<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientists in the movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientists are evil, emotionless, conniving bastards or superheroes, or something. Do we have movies to thank? &#171; The Biology Files</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-2/#comment-344883</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientists are evil, emotionless, conniving bastards or superheroes, or something. Do we have movies to thank? &#171; The Biology Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-344883</guid>
		<description>[...] with a magazine, then they&#8217;re the saviors, the ones who can enter with the science babble and save the world at the right moment (although that&#8217;s just so, well, fifties, isn&#8217;t it?). Unless, of course, they&#8217;re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with a magazine, then they&#8217;re the saviors, the ones who can enter with the science babble and save the world at the right moment (although that&#8217;s just so, well, fifties, isn&#8217;t it?). Unless, of course, they&#8217;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EVIL, movie scientists give science and scientists a BAD rep. &#171; Science Square</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-2/#comment-235660</link>
		<dc:creator>EVIL, movie scientists give science and scientists a BAD rep. &#171; Science Square</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 06:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-235660</guid>
		<description>[...] TV, films boldly go down scientific path. Via Scientists in the movies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TV, films boldly go down scientific path. Via Scientists in the movies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In which I SEE and agree with Dustin Hoffman &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-2/#comment-192575</link>
		<dc:creator>In which I SEE and agree with Dustin Hoffman &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-192575</guid>
		<description>[...] already producing results, and I fully plan on getting more involved with them as time goes on. The portrayal of science and scientists in movies is important to me, so I heartily stand behind SEE&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already producing results, and I fully plan on getting more involved with them as time goes on. The portrayal of science and scientists in movies is important to me, so I heartily stand behind SEE&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In which I SEE and agree with Dustin Hoffman &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-2/#comment-192576</link>
		<dc:creator>In which I SEE and agree with Dustin Hoffman &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-192576</guid>
		<description>[...] already producing results, and I fully plan on getting more involved with them as time goes on. The portrayal of science and scientists in movies is important to me, so I heartily stand behind SEE&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already producing results, and I fully plan on getting more involved with them as time goes on. The portrayal of science and scientists in movies is important to me, so I heartily stand behind SEE&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleges That Offer CSI Degrees &#124; Crime Scene Investigation Info</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-2/#comment-176212</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleges That Offer CSI Degrees &#124; Crime Scene Investigation Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-176212</guid>
		<description>[...]  Scientists in the movies &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Scientists in the movies | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Hoffman campaigning for better science in science-fiction movies - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-171372</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Hoffman campaigning for better science in science-fiction movies - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-171372</guid>
		<description>[...] BA Blog: Scientists in the movies   Quote: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BA Blog: Scientists in the movies   Quote: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechyDad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-168318</link>
		<dc:creator>TechyDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-168318</guid>
		<description>@Naked Bunny with a Whip,

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;i&gt;does this mean all scientists have giant blue penises?&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, including the women.

It comes with the doctorate, I think.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It turns blue when you get your PhD?  Boy, am I glad I stopped at Bachelor&#039;s! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Naked Bunny with a Whip,</p>
<blockquote><p>
<i>does this mean all scientists have giant blue penises?</i></p>
<p>Yes, including the women.</p>
<p>It comes with the doctorate, I think.
</p></blockquote>
<p>It turns blue when you get your PhD?  Boy, am I glad I stopped at Bachelor&#8217;s! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is it the Dawn of a Golden Age for Hollywood Science? &#124; The Intersection &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-168305</link>
		<dc:creator>Is it the Dawn of a Golden Age for Hollywood Science? &#124; The Intersection &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-168305</guid>
		<description>[...] the contention in Dan Vergano&#8217;s recent USA Today article, which Phil just blogged. Based upon the experience of writing about scientists in Hollywood for Unscientific America, let [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the contention in Dan Vergano&#8217;s recent USA Today article, which Phil just blogged. Based upon the experience of writing about scientists in Hollywood for Unscientific America, let [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Meils</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-168167</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Meils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-168167</guid>
		<description>Science fiction movies and TV (and in some cases books)have a long way to go in depicting reality correctly... It&#039;s not just scientists who get their image skewed by the media. Honestly, when was the last time you tuned into Star Trek, and noticed anyone &quot;popping&quot; their ears from the difference in pressure between the ship and the planet&#039;s atmosphere? When was the last time you saw a movie about Mars, where people stayed in their spacesuits? 

