DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Binary black holes terrorize quasar nucleus
Space, now in 3D »

EXTIRPATE!

Linking to The Sun makes me feel a little skeevy, but this is too funny not to mention: workers cleaning out a pond in England found a surprise: a Dalek! Evidently it was left over from a Doctor Who shoot some time in the past.

All I ever find in the puddles in my back yard is stuff my dogs left. If there’s a lesson in here I’m not sure what it is.

Share

March 4th, 2009 1:09 PM by Phil Plait in SciFi, TV/Movies | 27 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

27 Responses to “EXTIRPATE!”

  1. 1.   Cory Meyer Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    Makes you wonder if there’s a TARDIS submersed in the English Channel.

  2. 2.   Todd W. Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    It’s not actually a prop. The Daleks really did invade, but the British government is covering it up.

  3. 3.   Digitalastro Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 1:23 pm

    Here’s my favorite line from the article…

    “We’ve all agreed it best to keep the pond’s exact location under wraps. The last thing we want is sci-fi fans descending on the pond frantically searching for other Dalek parts.”

    Well, I guess I can cancel my flight now.

  4. 4.   Charles Boyer Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    ^ Yup, hordes of those crazed scifi fans would be skin diving in the warm English waters to find Dalek pieces.

  5. 5.   Larian LeQuella Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 2:03 pm

    Todd W. may be on to something. Do the metals match those from Roswell?

  6. 6.   Andy Beaton Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    Is anyone else afraid that top scientists will study it and accidentally wake it from cryo-sleep?

  7. 7.   Todd W. Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    @Andy Beaton

    Meh…the Doctor will save us.

  8. 8.   Davidlpf Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    @ Todd W
    And the Ferengi took over the banking and insurance industry in states and messed things up.

  9. 9.   PG Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    @Davidlpf: Apparently, “Exterminate!” is not a valid Rule of Acquisition.

  10. 10.   jwink Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    Not to go on too much of a tangent, but I actually had to look up ‘skeevy’: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy.

    I gave you the benefit of the doubt and went with the first definition. Linking to the sun makes you feel disgusting or distasteful?

  11. 11.   Davidlpf Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    @PG, according to some we would better off if it was a valid Rule of Acquisition.

  12. 12.   QUASAR Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    Hmmm, how interesting.

  13. 13.   NateEaton Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

    Let me guess… bet you raise sundogs, huh?

  14. 14.   Romeo Vitelli Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    This is kind of disturbing. The BBC doesn’t have a policy for the safe disposal of Daleks? Who knows what kind of health hazard is involved here? I hope the environmental groups jump on them for this.

  15. 15.   Mena Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    I’m just wondering where the rest of it is… :^@

  16. 16.   Davidlpf Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    Doctor Who Fan:”These are not the Dalek bodies you looking for”
    Park Keeper “These are not the Dalek bodies I am looking for.”
    (lets see how many sci fi streams I can cross.)

  17. 17.   Paul Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    Kudos for best use of the word “Extirpate” I’ve read in 10 years.

  18. 18.   Chris Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    “I’m not a Dalek.”

    “But she looks like one.”

    “They dressed me up like this.”

    “Throw her into the pond!!”

  19. 19.   Peter N. Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 9:40 pm

    Doesn’t that Dalek look awfully nice for supposedly having been in the drink for 30 years? I suspect we’re being had.

    That said, if this is really as represented, imagine that Doctor Who had been canceled shortly after the Dalek had been dumped in the pond, and long forgotten by now. Then, in 2009, SOMETHING big and gray and metallic with strange protuberances, that looked like it could hold a person, and had some basic wiring for flashing lights and so forth, turned up in a pond. What would we imagine it was?

  20. 20.   Long Lost Dalek Found « The Crystal Conundrum Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    [...] Long Lost Dalek Found Published 5 March, 2009 Humour Workers in England uncovered a Dalek in a pond!  Click here for the story in The Sun.  No, I’m not a reader of The Sun.  I found out about the story on another blog. [...]

  21. 21.   Kristin C Says:
    March 5th, 2009 at 3:09 am

    Ha! Guess I was a bit too late with the Twitter-notifying. Blame my snot-filled sinuses.

  22. 22.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    March 5th, 2009 at 3:38 am

    Romeo Vitelli said:

    This is kind of disturbing. The BBC doesn’t have a policy for the safe disposal of Daleks? Who knows what kind of health hazard is involved here? I hope the environmental groups jump on them for this.

    Hey, it was the seventies. No-one had policies for the safe disposal of anything!

  23. 23.   MadScientist Says:
    March 5th, 2009 at 4:49 am

    That’s no prop! I remember fighting that Dalek in a previous life. I thought no one would ever find it in the bog, but now that it’s been found it won’t be long before people replicate it and machines take over the world. Hmm. Come to think of it, why did I try to prevent that from happening?

  24. 24.   Abslom Daak Says:
    March 5th, 2009 at 6:05 am

    If it’s a recent forgery, they’ve done their homework. By the looks of it, it’s certainly pre-Time War.

    Given the eyestalk finning, the dome-ish lights at the side, and the eyepiece itself reveal it to be what you’d refer to as a Pertwee-era Dalek – see this library for verification:
    http://www.projectdalek.co.uk/files/reflib/07_Day_Of/index.html

    For those interested in Dalek-hunting for fun and profit, this type is fairly early. No temporal shift capabilities, poor armour, small calibre weaponry and a fairly poor range of travel. As always though, they ARE capable of flight, so be wary.

    Any reasonable energy weapon will have one of these in trouble, and even some particle weapons stand a good chance. This is well before they incorporated force-fields, so the eyestalk is a good aiming point. Failing that, I seem to recall that their rear armour is thinner, and that their bottom armour is even worse. Ever seen a Dalek run over a land mine? If yours flies further than my record of 127m, then I owe you a beer.

    I’ve also found that these early models are very vulnerable to having their vision obscured – their self-repair capability is very limited, and self cleaning is pretty basic. I wouldn’t count on thrown mud doing the trick, but a decent heavy sack would probably have it screaming “I AM IMMOBILISED” in a way that’ll make you wonder how Daleks ever survived these earlier years…

    Happy hunting!

  25. 25.   Elwood Herring Says:
    March 5th, 2009 at 6:24 am

    DON’T TOUCH THAT SWITCH!

  26. 26.   Winter Solstice Man Says:
    March 5th, 2009 at 7:01 am

    This seems in line with the other real tragedy the BBC did in the 1970s – erase hundreds (thousands?) of tapes with old programs on them for reuse, permanently destroying the records of many series including many episodes of Doctor Who.

    Clearly someone (a committee I am sure) at the BBC had no sense of history.

    Hopefully some day that Doctor will travel back to 70s England and stop the fools responsible for this loss to our history. Then he can head on over to Alexandria, Egypt circa 400 AD and stop the barbarians from destroying the Library there.

  27. 27.   Joe Meils Says:
    March 5th, 2009 at 10:27 am

    This sounds like the start of a good episode…

    “We found this thing in a bog, but we don’t know what it is… there seems to be something inside it, but as yet we haven’t been able to open it..”

    “I think we need to call in Torchwood, maybe they have some idea of what it is.”

    “Nah… let’s just try cutting it open first… what could go wrong?”

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us