<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrity engorgements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:57:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-418772</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-418772</guid>
		<description>Of course, when it comes to politics, the Guardian has no qualms whatsoever about pushing uninformed celebrity opinions in your face - as long as they&#039;re of the far left. 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2007/nov/04/seanpenn.madonna

Oh, the hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, when it comes to politics, the Guardian has no qualms whatsoever about pushing uninformed celebrity opinions in your face &#8211; as long as they&#8217;re of the far left. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2007/nov/04/seanpenn.madonna" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2007/nov/04/seanpenn.madonna</a></p>
<p>Oh, the hypocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad&#8217;s Reader &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Link Love 4/24</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-184834</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad&#8217;s Reader &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Friday Link Love 4/24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-184834</guid>
		<description>[...] Celebrity engorgements [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Celebrity engorgements [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don't Listen to Jenny McCarthy &#124; Cracked.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-183750</link>
		<dc:creator>Don't Listen to Jenny McCarthy &#124; Cracked.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-183750</guid>
		<description>[...] the public than the things that doctors say. It&#8217;s awful, but it&#8217;s true. According to Science, we do this because &#8220;evolutionary pressures acting on a tribal group of protohumans instilled [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the public than the things that doctors say. It&#8217;s awful, but it&#8217;s true. According to Science, we do this because &#8220;evolutionary pressures acting on a tribal group of protohumans instilled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175584</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175584</guid>
		<description>&quot;OK, I hate rhetorical questions, and we know the answer anyway: evolutionary pressures acting on a tribal group of protohumans instilled in us an instinctive need to listen to authority figures, and that’s been short-circuited in our recently-developed upper brains which causes us to reverse the authority-is-famous connection to be famous-is-authority.&quot;

I think you&#039;d have some trouble running that by any competent Paleoanthropologist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;OK, I hate rhetorical questions, and we know the answer anyway: evolutionary pressures acting on a tribal group of protohumans instilled in us an instinctive need to listen to authority figures, and that’s been short-circuited in our recently-developed upper brains which causes us to reverse the authority-is-famous connection to be famous-is-authority.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;d have some trouble running that by any competent Paleoanthropologist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175541</link>
		<dc:creator>another mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175541</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hunter-gatherer societies don’t have “authority figures” in the same sense that complex societies like ours do.&lt;/i&gt;

There would certainly have been a peer leader, or a tribesman with advanced skills that all the other apes looked up to. What about that great hunter warrior in the tribe who brings home a whole mammoth single-handedly? The one who all the babies look like him and all the other men want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hunter-gatherer societies don’t have “authority figures” in the same sense that complex societies like ours do.</i></p>
<p>There would certainly have been a peer leader, or a tribesman with advanced skills that all the other apes looked up to. What about that great hunter warrior in the tribe who brings home a whole mammoth single-handedly? The one who all the babies look like him and all the other men want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175512</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175512</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;evolutionary pressures acting on a tribal group of protohumans instilled in us an instinctive need to listen to authority figures, and that’s been short-circuited in our recently-developed upper brains which causes us to reverse the authority-is-famous connection to be famous-is-authority.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This may not be entirely true.  Hunter-gatherer societies don&#039;t have &quot;authority figures&quot; in the same sense that complex societies like ours do.

A better explanation might be that we evolved a capacity to learn, a capacity to imitate, and a tendency to conform.  More importantly, we tend to imitate things that appear to &lt;i&gt;work&lt;/i&gt;.  Since celebrities are rich and successful, there might be a stronger psychological urge to listen to them and imitate them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>evolutionary pressures acting on a tribal group of protohumans instilled in us an instinctive need to listen to authority figures, and that’s been short-circuited in our recently-developed upper brains which causes us to reverse the authority-is-famous connection to be famous-is-authority.</p></blockquote>
<p>This may not be entirely true.  Hunter-gatherer societies don&#8217;t have &#8220;authority figures&#8221; in the same sense that complex societies like ours do.</p>
<p>A better explanation might be that we evolved a capacity to learn, a capacity to imitate, and a tendency to conform.  More importantly, we tend to imitate things that appear to <i>work</i>.  Since celebrities are rich and successful, there might be a stronger psychological urge to listen to them and imitate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175438</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175438</guid>
		<description>&quot;William Shatner reserves his own hotel rooms?&quot;

