<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deimos!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:58:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Astronomy Talks about Deimos &#124; Jimmy Newland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-280803</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Astronomy Talks about Deimos &#124; Jimmy Newland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-280803</guid>
		<description>[...] Bad Astronomy blog has a post up about the HiRISE imaging of Deimos with a cool new image of the smaller Martian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bad Astronomy blog has a post up about the HiRISE imaging of Deimos with a cool new image of the smaller Martian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bhrobards</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-163291</link>
		<dc:creator>bhrobards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-163291</guid>
		<description>How could any regolith be left with a 20km/sec escape velocity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could any regolith be left with a 20km/sec escape velocity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjörn Larsson, OM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-162110</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjörn Larsson, OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-162110</guid>
		<description>@ kuhnigget:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Which is a polite way of saying, Smack into something at a few kilometers a second and see how big a hole you make.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh! Polite, but not so funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ kuhnigget:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Which is a polite way of saying, Smack into something at a few kilometers a second and see how big a hole you make.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh! Polite, but not so funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Astronomy Talks about Deimos &#171; Bellaire Astronomy Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161869</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Astronomy Talks about Deimos &#171; Bellaire Astronomy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161869</guid>
		<description>[...] Astronomy Talks about&#160;Deimos  The Bad Astronomy blog has a post up about the HiRISE imaging of Deimos with a cool new image of the smaller Martian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Astronomy Talks about&nbsp;Deimos  The Bad Astronomy blog has a post up about the HiRISE imaging of Deimos with a cool new image of the smaller Martian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beagledad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161833</link>
		<dc:creator>Beagledad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161833</guid>
		<description>Phobos and Deimos are so small, do they really deserve to be called &quot;moons&quot;?  Is there any chance that Neil deGrasse Tyson will downgrade them to &quot;dwarf moons&quot; or some such?  Mini-moons, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phobos and Deimos are so small, do they really deserve to be called &#8220;moons&#8221;?  Is there any chance that Neil deGrasse Tyson will downgrade them to &#8220;dwarf moons&#8221; or some such?  Mini-moons, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161731</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161731</guid>
		<description>AH, so much construction material, just sitting there not being used,,,

As a very rough estimate, one could probably hollow it out and build a habitat housing several hundred thousand people and other critters.

Ah, the dreams,,,

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AH, so much construction material, just sitting there not being used,,,</p>
<p>As a very rough estimate, one could probably hollow it out and build a habitat housing several hundred thousand people and other critters.</p>
<p>Ah, the dreams,,,</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vorn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161725</link>
		<dc:creator>Vorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161725</guid>
		<description>Joe: the happy face crater, officially named &quot;Galle&quot;, was found by the Viking 1 Orbiter, sometime between 19 june 1976 and 17 august 1980, the time when the orbiter was active.  It is 230km across, so the movie got the scale more right than the comic did, as far as the debris field from the crystal fortress goes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galle_(Martian_crater)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe: the happy face crater, officially named &#8220;Galle&#8221;, was found by the Viking 1 Orbiter, sometime between 19 june 1976 and 17 august 1980, the time when the orbiter was active.  It is 230km across, so the movie got the scale more right than the comic did, as far as the debris field from the crystal fortress goes.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galle_(Martian_crater)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galle_(Martian_crater)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161721</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161721</guid>
		<description>&lt;Sealab 2021&gt;I declare martian law! Sir Phobos! Sir Deimos!&lt;/Sealab 2021&gt;

Yes...this is dated, but I loved that show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><sealab 2021>I declare martian law! Sir Phobos! Sir Deimos!</sealab></p>
<p>Yes&#8230;this is dated, but I loved that show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161719</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161719</guid>
		<description>C.A. Mel:

Ceres is about 950 km  in diameter and is a sphere.

I think that&#039;s about the lower limit for an object to gravitationally collapse into a sphere. 

