<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Saturn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy from Boulder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-179622</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy from Boulder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 08:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-179622</guid>
		<description>Both BNO (Breaking News) and the Globe website have reports about the imminent shutdown of the Boston Globe:

From Twitter: &quot;Washington Post: After negotiations fail in the last hours, The New York Times Co. readies plans to close the Boston Globe in 60 days.&quot;

Hope &quot;The Big Picture&quot; finds a new home!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both BNO (Breaking News) and the Globe website have reports about the imminent shutdown of the Boston Globe:</p>
<p>From Twitter: &#8220;Washington Post: After negotiations fail in the last hours, The New York Times Co. readies plans to close the Boston Globe in 60 days.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hope &#8220;The Big Picture&#8221; finds a new home!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Phillips, FCD</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176520</link>
		<dc:creator>John Phillips, FCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176520</guid>
		<description>WOW, breathtaking indeed, thanks Phil. I never tire of looking at the Saturn photo gallery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, breathtaking indeed, thanks Phil. I never tire of looking at the Saturn photo gallery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Weiss</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176355</link>
		<dc:creator>John Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176355</guid>
		<description>Glad to help.  We probably *should* consider upgrading our search options to make things easier to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to help.  We probably *should* consider upgrading our search options to make things easier to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176303</link>
		<dc:creator>jf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176303</guid>
		<description>@John Weiss

TNX!

I looked only for the May 2007 pics at Ciclops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John Weiss</p>
<p>TNX!</p>
<p>I looked only for the May 2007 pics at Ciclops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Weiss</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176249</link>
		<dc:creator>John Weiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176249</guid>
		<description>DavidHW and jf: How about the original source of that image (as well as almost all of the rest):
http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=3192

CJ Sevilla, Simon Richard Clarkstone:
Simon pretty much nailed it, although ringshine can&#039;t light the anti-Saturn hemisphere so to the extent that there is illumination there, it would need to come from another source, like reflected light from a moon.
  http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=5309</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DavidHW and jf: How about the original source of that image (as well as almost all of the rest):<br />
<a href="http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=3192" rel="nofollow">http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=3192</a></p>
<p>CJ Sevilla, Simon Richard Clarkstone:<br />
Simon pretty much nailed it, although ringshine can&#8217;t light the anti-Saturn hemisphere so to the extent that there is illumination there, it would need to come from another source, like reflected light from a moon.<br />
  <a href="http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=5309" rel="nofollow">http://ciclops.org/view.php?id=5309</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Got them low-down, no-good, post-ballistics-tests blues. &#171; Communion Of Dreams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176240</link>
		<dc:creator>Got them low-down, no-good, post-ballistics-tests blues. &#171; Communion Of Dreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176240</guid>
		<description>[...] Phil Plait.)  0 Comments   No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phil Plait.)  0 Comments   No Comments so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Richard Clarkstone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176223</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Richard Clarkstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176223</guid>
		<description>@CJ Sevilla:
Enceladus is actually very dim in that photo.  Not only is it much further from the Sun than Earth and Luna are, it was also in eclipse at the time.  To capture that image, the camera would need to be set to a sensitivity that would also capture the stars in the background.