And how do you know he doesn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;William Shatner reserves his own hotel rooms?&#8221;</p>
<p>And how do you know he doesn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragonet2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175396</link>
		<dc:creator>dragonet2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175396</guid>
		<description>I have a very dear friend (pretty much a brother to me) who is a physical chemist.  

It is not pretty for the person who claims that they only eat &#039;organic&#039; foods in front of him.

The start of it is that some of the most toxic chemicals we use are basically &#039;organic&#039;.  The rant goes on from there but I don&#039;t remember a lot of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a very dear friend (pretty much a brother to me) who is a physical chemist.  </p>
<p>It is not pretty for the person who claims that they only eat &#8216;organic&#8217; foods in front of him.</p>
<p>The start of it is that some of the most toxic chemicals we use are basically &#8216;organic&#8217;.  The rant goes on from there but I don&#8217;t remember a lot of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lester</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175370</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175370</guid>
		<description>Well, maybe Shatner doesn&#039;t book his own hotel rooms, but probably his assistant uses Priceline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe Shatner doesn&#8217;t book his own hotel rooms, but probably his assistant uses Priceline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175318</link>
		<dc:creator>Zar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175318</guid>
		<description>&quot;Biological foods&quot;?  Is there any other kind of food?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Biological foods&#8221;?  Is there any other kind of food?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Keller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175284</link>
		<dc:creator>John Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175284</guid>
		<description>Phil,

You forgot to mention Oprah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>You forgot to mention Oprah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175282</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175282</guid>
		<description>One major difference between Phil and most celebrities is,,,he gives references,,,

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One major difference between Phil and most celebrities is,,,he gives references,,,</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175272</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175272</guid>
		<description>&gt; I hope that a lot of people watch that video (and the one made by actress and mom Amanda Peet).

Ahem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> I hope that a lot of people watch that video (and the one made by actress and mom Amanda Peet).</p>
<p>Ahem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Horn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175259</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Horn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175259</guid>
		<description>Someone beat me to it, but I just wanted to echo the sentiment that at least Amanda Peet is speaking out against this crazy celebrity woo-speak, and saying that people should listen to scientists, not them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone beat me to it, but I just wanted to echo the sentiment that at least Amanda Peet is speaking out against this crazy celebrity woo-speak, and saying that people should listen to scientists, not them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina Viering</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175242</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina Viering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175242</guid>
		<description>Everyone seems to want to be famous and if they aren&#039;t on youtube, they live through the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone seems to want to be famous and if they aren&#8217;t on youtube, they live through the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csrster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175230</link>
		<dc:creator>csrster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175230</guid>
		<description>I pusdhe submit too quickly on that comment because I should also have said that the same broadcast features biologist and skeptic Lewis Wolpert talking about the subtleties of cell biology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pusdhe submit too quickly on that comment because I should also have said that the same broadcast features biologist and skeptic Lewis Wolpert talking about the subtleties of cell biology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csrster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175229</link>
		<dc:creator>csrster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175229</guid>
		<description>I read the first paragraph of this post and was about to respond &quot;You should read Marina Hyde&quot;. It&#039;s a good thing I read on.

