<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EXTIRPATE!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:35:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Meils</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160269</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Meils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160269</guid>
		<description>This sounds like the start of a good episode... 

&quot;We found this thing in a bog, but we don&#039;t know what it is... there seems to be something inside it, but as yet we haven&#039;t been able to open it..&quot;

&quot;I think we need to call in Torchwood, maybe they have some idea of what it is.&quot;

&quot;Nah... let&#039;s just try cutting it open first... what could go wrong?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like the start of a good episode&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;We found this thing in a bog, but we don&#8217;t know what it is&#8230; there seems to be something inside it, but as yet we haven&#8217;t been able to open it..&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I think we need to call in Torchwood, maybe they have some idea of what it is.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Nah&#8230; let&#8217;s just try cutting it open first&#8230; what could go wrong?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winter Solstice Man</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160221</link>
		<dc:creator>Winter Solstice Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160221</guid>
		<description>This seems in line with the other real tragedy the BBC did in the 1970s - erase hundreds (thousands?) of tapes with old programs on them for reuse, permanently destroying the records of many series including many episodes of Doctor Who.

Clearly someone (a committee I am sure) at the BBC had no sense of history.

Hopefully some day that Doctor will travel back to 70s England and stop the fools responsible for this loss to our history.  Then he can head on over to Alexandria, Egypt circa 400 AD and stop the barbarians from destroying the Library there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems in line with the other real tragedy the BBC did in the 1970s &#8211; erase hundreds (thousands?) of tapes with old programs on them for reuse, permanently destroying the records of many series including many episodes of Doctor Who.</p>
<p>Clearly someone (a committee I am sure) at the BBC had no sense of history.</p>
<p>Hopefully some day that Doctor will travel back to 70s England and stop the fools responsible for this loss to our history.  Then he can head on over to Alexandria, Egypt circa 400 AD and stop the barbarians from destroying the Library there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elwood Herring</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160215</link>
		<dc:creator>Elwood Herring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160215</guid>
		<description>DON&#039;T TOUCH THAT SWITCH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DON&#8217;T TOUCH THAT SWITCH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abslom Daak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160213</link>
		<dc:creator>Abslom Daak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160213</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s a recent forgery, they&#039;ve done their homework.  By the looks of it, it&#039;s certainly pre-Time War.

Given the eyestalk finning, the dome-ish lights at the side, and the eyepiece itself reveal it to be what you&#039;d refer to as a Pertwee-era Dalek - see this library for verification:
http://www.projectdalek.co.uk/files/reflib/07_Day_Of/index.html

For those interested in Dalek-hunting for fun and profit, this type is fairly early.  No temporal shift capabilities, poor armour, small calibre weaponry and a fairly poor range of travel.  As always though, they ARE capable of flight, so be wary.

Any reasonable energy weapon will have one of these in trouble, and even some particle weapons stand a good chance.  This is well before they incorporated force-fields, so the eyestalk is a good aiming point.  Failing that, I seem to recall that their rear armour is thinner, and that their bottom armour is even worse.  Ever seen a Dalek run over a land mine?  If yours flies further than my record of 127m, then I owe you a beer.

I&#039;ve also found that these early models are very vulnerable to having their vision obscured - their self-repair capability is very limited, and self cleaning is pretty basic.  I wouldn&#039;t count on thrown mud doing the trick, but a decent heavy sack would probably have it screaming &quot;I AM IMMOBILISED&quot; in a way that&#039;ll make you wonder how Daleks ever survived these earlier years...

