<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So, you wanna be a skeptic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:16:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AlexKenas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/comment-page-2/#comment-220528</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexKenas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/#comment-220528</guid>
		<description>To be a skeptic, you cannot just cherry pick individual cases. For example: you cannot simply say that all psychics are frauds just because Sylvia Browne is a perfect example of a psychic fraud. It is important to be skeptical. However, skepticism must not lead to aragance. Skepticism is open-mindedness. In other words, you have to be accepting of every bit of evidence. Even anecdotal evidence is considered evidence, although, it is worth squat. Anyone can say anything but that doesn&#039;t make it true. You have to consider the authencity of the evidence before you make assumptions on it. There are people who make crap up just to get attention. However, many people do tell the truth when they speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be a skeptic, you cannot just cherry pick individual cases. For example: you cannot simply say that all psychics are frauds just because Sylvia Browne is a perfect example of a psychic fraud. It is important to be skeptical. However, skepticism must not lead to aragance. Skepticism is open-mindedness. In other words, you have to be accepting of every bit of evidence. Even anecdotal evidence is considered evidence, although, it is worth squat. Anyone can say anything but that doesn&#8217;t make it true. You have to consider the authencity of the evidence before you make assumptions on it. There are people who make crap up just to get attention. However, many people do tell the truth when they speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreThink &#187; Skepticism or, knowledge trumps belief</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/comment-page-2/#comment-200010</link>
		<dc:creator>FreThink &#187; Skepticism or, knowledge trumps belief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/#comment-200010</guid>
		<description>[...] So, you wanna be a skeptic? (blogs.discovermagazine.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, you wanna be a skeptic? (blogs.discovermagazine.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic mix tape &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/comment-page-2/#comment-192534</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic mix tape &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/#comment-192534</guid>
		<description>[...] editor of the Junior Skeptic portion of Skeptic Magazine, and was the driving force behind &quot;What Do I Do Next?&quot;, a practical guide to active [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] editor of the Junior Skeptic portion of Skeptic Magazine, and was the driving force behind &quot;What Do I Do Next?&quot;, a practical guide to active [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/comment-page-2/#comment-170505</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/#comment-170505</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yeah, but what a big cloud of dust it is. I don’t see anything left at the bottom except dust.&quot;

Well, you cannot see through dust.  and you are obviosly not seeing , or seeing something else from what I see in the videos and aftermath photos. Because there sure as heck was a more than dust left. All of this ignores the obscene amount of explosives you&#039;d need for you alleged &#039;dusitification&#039; to take place.  Any such level explosives, even with shaped charges would resemble a true explosion...not &#039;the block disappears into a cloud of dust&#039;. 

This is, quite frankly, silly.

&quot;The videos I saw, the noise seemed pretty scary and deafening loud.&quot;

But not the sound of explosive charges. Not like that all.  There is a huge difference between the massive rumbling sounds of the collapsing towers and demolition charges going off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yeah, but what a big cloud of dust it is. I don’t see anything left at the bottom except dust.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, you cannot see through dust.  and you are obviosly not seeing , or seeing something else from what I see in the videos and aftermath photos. Because there sure as heck was a more than dust left. All of this ignores the obscene amount of explosives you&#8217;d need for you alleged &#8216;dusitification&#8217; to take place.  Any such level explosives, even with shaped charges would resemble a true explosion&#8230;not &#8216;the block disappears into a cloud of dust&#8217;. </p>
<p>This is, quite frankly, silly.</p>
<p>&#8220;The videos I saw, the noise seemed pretty scary and deafening loud.&#8221;</p>
<p>But not the sound of explosive charges. Not like that all.  There is a huge difference between the massive rumbling sounds of the collapsing towers and demolition charges going off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/comment-page-2/#comment-170411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/#comment-170411</guid>
		<description>&quot;For another, what you are claiming to see is not was is on the videos. The buildings are not being turned into fine dust, they are being obscured as they fall into a cloud of dust made by drywall, concrete, etc.&quot;

Yeah, but what a big cloud of dust it is.  I don&#039;t see anything left at the bottom except dust.   

The videos I saw, the noise seemed pretty scary and deafening loud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For another, what you are claiming to see is not was is on the videos. The buildings are not being turned into fine dust, they are being obscured as they fall into a cloud of dust made by drywall, concrete, etc.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, but what a big cloud of dust it is.  I don&#8217;t see anything left at the bottom except dust.   </p>
<p>The videos I saw, the noise seemed pretty scary and deafening loud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/comment-page-2/#comment-170370</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/#comment-170370</guid>
		<description>&quot;twin towers: yes there are videos, the very ones that show the buildings “collapsing”. But look more carefully at them, the buildings are being turned to fine dust from the top down. Dude, what’s the biggie about demolitions? They do it everyday in Las Vegas, for heaven’s sake.&quot;

For one thing, they never do a building as large as the WTC towers. 

For another, what you are claiming to see is not was is on the videos. The buildings are not being turned into fine dust, they are being obscured as they fall into a cloud of dust made by drywall, concrete, etc. 

Also, the explosives that would turn something the size of that WTC block into &#039;fine powder&#039; would make enough noise to be heard in the heartland. None of the videos, nor does anyone in NYC say they heard sounds that loud. If you get a chance, go view a few building demolitions live. You might notice the explosives are pretty loud and sharp. They are nothing like the rumbling of the tower collapse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;twin towers: yes there are videos, the very ones that show the buildings “collapsing”. But look more carefully at them, the buildings are being turned to fine dust from the top down. Dude, what’s the biggie about demolitions? They do it everyday in Las Vegas, for heaven’s sake.&#8221;</p>
<p>For one thing, they never do a building as large as the WTC towers. </p>
<p>For another, what you are claiming to see is not was is on the videos. The buildings are not being turned into fine dust, they are being obscured as they fall into a cloud of dust made by drywall, concrete, etc. </p>
<p>Also, the explosives that would turn something the size of that WTC block into &#8216;fine powder&#8217; would make enough noise to be heard in the heartland. None of the videos, nor does anyone in NYC say they heard sounds that loud. If you get a chance, go view a few building demolitions live. You might notice the explosives are pretty loud and sharp. They are nothing like the rumbling of the tower collapse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/comment-page-2/#comment-170253</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/30/so-you-wanna-be-a-skeptic/#comment-170253</guid>
		<description>Inquiring Mind:

alien abductees:  only personal accounts of their experience usually from hypnotic regression of &quot;missing time&quot;.  I&#039;m not aware of videos that aren&#039;t hoaxes or too fuzzy to be taken seriously.

twin towers:  yes there are videos, the very ones that show the buildings &quot;collapsing&quot;.   But look more carefully at them, the buildings are being turned to fine dust from the top down.  Dude, what&#039;s the biggie about demolitions?  They do it everyday in Las Vegas, for heaven&#039;s sake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inquiring Mind:</p>
<p>alien abductees:  only personal accounts of their experience usually from hypnotic regression of &#8220;missing time&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not aware of videos that aren&#8217;t hoaxes or too fuzzy to be taken seriously.</p>
<p>twin towers:  yes there are videos, the very ones that show the buildings &#8220;collapsing&#8221;.   But look more carefully at them, the buildings are being turned to fine dust from the top down.  Dude, what&#8217;s the biggie about demolitions?  They do it everyday in Las Vegas, for heaven&#8217;s sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