She has a whole book out about this celebrity culture nonsense and you can hear her pushing it quite amusingly on the BBC&#039;s Start The Week  at http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00jh4f5 .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the first paragraph of this post and was about to respond &#8220;You should read Marina Hyde&#8221;. It&#8217;s a good thing I read on.</p>
<p>She has a whole book out about this celebrity culture nonsense and you can hear her pushing it quite amusingly on the BBC&#8217;s Start The Week  at <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00jh4f5" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00jh4f5</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175215</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175215</guid>
		<description>NO - Bill Shatner singing &quot;Tambourine Man&quot; - It&#039;s like listening to the sound of burgeoning insanity as it crests and washes over you.  And I think it&#039;s where he got his practice for &quot;KHAAAAN!&quot; in Star Trek II.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0hTtsqiFCc

The celebrity endorsement: it&#039;s a bait-and-switch.  An argument from authority from a non-authority.  They did something to be noteworthy, ergo it translates across to everything they do.  Kind of like statements we often hear prefixed with &quot;As an Electrical Engineer with fourteen years experience, I can tell you that blonde women are prettier.&quot; A non-relevant element held up to support an opinion with a shaky opinion-based pedigree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO &#8211; Bill Shatner singing &#8220;Tambourine Man&#8221; &#8211; It&#8217;s like listening to the sound of burgeoning insanity as it crests and washes over you.  And I think it&#8217;s where he got his practice for &#8220;KHAAAAN!&#8221; in Star Trek II.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0hTtsqiFCc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0hTtsqiFCc</a></p>
<p>The celebrity endorsement: it&#8217;s a bait-and-switch.  An argument from authority from a non-authority.  They did something to be noteworthy, ergo it translates across to everything they do.  Kind of like statements we often hear prefixed with &#8220;As an Electrical Engineer with fourteen years experience, I can tell you that blonde women are prettier.&#8221; A non-relevant element held up to support an opinion with a shaky opinion-based pedigree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sundance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175212</link>
		<dc:creator>Sundance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175212</guid>
		<description>I heartily agree with Cleon, it&#039;s the content of a statement or argument that matters. A fool can say whatever they like, but their foolishness doesn&#039;t necessarily make it untrue. What matters is getting people to understand that a statement is not necessarily true, just because a self-proclaimed expert says it is. Which brings us to an interesting article the Hive Overmind ran a few weeks ago...

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/03/26/expert-but-bad-financial-advice-turns-off-decision-making-in-the-brain/

It seems that being told something by an &#039;expert&quot; actually shuts down activity in the 
anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, where decisions are made and probabilities are calculated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heartily agree with Cleon, it&#8217;s the content of a statement or argument that matters. A fool can say whatever they like, but their foolishness doesn&#8217;t necessarily make it untrue. What matters is getting people to understand that a statement is not necessarily true, just because a self-proclaimed expert says it is. Which brings us to an interesting article the Hive Overmind ran a few weeks ago&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/03/26/expert-but-bad-financial-advice-turns-off-decision-making-in-the-brain/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/03/26/expert-but-bad-financial-advice-turns-off-decision-making-in-the-brain/</a></p>
<p>It seems that being told something by an &#8216;expert&#8221; actually shuts down activity in the<br />
anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, where decisions are made and probabilities are calculated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175209</link>
		<dc:creator>PJE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175209</guid>
		<description>Phil....like it or not, to various people, you are a bit of celebrity!

Pete

On an unrelated note, I watched three episodes of firefly tonight...just thought I&#039;d let you know :)

Pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil&#8230;.like it or not, to various people, you are a bit of celebrity!</p>
<p>Pete</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, I watched three episodes of firefly tonight&#8230;just thought I&#8217;d let you know <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gss_000</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175207</link>
		<dc:creator>gss_000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175207</guid>
		<description>So, if we take this to the next step, a well known astronomer shouldn&#039;t use his authority to write  blog posts about politics and religion because that is not his area of expertise?  Or maybe every blog should shut down because most of them are not written by experts?  :)