Happy hunting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s a recent forgery, they&#8217;ve done their homework.  By the looks of it, it&#8217;s certainly pre-Time War.</p>
<p>Given the eyestalk finning, the dome-ish lights at the side, and the eyepiece itself reveal it to be what you&#8217;d refer to as a Pertwee-era Dalek &#8211; see this library for verification:<br />
<a href="http://www.projectdalek.co.uk/files/reflib/07_Day_Of/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.projectdalek.co.uk/files/reflib/07_Day_Of/index.html</a></p>
<p>For those interested in Dalek-hunting for fun and profit, this type is fairly early.  No temporal shift capabilities, poor armour, small calibre weaponry and a fairly poor range of travel.  As always though, they ARE capable of flight, so be wary.</p>
<p>Any reasonable energy weapon will have one of these in trouble, and even some particle weapons stand a good chance.  This is well before they incorporated force-fields, so the eyestalk is a good aiming point.  Failing that, I seem to recall that their rear armour is thinner, and that their bottom armour is even worse.  Ever seen a Dalek run over a land mine?  If yours flies further than my record of 127m, then I owe you a beer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also found that these early models are very vulnerable to having their vision obscured &#8211; their self-repair capability is very limited, and self cleaning is pretty basic.  I wouldn&#8217;t count on thrown mud doing the trick, but a decent heavy sack would probably have it screaming &#8220;I AM IMMOBILISED&#8221; in a way that&#8217;ll make you wonder how Daleks ever survived these earlier years&#8230;</p>
<p>Happy hunting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadScientist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160200</link>
		<dc:creator>MadScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160200</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s no prop!  I remember fighting that Dalek in a previous life.  I thought no one would ever find it in the bog, but now that it&#039;s been found it won&#039;t be long before people replicate it and machines take over the world.  Hmm.  Come to think of it, why did I try to prevent that from happening?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s no prop!  I remember fighting that Dalek in a previous life.  I thought no one would ever find it in the bog, but now that it&#8217;s been found it won&#8217;t be long before people replicate it and machines take over the world.  Hmm.  Come to think of it, why did I try to prevent that from happening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160197</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160197</guid>
		<description>Romeo Vitelli said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;This is kind of disturbing. The BBC doesn’t have a policy for the safe disposal of Daleks? Who knows what kind of health hazard is involved here? I hope the environmental groups jump on them for this.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey, it was the seventies.  No-one had policies for the safe disposal of &lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romeo Vitelli said:</p>
<blockquote><p>This is kind of disturbing. The BBC doesn’t have a policy for the safe disposal of Daleks? Who knows what kind of health hazard is involved here? I hope the environmental groups jump on them for this.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, it was the seventies.  No-one had policies for the safe disposal of <i>anything</i>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin C</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160194</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160194</guid>
		<description>Ha! Guess I was a bit too late with the Twitter-notifying. Blame my snot-filled sinuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Guess I was a bit too late with the Twitter-notifying. Blame my snot-filled sinuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Lost Dalek Found &#171; The Crystal Conundrum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160173</link>
		<dc:creator>Long Lost Dalek Found &#171; The Crystal Conundrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160173</guid>
		<description>[...] Long Lost Dalek&#160;Found   Published 5 March, 2009   Humour       Workers in England uncovered a Dalek in a pond!  Click here for the story in The Sun.  No, I&#8217;m not a reader of The Sun.  I found out about the story on another blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Long Lost Dalek&nbsp;Found   Published 5 March, 2009   Humour       Workers in England uncovered a Dalek in a pond!  Click here for the story in The Sun.  No, I&#8217;m not a reader of The Sun.  I found out about the story on another blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter N.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160170</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160170</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t that Dalek look awfully nice for supposedly having been in the drink for 30 years?  I suspect we&#039;re being had.

That said, if this is really as represented, imagine that Doctor Who had been canceled shortly after the Dalek had been dumped in the pond, and long forgotten by now.  Then, in 2009, SOMETHING big and gray and metallic with strange protuberances, that looked like it could hold a person, and had some basic wiring for flashing lights and so forth, turned up in a pond.  What would we imagine it was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t that Dalek look awfully nice for supposedly having been in the drink for 30 years?  I suspect we&#8217;re being had.</p>
<p>That said, if this is really as represented, imagine that Doctor Who had been canceled shortly after the Dalek had been dumped in the pond, and long forgotten by now.  Then, in 2009, SOMETHING big and gray and metallic with strange protuberances, that looked like it could hold a person, and had some basic wiring for flashing lights and so forth, turned up in a pond.  What would we imagine it was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160163</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160163</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m not a Dalek.&quot;

&quot;But she looks like one.&quot;

&quot;They dressed me up like this.&quot;

