Garek on DS9 was supposed to be gay (or bisexual) but I guess somebody put a stop to that. It&#8217;s kind of a shame too &#8211; Star Trek has broken so much new ground historically. The original series had Russian AND Japanese officers, a woman on the bridge, and a black woman at that! It even had the first bi-racial kiss on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerson Ross</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154041</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerson Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154041</guid>
		<description>John Barrowman is a sexy man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Barrowman is a sexy man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Swanson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154038</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154038</guid>
		<description>Oh, and let me guess, &quot;Llangatwg&quot; translates to &quot;bad wolf&quot;? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and let me guess, &#8220;Llangatwg&#8221; translates to &#8220;bad wolf&#8221;? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Swanson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154037</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154037</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re willing to put up with production values that were low even for the time, but were made up for with great acting and writting, then start with &lt;em&gt;An Unearthly Child&lt;/em&gt;, the first episode and now available on DVD. If you want something decidedly more modern, but frankly not as well-written, check out the first season of the new series. Both can be bought on Amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re willing to put up with production values that were low even for the time, but were made up for with great acting and writting, then start with <em>An Unearthly Child</em>, the first episode and now available on DVD. If you want something decidedly more modern, but frankly not as well-written, check out the first season of the new series. Both can be bought on Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cusp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154032</link>
		<dc:creator>Cusp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154032</guid>
		<description>The school was called Llangatwg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The school was called Llangatwg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154030</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 03:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154030</guid>
		<description>So... I must admit I have never watched an episode of Doctor Who before. I&#039;m thinking of remedying to this situation. How well as the old series aged? Is it worth starting with the first episodes from the 60&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; I must admit I have never watched an episode of Doctor Who before. I&#8217;m thinking of remedying to this situation. How well as the old series aged? Is it worth starting with the first episodes from the 60&#8242;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrNathaniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154023</link>
		<dc:creator>DrNathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154023</guid>
		<description>Feh. I hated the first season of Torchwood. They started out with an excellent hook (the glove) and then.. did nothing with it and threw it in the trash.  They pulled it out later and... threw it in the trash again.  I found the whole show to be a constant disappointment, both for character and for &#039;neat idea&#039; factor.

Bipedal: yes, Trek did deal with homosexuality by providing us with a believable inversion. It was tasteful, well-executed, and made the point. And was totally insufficient: yes, there should have been a gay character long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feh. I hated the first season of Torchwood. They started out with an excellent hook (the glove) and then.. did nothing with it and threw it in the trash.  They pulled it out later and&#8230; threw it in the trash again.  I found the whole show to be a constant disappointment, both for character and for &#8216;neat idea&#8217; factor.</p>
<p>Bipedal: yes, Trek did deal with homosexuality by providing us with a believable inversion. It was tasteful, well-executed, and made the point. And was totally insufficient: yes, there should have been a gay character long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bipedal Tetrapod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154021</link>
		<dc:creator>Bipedal Tetrapod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154021</guid>
		<description>There was that one episode of TNG where riker falls for an alien woman who is persecuted for being heterosexual. Does that count for something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was that one episode of TNG where riker falls for an alien woman who is persecuted for being heterosexual. Does that count for something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154015</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154015</guid>
		<description>I totally agree about Trek.  They&#039;ve danced around it a few times, but they&#039;ve never actually done it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree about Trek.  They&#8217;ve danced around it a few times, but they&#8217;ve never actually done it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Swanson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154013</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154013</guid>
		<description>Hey, usually when we see people other-than-straight on TV they &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; female. The fact that this show and &lt;em&gt;Battlestar Galactica&lt;/em&gt; have male characters who are bisexual (and actually get some instead of just saying they&#039;re not straight), is pretty darn nifty! Heck, BSG even had a lesbian relationship. Me, I&#039;m happy to see a bit of progress on this front.

All that said, &lt;em&gt;Trek&lt;/em&gt;, in all its incarnations, should&#039;ve had a gay or bi character long, long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, usually when we see people other-than-straight on TV they <em>are</em> female. The fact that this show and <em>Battlestar Galactica</em> have male characters who are bisexual (and actually get some instead of just saying they&#8217;re not straight), is pretty darn nifty! Heck, BSG even had a lesbian relationship. Me, I&#8217;m happy to see a bit of progress on this front.</p>
<p>All that said, <em>Trek</em>, in all its incarnations, should&#8217;ve had a gay or bi character long, long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firemancarl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154008</link>
		<dc:creator>firemancarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154008</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah, great wots-his-name likes men and women. Would it be too much to have a female star who likes men and women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah, great wots-his-name likes men and women. Would it be too much to have a female star who likes men and women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firemancarl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154006</link>
		<dc:creator>firemancarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154006</guid>
		<description>On a Doctor related note, Chris Eggleston is staring in the new G.I. Joe movie. he plays... the bad guy!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a Doctor related note, Chris Eggleston is staring in the new G.I. Joe movie. he plays&#8230; the bad guy!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OutOfMind</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-154005</link>
		<dc:creator>OutOfMind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-154005</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reminded of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childhood%27s_End&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Childhood&#039;s End&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reminded of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childhood%27s_End" rel="nofollow">Childhood&#8217;s End</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthwollipot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-153999</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthwollipot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-153999</guid>
		<description>*one story told over a giant five-night arc*

What, you mean the way Doctor Who *used* to be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*one story told over a giant five-night arc*</p>
<p>What, you mean the way Doctor Who *used* to be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KAitlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-153996</link>
		<dc:creator>KAitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/02/05/torchwood-trailer/#comment-153996</guid>
		<description>I love torchwood.  I find the show to be more aimed for adults.  Although I am fanatic about doctor who I can&#039;t get over the Ianto Jack relationship.  There just too cute together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love torchwood.  I find the show to be more aimed for adults.  Although I am fanatic about doctor who I can&#8217;t get over the Ianto Jack relationship.  There just too cute together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 11:30:53 -->
