<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jenny McCarthy counts for something</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:56:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peaquod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/comment-page-4/#comment-227177</link>
		<dc:creator>Peaquod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/#comment-227177</guid>
		<description>I have never visited this site before, and only stumbled across this article by chance.  After reading most of the comments, from both parties, it is immediately apparent that there is a huge gulf in the intelligence levels between the two &#039;camps&#039; in this debate.  
On the one side, there are some articulate, well-argued points, backed up with clear reference and meaningful citations, and on the other, there are those who are against vaccinations.  
Whether you are for or against vaccinations should not be of any concern; the fact that many of you are unable to form a cogent argument, or even correctly structure a sentence is a far more important issue, and one which needs addressing far more urgently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never visited this site before, and only stumbled across this article by chance.  After reading most of the comments, from both parties, it is immediately apparent that there is a huge gulf in the intelligence levels between the two &#8216;camps&#8217; in this debate.<br />
On the one side, there are some articulate, well-argued points, backed up with clear reference and meaningful citations, and on the other, there are those who are against vaccinations.<br />
Whether you are for or against vaccinations should not be of any concern; the fact that many of you are unable to form a cogent argument, or even correctly structure a sentence is a far more important issue, and one which needs addressing far more urgently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Geek Law&#8217; from wired.co.uk &#171; Thumbs of Fury</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/comment-page-4/#comment-226042</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Geek Law&#8217; from wired.co.uk &#171; Thumbs of Fury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/#comment-226042</guid>
		<description>[...] 4. Somers and McCarthy&#8217;s Law: There is no dangerous unscientific theory so preposterous that no celebrity will espouse and advocate it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4. Somers and McCarthy&#8217;s Law: There is no dangerous unscientific theory so preposterous that no celebrity will espouse and advocate it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Geeky Laws That Should Exist, But Don’t &#171; Coolbeans</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/comment-page-4/#comment-225378</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Geeky Laws That Should Exist, But Don’t &#171; Coolbeans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/#comment-225378</guid>
		<description>[...] Somers and McCarthy&#8217;s Law: There is no dangerous unscientific theory so preposterous that no celebrity will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Somers and McCarthy&#8217;s Law: There is no dangerous unscientific theory so preposterous that no celebrity will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Geeky Laws That Should Exist, But Don’t @ Technology News</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/comment-page-4/#comment-225334</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Geeky Laws That Should Exist, But Don’t @ Technology News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/#comment-225334</guid>
		<description>[...] Somers and McCarthy&#8217;s Law: There is no dangerous unscientific theory so preposterous that no celebrity will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Somers and McCarthy&#8217;s Law: There is no dangerous unscientific theory so preposterous that no celebrity will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Johnston</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/comment-page-4/#comment-204138</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/#comment-204138</guid>
		<description>Last night (5thAUG2009) Coast to Coast A.M. with George Noory spent 4 HOURS spreading anti-vaccination propaganda. A &quot;panel of experts&quot; was telling the listeners to avoid all inoculations at any cost. It was appalling. Here in Canada that broadcast could probably get the program banned as posing a threat to public health. I&#039;m glad that the Bad Astronomer no longer appears on Coast to Coast. That show has become consistently alarmist, reactionary and hostile towards science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night (5thAUG2009) Coast to Coast A.M. with George Noory spent 4 HOURS spreading anti-vaccination propaganda. A &#8220;panel of experts&#8221; was telling the listeners to avoid all inoculations at any cost. It was appalling. Here in Canada that broadcast could probably get the program banned as posing a threat to public health. I&#8217;m glad that the Bad Astronomer no longer appears on Coast to Coast. That show has become consistently alarmist, reactionary and hostile towards science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What really is the harm? &#124; Diversified Interests</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/comment-page-4/#comment-199454</link>
		<dc:creator>What really is the harm? &#124; Diversified Interests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/#comment-199454</guid>
		<description>[...] and emotionally. It destroys their ability to think critically. And then we get people like Jenny McCarthy, or the parents who used homeopathy and killed their child, or the proven fraud Peter Popoff making [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and emotionally. It destroys their ability to think critically. And then we get people like Jenny McCarthy, or the parents who used homeopathy and killed their child, or the proven fraud Peter Popoff making [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8230; and the blind shall see &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/comment-page-4/#comment-182574</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8230; and the blind shall see &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 21:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/02/jenny-mccarthy-counts-for-something/#comment-182574</guid>
		<description>[...] and emotionally. It destroys their ability to think critically. And then we get people like Jenny McCarthy, or the parents who used homeopathy and killed their child, or the proven fraud Peter Popoff making [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and emotionally. It destroys their ability to think critically. And then we get people like Jenny McCarthy, or the parents who used homeopathy and killed their child, or the proven fraud Peter Popoff making [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