One of the more accepted definitions of science fiction is that you are allowed ONE major change in what we know to be true... (say, FTL drives) and then you try to build everything else up logically from there. Current storytelling fashion seems to have drifted from that, and people are getting a distorted view about what&#039;s possible, and what the universe is really like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science fiction movies and TV (and in some cases books)have a long way to go in depicting reality correctly&#8230; It&#8217;s not just scientists who get their image skewed by the media. Honestly, when was the last time you tuned into Star Trek, and noticed anyone &#8220;popping&#8221; their ears from the difference in pressure between the ship and the planet&#8217;s atmosphere? When was the last time you saw a movie about Mars, where people stayed in their spacesuits? </p>
<p>One of the more accepted definitions of science fiction is that you are allowed ONE major change in what we know to be true&#8230; (say, FTL drives) and then you try to build everything else up logically from there. Current storytelling fashion seems to have drifted from that, and people are getting a distorted view about what&#8217;s possible, and what the universe is really like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CincyJeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-168155</link>
		<dc:creator>CincyJeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-168155</guid>
		<description>Jack,
Sorry I missed out on Phil&#039;s yellow book give away! I&#039;m 
sure I would have enjoyed it, but my daughter had surgery 
last week and I stayed with her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,<br />
Sorry I missed out on Phil&#8217;s yellow book give away! I&#8217;m<br />
sure I would have enjoyed it, but my daughter had surgery<br />
last week and I stayed with her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-168053</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-168053</guid>
		<description>Naked Bunny with a Whip said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;And yes, all scientists are doctors. Doctors of Science, to be specific.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, I don&#039;t know about elsewhere but that&#039;s not so in the UK.

I have a PhD so I am  Doctor of Philosophy (remember that before the word &quot;science&quot; existed, the investigation of the natural world was called Natural Philosophy).

There does exist the DSc, Doctor of Science, but it is only ever awarded as a high honour for a significant amount of achievement in science.  It is not a degree for which you can specifically study.  At my doctoral graduation, there were perhaps 10 or 12 PhDs awarded, but just one DSc, and it was a hugely big deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naked Bunny with a Whip said:</p>
<blockquote><p>And yes, all scientists are doctors. Doctors of Science, to be specific.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know about elsewhere but that&#8217;s not so in the UK.</p>
<p>I have a PhD so I am  Doctor of Philosophy (remember that before the word &#8220;science&#8221; existed, the investigation of the natural world was called Natural Philosophy).</p>
<p>There does exist the DSc, Doctor of Science, but it is only ever awarded as a high honour for a significant amount of achievement in science.  It is not a degree for which you can specifically study.  At my doctoral graduation, there were perhaps 10 or 12 PhDs awarded, but just one DSc, and it was a hugely big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-168048</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-168048</guid>
		<description>T.E.L. said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;. . . Science has been happening for quite a while, since long before the movies. . . &lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is irrelevant, because the amount of government funding going into science before the cold war was insignificant (not counting the Manhatten Project, which was really a science / engineering collaboration with the goal of making the biggest ever bomb).

IIUC, &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; of the science that was done before the 20th century was privately funded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T.E.L. said:</p>
<blockquote><p>. . . Science has been happening for quite a while, since long before the movies. . . </p></blockquote>
<p>This is irrelevant, because the amount of government funding going into science before the cold war was insignificant (not counting the Manhatten Project, which was really a science / engineering collaboration with the goal of making the biggest ever bomb).</p>
<p>IIUC, <i>all</i> of the science that was done before the 20th century was privately funded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-168035</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-168035</guid>
		<description>Vulcans&#039; poor people skills (with humans, Bajorans, etc.) make them a poor example and role model.  Although Spock got to be a babe magnet in regular rotation.  You think Kirk always got the girl (or had done so at a stardate prior to opening this week&#039;s captain&#039;s log) but Spock, McCoy, and Scott had their turns.  If she was an android, only the captain&#039;s advanced skills would do, usually.

The image of scientists matters enough for a prototype space shuttle to be named Enterprise...  And prior to that, there is a MAD magazine feature fancifully showing how after being frightened by Sputnik a message was to be presented in all U.S. popular media (can they do that?) that science is cool.