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C.A. Mel:</p>
<p>Ceres is about 950 km  in diameter and is a sphere.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s about the lower limit for an object to gravitationally collapse into a sphere. </p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valdis Kletnieks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161717</link>
		<dc:creator>Valdis Kletnieks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161717</guid>
		<description>C.A. Mel: To collapse to spherical under gravity, it&#039;s gotta be several hundred miles in diameter (exact number depends on the density of the material composing the object, and the structural strength).  Ceres just barely makes it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C.A. Mel: To collapse to spherical under gravity, it&#8217;s gotta be several hundred miles in diameter (exact number depends on the density of the material composing the object, and the structural strength).  Ceres just barely makes it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Meils</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161701</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Meils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161701</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad I&#039;m not the only one who seems to have his interest piqued by the little moon&#039;s smoothness. I always assumed that both of the Martian moons would appear very much like some of the asteroids we&#039;ve encountered: darker and pockmarked to the point of looking like they were fugatives from a BBQ grill. 

I assume the reddish color is due to the surface picking up dust that has been thrown up into it&#039;s orbit from the planet below... but the lack of major cratering just facinates me. 

BTW, I caught the Watchmen flub too... my question about the film is: when did we first know about the &quot;smiley face&quot; crater on Mars? Was this something in the graphic novel, or was it something the filmmakers exploited when those photos were in the popular press a few months back, while they were still in production?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not the only one who seems to have his interest piqued by the little moon&#8217;s smoothness. I always assumed that both of the Martian moons would appear very much like some of the asteroids we&#8217;ve encountered: darker and pockmarked to the point of looking like they were fugatives from a BBQ grill. </p>
<p>I assume the reddish color is due to the surface picking up dust that has been thrown up into it&#8217;s orbit from the planet below&#8230; but the lack of major cratering just facinates me. </p>
<p>BTW, I caught the Watchmen flub too&#8230; my question about the film is: when did we first know about the &#8220;smiley face&#8221; crater on Mars? Was this something in the graphic novel, or was it something the filmmakers exploited when those photos were in the popular press a few months back, while they were still in production?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.A. Mel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161662</link>
		<dc:creator>C.A. Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161662</guid>
		<description>As just interested bystander, maybe you can answer a question for me.  How large, or massive, does an object have to be in order to have enough gravity to form a sphere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As just interested bystander, maybe you can answer a question for me.  How large, or massive, does an object have to be in order to have enough gravity to form a sphere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Perry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161597</guid>
		<description>@Peter F: I don&#039;t think this opportunity was particularly different from any other time when Deimos and MRO happen to be over the night side of Mars.  Planning imaging of Deimos (and Phobos for that matter) requires quite a bit more planning than normal HiRISE imaging because they are having to turn the spacecraft significantly off-nadir in order to pull it off.  So I think it is more of a matter of setting aside the time to plan these sequences in order to do them.  Considering that last year they took the images of Phobos, my bet is this is simply additional work that you don&#039;t want to do too often or you will strain the sequence planners, though the results are spectacular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter F: I don&#8217;t think this opportunity was particularly different from any other time when Deimos and MRO happen to be over the night side of Mars.  Planning imaging of Deimos (and Phobos for that matter) requires quite a bit more planning than normal HiRISE imaging because they are having to turn the spacecraft significantly off-nadir in order to pull it off.  So I think it is more of a matter of setting aside the time to plan these sequences in order to do them.  Considering that last year they took the images of Phobos, my bet is this is simply additional work that you don&#8217;t want to do too often or you will strain the sequence planners, though the results are spectacular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology news for 2009-03-09 &#124; Technology News</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161590</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology news for 2009-03-09 &#124; Technology News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161590</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted an item Graham English: Deimos! (via Google Reader) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted an item Graham English: Deimos! (via Google Reader) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Clevy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161588</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Clevy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161588</guid>
		<description>May I tweak your definition of regolith just a bit? Regolith isn&#039;t limited to fine particles.  There could be brecciated chunks and coarse gravels along with the sand and clay-sized particles. 