&quot;Throw her into the pond!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not a Dalek.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;But she looks like one.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;They dressed me up like this.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Throw her into the pond!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160144</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160144</guid>
		<description>Kudos for best use of the word &quot;Extirpate&quot; I&#039;ve read in 10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos for best use of the word &#8220;Extirpate&#8221; I&#8217;ve read in 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidlpf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160134</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidlpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160134</guid>
		<description>Doctor Who Fan:&quot;These are not the Dalek bodies you looking for&quot;
Park Keeper &quot;These are not the Dalek bodies I am looking for.&quot;
(lets see how many sci fi streams I can cross.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doctor Who Fan:&#8221;These are not the Dalek bodies you looking for&#8221;<br />
Park Keeper &#8220;These are not the Dalek bodies I am looking for.&#8221;<br />
(lets see how many sci fi streams I can cross.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mena</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160132</link>
		<dc:creator>Mena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160132</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just wondering where the rest of it is...  :^@</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just wondering where the rest of it is&#8230;  :^@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo Vitelli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160124</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo Vitelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160124</guid>
		<description>This is kind of disturbing.  The BBC doesn&#039;t have a policy for the safe disposal of Daleks?  Who knows what kind of health hazard is involved here?  I hope the environmental groups jump on them for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is kind of disturbing.  The BBC doesn&#8217;t have a policy for the safe disposal of Daleks?  Who knows what kind of health hazard is involved here?  I hope the environmental groups jump on them for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NateEaton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160123</link>
		<dc:creator>NateEaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160123</guid>
		<description>Let me guess... bet you raise sundogs, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me guess&#8230; bet you raise sundogs, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QUASAR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160119</link>
		<dc:creator>QUASAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160119</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, how interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, how interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidlpf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160118</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidlpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160118</guid>
		<description>@PG, according to some we would better off if it was a valid Rule of Acquisition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@PG, according to some we would better off if it was a valid Rule of Acquisition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwink</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160117</link>
		<dc:creator>jwink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160117</guid>
		<description>Not to go on too much of a tangent, but I actually had to look up &#039;skeevy&#039;: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy.

I gave you the benefit of the doubt and went with the first definition. Linking to the sun makes you feel disgusting or distasteful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to go on too much of a tangent, but I actually had to look up &#8216;skeevy&#8217;: <a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy" rel="nofollow">http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/skeevy</a>.</p>
<p>I gave you the benefit of the doubt and went with the first definition. Linking to the sun makes you feel disgusting or distasteful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160116</link>
		<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160116</guid>
		<description>@Davidlpf: Apparently, &quot;Exterminate!&quot; is not a valid Rule of Acquisition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Davidlpf: Apparently, &#8220;Exterminate!&#8221; is not a valid Rule of Acquisition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidlpf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160111</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidlpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160111</guid>
		<description>@ Todd W
And the Ferengi took over the banking and insurance industry in states and messed things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Todd W<br />
And the Ferengi took over the banking and insurance industry in states and messed things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd W.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160110</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160110</guid>
		<description>@Andy Beaton

Meh...the Doctor will save us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy Beaton</p>
<p>Meh&#8230;the Doctor will save us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beaton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160109</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160109</guid>
		<description>Is anyone else afraid that top scientists will study it and accidentally wake it from cryo-sleep?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone else afraid that top scientists will study it and accidentally wake it from cryo-sleep?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larian LeQuella</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160102</link>
		<dc:creator>Larian LeQuella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160102</guid>
		<description>Todd W. may be on to something.  Do the metals match those from Roswell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd W. may be on to something.  Do the metals match those from Roswell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Boyer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160098</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Boyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160098</guid>
		<description>^ Yup, hordes of those crazed scifi fans would be skin diving in the warm English waters to find Dalek pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Yup, hordes of those crazed scifi fans would be skin diving in the warm English waters to find Dalek pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digitalastro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/comment-page-1/#comment-160094</link>
		<dc:creator>Digitalastro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/04/extirpate/#comment-160094</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my favorite line from the article...

“We’ve all agreed it best to keep the pond’s exact location under wraps.  The last thing we want is sci-fi fans descending on the pond frantically searching for other Dalek parts.” 


Well, I guess I can cancel my flight now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my favorite line from the article&#8230;</p>
<p>“We’ve all agreed it best to keep the pond’s exact location under wraps.  The last thing we want is sci-fi fans descending on the pond frantically searching for other Dalek parts.” </p>
<p>Well, I guess I can cancel my flight now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 09:23:28 -->