The senior MST3K scientist is widowed, possibly in a laboratory accident, or else marooned in space and his wife cashed in the insurance years ago.  He has a beautiful daughter for the bold young hero to charm and for the audience to look at with various motivations, but if her mother was around to advise her then the bold young hero would get a lot more of the cold shoulder, so she isn&#039;t and he doesn&#039;t.  So it&#039;s just whether the monster gets her or he does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vulcans&#8217; poor people skills (with humans, Bajorans, etc.) make them a poor example and role model.  Although Spock got to be a babe magnet in regular rotation.  You think Kirk always got the girl (or had done so at a stardate prior to opening this week&#8217;s captain&#8217;s log) but Spock, McCoy, and Scott had their turns.  If she was an android, only the captain&#8217;s advanced skills would do, usually.</p>
<p>The image of scientists matters enough for a prototype space shuttle to be named Enterprise&#8230;  And prior to that, there is a MAD magazine feature fancifully showing how after being frightened by Sputnik a message was to be presented in all U.S. popular media (can they do that?) that science is cool.</p>
<p>The senior MST3K scientist is widowed, possibly in a laboratory accident, or else marooned in space and his wife cashed in the insurance years ago.  He has a beautiful daughter for the bold young hero to charm and for the audience to look at with various motivations, but if her mother was around to advise her then the bold young hero would get a lot more of the cold shoulder, so she isn&#8217;t and he doesn&#8217;t.  So it&#8217;s just whether the monster gets her or he does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-168004</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-168004</guid>
		<description>I went to that article knife in hand mumbling &quot;you&#039;d better talk about the best scientist in the movies ever or I&#039;ll pick a plane, go there and rip open a lot of guts&quot;, but not only I found the name... but it was even you, Phil, the one who brough he in! Dr. Strangelove rocks.

Manveet, I think you are being narrow there: movies and tv have a lot of path to do to treat with respect almost everyone, not just scientist. In that way I think we are matched with everyone else.

On a sidenote, I&#039;m a mathematician and sometimes I wonder how much of my desire to become this came from Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park). Heavens, he was definetively a cool scientist: dressed in black, staring through the sun-glasses and using chaos theory talkings as a women seduction weapon!

Thinking twice with the knife still in my hand, I come to think that, anyway, I miss Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth mentioned in that article. So if you see a small angry spaniard with a knife in hand screaming &quot;what about Futuramaaa&quot;, you should better hide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to that article knife in hand mumbling &#8220;you&#8217;d better talk about the best scientist in the movies ever or I&#8217;ll pick a plane, go there and rip open a lot of guts&#8221;, but not only I found the name&#8230; but it was even you, Phil, the one who brough he in! Dr. Strangelove rocks.</p>
<p>Manveet, I think you are being narrow there: movies and tv have a lot of path to do to treat with respect almost everyone, not just scientist. In that way I think we are matched with everyone else.</p>
<p>On a sidenote, I&#8217;m a mathematician and sometimes I wonder how much of my desire to become this came from Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park). Heavens, he was definetively a cool scientist: dressed in black, staring through the sun-glasses and using chaos theory talkings as a women seduction weapon!</p>
<p>Thinking twice with the knife still in my hand, I come to think that, anyway, I miss Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth mentioned in that article. So if you see a small angry spaniard with a knife in hand screaming &#8220;what about Futuramaaa&#8221;, you should better hide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167969</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167969</guid>
		<description>CincyJeff Says: &quot;Sam Jaffe’s Prof. Jacob Barnhardt, Gene Barry’s Dr. Clayton Forrester, and Rex Reason’s Dr. Cal Meacham seemed like upstanding role models, and two out of three ended up with the girl!...I always wanted to be Morbius and get my hands on that Krell technology!&quot;

All of whom are examined in some detail in the yellow book that Phil was giving away last week.

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CincyJeff Says: &#8220;Sam Jaffe’s Prof. Jacob Barnhardt, Gene Barry’s Dr. Clayton Forrester, and Rex Reason’s Dr. Cal Meacham seemed like upstanding role models, and two out of three ended up with the girl!&#8230;I always wanted to be Morbius and get my hands on that Krell technology!&#8221;</p>
<p>All of whom are examined in some detail in the yellow book that Phil was giving away last week.</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Stacey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167878</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167878</guid>
		<description>The enemies aren&#039;t massed at the gate.

They&#039;re on the school board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The enemies aren&#8217;t massed at the gate.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re on the school board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167847</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167847</guid>
		<description>O/T: You can sign up to send your name on a microchip to Mars. You still get a nice online certificate and you don&#039;t even need to submit any email address. 

Phil, you usually are pretty quick on having people sign petitions for various things. This is a fun little one.