Think of regolith as soil without the organic component.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I tweak your definition of regolith just a bit? Regolith isn&#8217;t limited to fine particles.  There could be brecciated chunks and coarse gravels along with the sand and clay-sized particles. </p>
<p>Think of regolith as soil without the organic component.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin F.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161534</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161534</guid>
		<description>RE: Watchmen

The graphic novel gets some bits wrong, too - like how long it takes light to get to Pluto (I loaned mine out so I can&#039;t verify the exact quote)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Watchmen</p>
<p>The graphic novel gets some bits wrong, too &#8211; like how long it takes light to get to Pluto (I loaned mine out so I can&#8217;t verify the exact quote)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161526</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161526</guid>
		<description>Wow... that thing looks so smooth.  If it wasn&#039;t an humongous space rock I&#039;d pet it.

...It&#039;s a retarded thing to say uh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; that thing looks so smooth.  If it wasn&#8217;t an humongous space rock I&#8217;d pet it.</p>
<p>&#8230;It&#8217;s a retarded thing to say uh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter F</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161522</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161522</guid>
		<description>I have a dumb question -- how did the MRO happen to capture this shot of the moon? Was it just a chance close encounter in high Martian orbit, coincidentally a year after the amazing shots of Phobos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a dumb question &#8212; how did the MRO happen to capture this shot of the moon? Was it just a chance close encounter in high Martian orbit, coincidentally a year after the amazing shots of Phobos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161514</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161514</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
# Torbjörn Larsson, OM Says:
March 9th, 2009 at 3:21 pm

Wes, there is plenty of kinetic energy to go around even with low gravity.

# kuhnigget Says:
March 9th, 2009 at 3:28 pm

Wes, there is plenty of kinetic energy to go around even with low gravity.

Which is a polite way of saying, Smack into something at a few kilometers a second and see how big a hole you make.

# Harold Says:
March 9th, 2009 at 3:50 pm

Wes, I think the point is, the objects that caused these craters weren’t necessarily gravitationally attracted towards Deimos, they just happened to be zipping through the same volume of space that Deimos was occupying at the time, with a heck of a lot of kinetic energy and no atmosphere to slow them down. I believe the same is true of most collisions in space. Most things that were puttering along at speeds slow enough to be gravitationally captured by the various planets and moons (and/or fall onto them) were captured or accelerated by the various planets and moons billions of years ago.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


A ha! That was my mistake. I was only thinking in terms of Deimos capturing things with its gravity.  For whatever reason, the fact that these objects might already be cruising along at a high rate of speed relative to Deimos didn&#039;t occur to me. *forehead slap*