That&#039;s silly, but it is essentially what we&#039;re saying here.  I find it funny that this seems to apply only to actors, but never to people in other fields.  Like somehow by choosing a profession in the arts you&#039;ve lost your right to speak your mind and hold opinions on a host of matters.  This is why Cleon has it right.  Listen to the message and forget about just attacking the messenger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if we take this to the next step, a well known astronomer shouldn&#8217;t use his authority to write  blog posts about politics and religion because that is not his area of expertise?  Or maybe every blog should shut down because most of them are not written by experts?  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That&#8217;s silly, but it is essentially what we&#8217;re saying here.  I find it funny that this seems to apply only to actors, but never to people in other fields.  Like somehow by choosing a profession in the arts you&#8217;ve lost your right to speak your mind and hold opinions on a host of matters.  This is why Cleon has it right.  Listen to the message and forget about just attacking the messenger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadScientist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175189</link>
		<dc:creator>MadScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175189</guid>
		<description>Kabala water?  I think I&#039;d rather have Moo Pee (and if I mumble it people might even think I&#039;m saying &quot;Snoopy&quot;).

Eat biological foods? Hey! It sounds great to me - in fact that&#039;s my only recommended cure for starvation - eat biological foods.  Yes Gwyneth, eating mud and other non-biological foods is a mental disorder; it even has a name: pica.  [OT] I must admit that while most people love organic food, I have a special interest in non-organic food.   My favorite is a carving of a cloven head of Chinese cabbage produced from a single block of jade.  Unfortunately I can&#039;t find any links to it on the web.  Needless to say, you can&#039;t eat inorganic food - you can&#039;t even eat all organic food - paraffin fruits taste awful.

Fantastic article - I wish we&#039;d see more like it ridiculing the blonde leading the blonde.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kabala water?  I think I&#8217;d rather have Moo Pee (and if I mumble it people might even think I&#8217;m saying &#8220;Snoopy&#8221;).</p>
<p>Eat biological foods? Hey! It sounds great to me &#8211; in fact that&#8217;s my only recommended cure for starvation &#8211; eat biological foods.  Yes Gwyneth, eating mud and other non-biological foods is a mental disorder; it even has a name: pica.  [OT] I must admit that while most people love organic food, I have a special interest in non-organic food.   My favorite is a carving of a cloven head of Chinese cabbage produced from a single block of jade.  Unfortunately I can&#8217;t find any links to it on the web.  Needless to say, you can&#8217;t eat inorganic food &#8211; you can&#8217;t even eat all organic food &#8211; paraffin fruits taste awful.</p>
<p>Fantastic article &#8211; I wish we&#8217;d see more like it ridiculing the blonde leading the blonde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolstar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175186</link>
		<dc:creator>coolstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175186</guid>
		<description>Cleon has it exactly right when he says:
&quot;It’s the content of the arguments that should be addressed, not the fact that they came from “celebrities.”  That&#039;s true, of course, whether the statement in question is from a &quot;celebrity&quot; or a &quot;scientist&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cleon has it exactly right when he says:<br />
&#8220;It’s the content of the arguments that should be addressed, not the fact that they came from “celebrities.”  That&#8217;s true, of course, whether the statement in question is from a &#8220;celebrity&#8221; or a &#8220;scientist&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick nick bobick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175172</link>
		<dc:creator>nick nick bobick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175172</guid>
		<description>And damn!  Aren&#039;t petrochemicals just about as organic as one can get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And damn!  Aren&#8217;t petrochemicals just about as organic as one can get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjörn Larsson, OM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/comment-page-1/#comment-175170</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjörn Larsson, OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/17/celebrity-engorgements/#comment-175170</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
he same Kurzweil that’s cheering for the Geek Rapture
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Eh, isn&#039;t that the guy who claims that exponential trend curves [insert non-mathematical magic here] gives singularities?! Is that a mistake a geek is likely to make?

I propose we name it Freak Rapture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
he same Kurzweil that’s cheering for the Geek Rapture
</p></blockquote>
<p>Eh, isn&#8217;t that the guy who claims that exponential trend curves [insert non-mathematical magic here] gives singularities?! Is that a mistake a geek is likely to make?</p>
<p>I propose we name it Freak Rapture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 17:24:25 -->