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/participate/sendyourname/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O/T: You can sign up to send your name on a microchip to Mars. You still get a nice online certificate and you don&#8217;t even need to submit any email address. </p>
<p>Phil, you usually are pretty quick on having people sign petitions for various things. This is a fun little one.</p>
<p><a href="http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/participate/sendyourname/" rel="nofollow">http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/participate/sendyourname/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167845</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167845</guid>
		<description>*checks*
Alas, no giant blue penis.  But, I don&#039;t have a PhD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*checks*<br />
Alas, no giant blue penis.  But, I don&#8217;t have a PhD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CincyJeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167841</link>
		<dc:creator>CincyJeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167841</guid>
		<description>Sam Jaffe&#039;s Prof. Jacob Barnhardt, Gene Barry&#039;s Dr. Clayton Forrester, and Rex Reason&#039;s Dr. Cal Meacham seemed like upstanding role models, and two out of three ended up with the girl!  Alas, poor Kevin McCarthy, being a mere MD, got dumped by a pod.  But hey, on the down low, I always wanted to be Morbius and get my hands on that Krell technology!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam Jaffe&#8217;s Prof. Jacob Barnhardt, Gene Barry&#8217;s Dr. Clayton Forrester, and Rex Reason&#8217;s Dr. Cal Meacham seemed like upstanding role models, and two out of three ended up with the girl!  Alas, poor Kevin McCarthy, being a mere MD, got dumped by a pod.  But hey, on the down low, I always wanted to be Morbius and get my hands on that Krell technology!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manveet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167831</link>
		<dc:creator>Manveet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167831</guid>
		<description>Movies and television still have a long way to go with respect to how they represent scientists. 

Most movies and television series still portray scientists as either awkward beta losers (e.g. The Big Bang Theory), or as mad scientists bent on destroying the world.

We still need more role models that make being a scientist cool. Unfortunately Richard Feynman and Carl Sagan are no longer with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Movies and television still have a long way to go with respect to how they represent scientists. </p>
<p>Most movies and television series still portray scientists as either awkward beta losers (e.g. The Big Bang Theory), or as mad scientists bent on destroying the world.</p>
<p>We still need more role models that make being a scientist cool. Unfortunately Richard Feynman and Carl Sagan are no longer with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manveet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167829</link>
		<dc:creator>Manveet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167829</guid>
		<description>Movies and television still have a long way to go with respect to how they represent scientists. 

Most movies and television series still portray scientists as either awkward beta losers (e.g. The Big Bang Theory), or as mad scientists bent on destroying the world.

We still need more role models that make being a scientist cool. Richard Feynman and Carl Sagan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Movies and television still have a long way to go with respect to how they represent scientists. </p>
<p>Most movies and television series still portray scientists as either awkward beta losers (e.g. The Big Bang Theory), or as mad scientists bent on destroying the world.</p>
<p>We still need more role models that make being a scientist cool. Richard Feynman and Carl Sagan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167787</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167787</guid>
		<description>The Quiet Earth was indeed a good film although the arrogant scientist meme is used, but not by the main character who portrays a sometimes naked cross-dressing scientist instead. :) But there&#039;s good reason for that and it just highlights his humanity all the more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Quiet Earth was indeed a good film although the arrogant scientist meme is used, but not by the main character who portrays a sometimes naked cross-dressing scientist instead. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  But there&#8217;s good reason for that and it just highlights his humanity all the more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.E.L.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167692</link>
		<dc:creator>T.E.L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167692</guid>
		<description>Chris A.,

Me thinks you live in a fantasy world in which there is no end to enemies massed at the gate. Apparently the Bush era lives on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris A.,</p>
<p>Me thinks you live in a fantasy world in which there is no end to enemies massed at the gate. Apparently the Bush era lives on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naked Bunny with a Whip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167685</link>
		<dc:creator>Naked Bunny with a Whip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167685</guid>
		<description>Everything I know about scientists I learned from &quot;Mystery Science Theater 3000&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything I know about scientists I learned from &#8220;Mystery Science Theater 3000&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjörn Larsson, OM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-167676</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjörn Larsson, OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/26/scientists-in-the-movies/#comment-167676</guid>
		<description>Speaking of having more portrayal of actual trial and error, which Carroll mentions in the article, I just saw a television serial of &lt;i&gt;The Andromeda Strain&lt;/i&gt; which had some superficial coverage of that. (And infrastructure falling to pieces, of course.)

Not as good as the book though. And it isn&#039;t every lab that has an atomic bomb sitting in the basement for sterilization.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
rather than someone who works with a team of fellow scientists, methodically investigating a problem and then coming up with a solution based on all their observations.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

kuhnigget, somehow you got me thinking of &lt;i&gt;House&lt;/i&gt; - and not because of the lone maverick in charge. ;-) Close enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of having more portrayal of actual trial and error, which Carroll mentions in the article, I just saw a television serial of <i>The Andromeda Strain</i> which had some superficial coverage of that. (And infrastructure falling to pieces, of course.)</p>
<p>Not as good as the book though. And it isn&#8217;t every lab that has an atomic bomb sitting in the basement for sterilization.</p>
<blockquote><p>
rather than someone who works with a team of fellow scientists, methodically investigating a problem and then coming up with a solution based on all their observations.
</p></blockquote>
<p>kuhnigget, somehow you got me thinking of <i>House</i> &#8211; and not because of the lone maverick in charge. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Close enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 13:50:38 -->