Thanks guys! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
# Torbjörn Larsson, OM Says:<br />
March 9th, 2009 at 3:21 pm</p>
<p>Wes, there is plenty of kinetic energy to go around even with low gravity.</p>
<p># kuhnigget Says:<br />
March 9th, 2009 at 3:28 pm</p>
<p>Wes, there is plenty of kinetic energy to go around even with low gravity.</p>
<p>Which is a polite way of saying, Smack into something at a few kilometers a second and see how big a hole you make.</p>
<p># Harold Says:<br />
March 9th, 2009 at 3:50 pm</p>
<p>Wes, I think the point is, the objects that caused these craters weren’t necessarily gravitationally attracted towards Deimos, they just happened to be zipping through the same volume of space that Deimos was occupying at the time, with a heck of a lot of kinetic energy and no atmosphere to slow them down. I believe the same is true of most collisions in space. Most things that were puttering along at speeds slow enough to be gravitationally captured by the various planets and moons (and/or fall onto them) were captured or accelerated by the various planets and moons billions of years ago.</p></blockquote>
<p>A ha! That was my mistake. I was only thinking in terms of Deimos capturing things with its gravity.  For whatever reason, the fact that these objects might already be cruising along at a high rate of speed relative to Deimos didn&#8217;t occur to me. *forehead slap*</p>
<p>Thanks guys! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161481</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161481</guid>
		<description>Wes, I think the point is, the objects that caused these craters weren&#039;t necessarily gravitationally attracted towards Deimos, they just happened to be zipping through the same volume of space that Deimos was occupying at the time, with a heck of a lot of kinetic energy and no atmosphere to slow them down.  I believe the same is true of most collisions in space.  Most things that were puttering along at speeds slow enough to be gravitationally captured by the various planets and moons (and/or fall onto them) were captured or accelerated by the various planets and moons billions of years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes, I think the point is, the objects that caused these craters weren&#8217;t necessarily gravitationally attracted towards Deimos, they just happened to be zipping through the same volume of space that Deimos was occupying at the time, with a heck of a lot of kinetic energy and no atmosphere to slow them down.  I believe the same is true of most collisions in space.  Most things that were puttering along at speeds slow enough to be gravitationally captured by the various planets and moons (and/or fall onto them) were captured or accelerated by the various planets and moons billions of years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Other Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161479</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161479</guid>
		<description>Hurray!  I&#039;ve got one of the HiRISE photos of Phobos as my wallpaper.  I&#039;ve just been waiting for a good photo of Deimos that I can put up on the other screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurray!  I&#8217;ve got one of the HiRISE photos of Phobos as my wallpaper.  I&#8217;ve just been waiting for a good photo of Deimos that I can put up on the other screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuhnigget</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161473</link>
		<dc:creator>kuhnigget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161473</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Wes, there is plenty of kinetic energy to go around even with low gravity.&lt;/i&gt;

Which is a polite way of saying, Smack into something at a few kilometers a second and see how big a hole &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Wes, there is plenty of kinetic energy to go around even with low gravity.</i></p>
<p>Which is a polite way of saying, Smack into something at a few kilometers a second and see how big a hole <i>you</i> make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjörn Larsson, OM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161470</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjörn Larsson, OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161470</guid>
		<description>Wes, there is plenty of kinetic energy to go around even with low gravity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes, there is plenty of kinetic energy to go around even with low gravity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjörn Larsson, OM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161469</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjörn Larsson, OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161469</guid>
		<description>A pretty Deimostration of HiRISE capability.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
over the horizon, are Deimos and Phobos… but they are WAY too big and round, like two Lunas up in the salmon sky.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Um, haven&#039;t seen the movie yet, but I believe that is compatible with the Watchmen universe. 

AFAIU Dr Manhattan could change mass and form of any objects, and teleport them to any orbit to boot. (Possible spoiler alert: And I believe he was redecorating some of the landscape, so it would even be likely if there was any noticeable differences.)

Not that I would let up on pointing out any Bad Astronomy underlying the movie.

[The button misadventures must be in the movie, not the comic where the fallen body is never shown IIRC.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pretty Deimostration of HiRISE capability.</p>
<blockquote><p>
over the horizon, are Deimos and Phobos… but they are WAY too big and round, like two Lunas up in the salmon sky.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Um, haven&#8217;t seen the movie yet, but I believe that is compatible with the Watchmen universe. </p>
<p>AFAIU Dr Manhattan could change mass and form of any objects, and teleport them to any orbit to boot. (Possible spoiler alert: And I believe he was redecorating some of the landscape, so it would even be likely if there was any noticeable differences.)</p>
<p>Not that I would let up on pointing out any Bad Astronomy underlying the movie.</p>
<p>[The button misadventures must be in the movie, not the comic where the fallen body is never shown IIRC.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/comment-page-1/#comment-161467</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/09/deimos/#comment-161467</guid>
		<description>Oops, made a typo.  &quot;This&quot; in the last sentence above should be &quot;The&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, made a typo.  &#8220;This&#8221; in the last sentence above should be &#8220;The&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 10:05:53 -->
