<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dune Mars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:28:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Parrrrrrrre&#8230; iiiiiiiiii&#8230; doooooooliaaaaa! &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/comment-page-2/#comment-195060</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrrrrrrre&#8230; iiiiiiiiii&#8230; doooooooliaaaaa! &#124; Bad Astronomy &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/#comment-195060</guid>
		<description>[...] in April, I posted an incredibly beautiful picture of sand dunes on Mars taken by the HIRISE camera. Here&#8217;s the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in April, I posted an incredibly beautiful picture of sand dunes on Mars taken by the HIRISE camera. Here&#8217;s the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter - Page 16 - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/comment-page-2/#comment-175641</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter - Page 16 - Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/#comment-175641</guid>
		<description>[...] What do you think that would look like? I bet it would appear to be something like this: [...]    Dune Mars in the BA&#039;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What do you think that would look like? I bet it would appear to be something like this: [...]    Dune Mars in the BA&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dunas de arena Barchan en Marte &#124; Imagen astronomía diaria - Observatorio</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/comment-page-2/#comment-175561</link>
		<dc:creator>Dunas de arena Barchan en Marte &#124; Imagen astronomía diaria - Observatorio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/#comment-175561</guid>
		<description>[...] y se evaporan rápidamente en la delgada atmósfera de Marte, los persistentes vientos pueden hacer parecer a las grandes dunas de arena fluir e incluso gotear como un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] y se evaporan rápidamente en la delgada atmósfera de Marte, los persistentes vientos pueden hacer parecer a las grandes dunas de arena fluir e incluso gotear como un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Marking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/comment-page-2/#comment-174459</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Marking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/#comment-174459</guid>
		<description>@paul &quot;Human explorers have one infinite advantage over probes- on the spot intuition and reaction. Any robotic explorer will always be constrained by their rigid programing and a minimal 20 minute lag between itself and controllers.&quot;

Mars came within 55,758,000 km of Earth on August 27, 2003.  Light would have taken 3.1 minutes to go from Earth to Mars, and 6.2 minutes for a round-trip.  So that&#039;s considerably less than the &quot;minimal 20 minute lag&quot; being cited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@paul &#8220;Human explorers have one infinite advantage over probes- on the spot intuition and reaction. Any robotic explorer will always be constrained by their rigid programing and a minimal 20 minute lag between itself and controllers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mars came within 55,758,000 km of Earth on August 27, 2003.  Light would have taken 3.1 minutes to go from Earth to Mars, and 6.2 minutes for a round-trip.  So that&#8217;s considerably less than the &#8220;minimal 20 minute lag&#8221; being cited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Marking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/comment-page-2/#comment-174455</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Marking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/#comment-174455</guid>
		<description>@Todd W. &quot;Thanks for the numbers and the explanation as to why it would be that long.&quot;

Click on my name for a link to a good web page which gives the derivation of these numbers.  Over on the left side you want to select:

21b. Fly to Mars! (1)
21c. Fly to Mars! (2)
21d. Fly to Mars! (3)

They derive a wait time at Mars of 454 days which is approximately the same as the 14.9 months I calculated myself.  So those links have all the details.  Probably more than you wanted to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Todd W. &#8220;Thanks for the numbers and the explanation as to why it would be that long.&#8221;</p>
<p>Click on my name for a link to a good web page which gives the derivation of these numbers.  Over on the left side you want to select:</p>
<p>21b. Fly to Mars! (1)<br />
21c. Fly to Mars! (2)<br />
21d. Fly to Mars! (3)</p>
<p>They derive a wait time at Mars of 454 days which is approximately the same as the 14.9 months I calculated myself.  So those links have all the details.  Probably more than you wanted to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd W.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/comment-page-2/#comment-174446</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/#comment-174446</guid>
		<description>@Tom Marking

Thanks for the numbers and the explanation as to why it would be that long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tom Marking</p>
<p>Thanks for the numbers and the explanation as to why it would be that long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Marking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/comment-page-2/#comment-174443</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Marking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/13/dune-mars-2/#comment-174443</guid>
		<description>@Todd W &quot;And talking about a year-long sit on the planet is jumping the gun a bit, dontcha think? Any manned mission would probably be only a few days at most for the first bunch of missions. Year-long stints would be quite a ways off.&quot;

The first manned missions to Mars will be constrained by fuel efficiency are are likely to use Hohmann transfer orbits.  In such a mission the total time is 30.67 to 33.19 months with a waiting time at Mars of 14.91 months.  The 15-month delay at Mars is needed for the proper realignment of the Earth-versus-Mars position to occur.  Thus, a more than 1 year wait at Mars is to be expected for the first Mars mission.  How much of that time is spent on the surface of Mars is anyone&#039;s guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Todd W &#8220;And talking about a year-long sit on the planet is jumping the gun a bit, dontcha think? Any manned mission would probably be only a few days at most for the first bunch of missions. Year-long stints would be quite a ways off.&#8221;</p>
<p>The first manned missions to Mars will be constrained by fuel efficiency are are likely to use Hohmann transfer orbits.  In such a mission the total time is 30.67 to 33.19 months with a waiting time at Mars of 14.91 months.  The 15-month delay at Mars is needed for the proper realignment of the Earth-versus-Mars position to occur.  Thus, a more than 1 year wait at Mars is to be expected for the first Mars mission.  How much of that time is spent on the surface of Mars is anyone&#8217;s guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
