DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Chang’e 1 impacts the Moon
Fryed astronomy »

Time lapsed Lulin

Via Universe Today I saw this video time lapse of comet Lulin as it blows gas off its nucleus:


This was taken by Joseph Brimacombe, Southern Galactic Telescope Hosting, on February 22, 2009. The solid part of a comet is usually pretty tiny, just a few kilometers across. Bigger than a mountain, but a lot smaller than a moon. But a lot of that solid part is frozen stuff that turns into gas when the comet nears the Sun. It expands, forming a cloud around the solid nucleus. That cloud can be huge– 100,000 kilometers across or more, bigger than planets!

The gas escapes away from the comet, forming a tail. That tail can get kinks, twists, sheets, ribbons, all kinds of shapes as it moves off. In the video, you really get a sense of the majesty and beauty of this process. As the tail fans out, sometimes it looks like we see part of it on both sides of the comet, but that’s just a perspective effect. Imagine someone with long hair in the wind; their hair forms a comet-like shape behind them. Looking straight at them, face-on, you’d see hair on both sides of their head. That’s more or less what we see with Lulin. You can see the so-called anti-tail in lots of the images posted of Lulin. Try a Google image search and be amazed. This is some gorgeous comet.

Share

March 2nd, 2009 8:37 AM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff | 18 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

18 Responses to “Time lapsed Lulin”

  1. 1.   Naked Bunny with a Whip Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 9:26 am

    as it blows gas off its nucleus

    /me cringes, waiting for Internet Rule 34 to kick in

  2. 2.   Dr.Arvind Mishra Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 9:35 am

    I am dissapointed as it is not visible through unaided eye in this part of globe ,i.e.Varanasi,India.

  3. 3.   QUASAR Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 10:04 am

    100,000 km?

    Are you sure about that?

  4. 4.   IVAN3MAN Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 10:27 am


    C/2007 N3 (Comet Lulin)
    Current position of Comet Lulin (C/2007 N3)
    (Click on image for the JPL/NASA interactive tool).

  5. 5.   Greg in Austin Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 10:45 am

    @QUASAR,

    I remember observing comet Holmes in 2007 with binoculars and my little 4.5″ scope. It went from magnitude 17 to about 2.8 in less than 48 hours, making it easily visible to the naked eye.

    From Wiki (for what its worth):

    The comet did not only become brighter, it also swelled in size, as its coma expanded. In late October 2007 the coma’s apparent diameter increased from 3.3 arcminutes to over 13 arcminutes[9], about half the diameter that the Moon subtends in the sky. At a distance of around 2 AU, this means that the true diameter of the coma had swelled to over 1 million km[10], or about 70% of the diameter of the Sun.

    So I guess you’re right, 100,000km is not very big for comets, especially ones that can be seen with the naked eye.

    8)

  6. 6.   QUASAR Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 11:12 am

    @ Greg in Austin

    You were viewing it with a ground based telescope and you know how distorting the atmosphere can be! And on that scale, if the comet was just 10 cm across, the the coma would be more than 1 to 10 km in diameter!

    How big was Hale Bopp’s coma?

  7. 7.   Greg in Austin Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 11:41 am

    QUASAR said,

    “You were viewing it with a ground based telescope and you know how distorting the atmosphere can be! And on that scale, if the comet was just 10 cm across, the the coma would be more than 1 to 10 km in diameter!”

    What? Atmospheric distortion has no effect on the actual size of the comet. At that time, the comet was located out between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter (1.635 AU, or 244,592,730 km from Earth) yet it was visible as a fuzzy object larger in appearance than Jupiter itself. In order for comet Holmes (with an estimated nucleus size of 3.4km) to be seen from earth over 244 million km away, its coma had to be enormous.

    “How big was Hale Bopp’s coma?”

    I don’t know. Why don’t you do some research on your own and tell us?

    8)

  8. 8.   QUASAR Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    @ Greg in Austin

    Well, I think you do realize what you’re talking about here, don’t you?
    A comet with a nucleus less than 10 km in diameter and it has a coma that’s way bigger than the Earth’s diameter!

  9. 9.   QUASAR Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    And I really don’t think that the coma is really that big! Maybe it’s just the intense brightness that makes it seem so large!

  10. 10.   Joe Meils Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    Are you sure that’s not just a road flare, shot in slow motion?

    Seriously, very cool that they could accomplish that.

  11. 11.   ncc1701 Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    @ Greg in Austin:
    Perhaps comet Holmes took some pills to increase the size of its coma.

  12. 12.   QUASAR Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    @ Joe Meils & ncc1701

    Those two are hilarious!

  13. 13.   Mark Hansen Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 3:39 pm

    For the benefit of QUASAR, who would rather make unsupported statements than do some 5 minute research;

    The maximum extent of the coma observed around Hale-Bopp when it was near the Earth and the Sun in early 1997, was 2-3 million km, or only a few times more than now; the uncertainty arises from the different observational methods used. Comae of other comets rarely ever become larger than a few hundred thousand kilometres. There is little doubt that the exceptional dimensions of the coma around Hale-Bopp is a direct consequence of its unusually large nucleus. Although it never became possible to measure its size accurately, a variety of observational methods points towards a diameter in the 40 – 70 km range. The nuclei of most other comets are at most a few km across. With its larger surface, more material is released — this provides a natural explanation of the unusual coma of Hale-Bopp.

    All above information from http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/comet/eso28.html

  14. 14.   Crux Australis Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    Yeah, how ’bout that Holmes? Bigger than the Sun?!

  15. 15.   Greg in Austin Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    QUASAR said,

    “And I really don’t think that the coma is really that big! Maybe it’s just the intense brightness that makes it seem so large!”

    The great thing about science, is you don’t have to believe anyone else. You can test it for yourself.

    If you have binoculars or a small backyard telescope, with a known magnification and field of view, you can observe the comet’s apparent size. Then, if you look up the position of the comet in its orbit (from data collected by people who have been observing it for months or years), you could determine its distance from Earth, and then calculate its actual size.

    Again, since you don’t want to believe anyone here, you could spend 5 minutes googling “astonomy comets” and find hundreds of articles that support Phil’s claim. One good little source of information: astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=2295. Or, you can do a little bit of research and experimentation yourself. Go out tonight and look at the sky, and then come back with your findings.

    8)

  16. 16.   Greg in Austin Says:
    March 2nd, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    QUASAR said,

    “A comet with a nucleus less than 10 km in diameter and it has a coma that’s way bigger than the Earth’s diameter!”

    What’s the big deal? The Earth is not at all very big, compared to Jupiter, Saturn, or the Sun. And space is huge. Why is it so hard to fathom a giant chunk of rock and ice heating up and spewing out gas for thousands or millions of kilometers?

    If the size of these comets is unbelievable to you, then don’t go looking at stellar nebula or supernovae!

    8)

  17. 17.   Greg in Austin Says:
    March 3rd, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    So, QUASAR, how’s that research going?

    8)

  18. 18.   Mark Hansen Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    @Greg,
    S/he’s way too busy looking for other threads to troll to do research.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Obi Wan better watch his back
      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station
      • Mars craters are sublime
      • OK, one more eclipse shot
      • Cateidolia
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff



       Twitter



      Follow Me on Pinterest



       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station | Bad Astronomy
      • Mars craters are sublime | Bad Astronomy
      • OK, one more eclipse shot | Bad Astronomy
      • Saturn, surreally | Bad Astronomy
      • SpaceX Dragon on its way to the ISS! | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
      • A Flu Shot For Life
      • The Vital Chain: Why Manta Rays Need Forests
      • Tapeworms in the brain: Fearfully common
      • Lost voyages to the North Pole and more: Catching up with Download the Universe


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us