I guess what direction lighting there is comes from the rings.  Notice how the unlit side is not that much dimmer than the lit side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CJ Sevilla:<br />
Enceladus is actually very dim in that photo.  Not only is it much further from the Sun than Earth and Luna are, it was also in eclipse at the time.  To capture that image, the camera would need to be set to a sensitivity that would also capture the stars in the background.</p>
<p>I guess what direction lighting there is comes from the rings.  Notice how the unlit side is not that much dimmer than the lit side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csrster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176199</link>
		<dc:creator>csrster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176199</guid>
		<description>kunigget: yes, but in 1972 we thought Saturn had five rings - very pretty, but a bit featureless. Even Pioneer 11 didn&#039;t change that much. Voyager was a real mind-blower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kunigget: yes, but in 1972 we thought Saturn had five rings &#8211; very pretty, but a bit featureless. Even Pioneer 11 didn&#8217;t change that much. Voyager was a real mind-blower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176182</link>
		<dc:creator>Murff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176182</guid>
		<description>The one where Mimas is just hanging there and you see Saturn&#039;s edge in the background was remarkable.  Great for a background image :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one where Mimas is just hanging there and you see Saturn&#8217;s edge in the background was remarkable.  Great for a background image <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ Sevilla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176178</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ Sevilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176178</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain to me picture 10? I&#039;m naive about the space photos, but from what little I understand of the moon photos, it&#039;s that the stars in the sky were too dim to be exposed  along with the surface. The fact I can see the stars and the moon in picture 10 is confusing to me, and I would love for someone to explain to me why I can see both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain to me picture 10? I&#8217;m naive about the space photos, but from what little I understand of the moon photos, it&#8217;s that the stars in the sky were too dim to be exposed  along with the surface. The fact I can see the stars and the moon in picture 10 is confusing to me, and I would love for someone to explain to me why I can see both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syrtis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176172</link>
		<dc:creator>syrtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176172</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Michael L Says:s 

These are incredible! If I understand it right, the natural color images are how we would see the object with our eyes? Why are they grey, and have no color?&lt;/i&gt;

About 2/3 of those pics are in plain black &amp; white - most Cassini images are recorded that way to save memory space on board as the colours usually aren&#039;t scientifically useful. A full colour image requires taking three separate black &amp; whites of the same subject through red, green and blue filters and combining them later to make a &#039;natural colour&#039; image. 

Ironically, a lot of things in the Saturn system are made up of mostly ice and are coloured grey anyway - pretty much only Saturn itself and Titan have attractive enough hues to make a 3-layer exposure worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Michael L Says:s </p>
<p>These are incredible! If I understand it right, the natural color images are how we would see the object with our eyes? Why are they grey, and have no color?</i></p>
<p>About 2/3 of those pics are in plain black &#038; white &#8211; most Cassini images are recorded that way to save memory space on board as the colours usually aren&#8217;t scientifically useful. A full colour image requires taking three separate black &#038; whites of the same subject through red, green and blue filters and combining them later to make a &#8216;natural colour&#8217; image. </p>
<p>Ironically, a lot of things in the Saturn system are made up of mostly ice and are coloured grey anyway &#8211; pretty much only Saturn itself and Titan have attractive enough hues to make a 3-layer exposure worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturno visto en grande! &#171; Ungaman&#8217;s Free Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176165</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturno visto en grande! &#171; Ungaman&#8217;s Free Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176165</guid>
		<description>[...] cassini, iapetus, mimas, rings, saturn, saturno, sistema solar trackback  Leyendo el dia de hoy el Blog de Phil Plait, me encontre con el enlace a unas impresionantes imagenes de Saturno tomadas por la Sonda Espacial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cassini, iapetus, mimas, rings, saturn, saturno, sistema solar trackback  Leyendo el dia de hoy el Blog de Phil Plait, me encontre con el enlace a unas impresionantes imagenes de Saturno tomadas por la Sonda Espacial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176164</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176164</guid>
		<description>I thought 9 was the best, just thinking of all that activity on saturn when it looks so tranquil from afar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought 9 was the best, just thinking of all that activity on saturn when it looks so tranquil from afar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176163</link>
		<dc:creator>jf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176163</guid>
		<description>Phil,

it seems you do not like HTML hrefs?

Here is the link for DavidHW without it:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Backlit_Saturn_from_Cassini_Orbiter_2007_May_9.png

And directly from NASA:
http://www.nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/view/search/when/May+9,+2007/?q=+Cassini</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>it seems you do not like HTML hrefs?</p>
<p>Here is the link for DavidHW without it:<br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Backlit_Saturn_from_Cassini_Orbiter_2007_May_9.png" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Backlit_Saturn_from_Cassini_Orbiter_2007_May_9.png</a></p>
<p>And directly from NASA:<br />
<a href="http://www.nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/view/search/when/May+9,+2007/?q=+Cassini" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasaimages.org/luna/servlet/view/search/when/May+9,+2007/?q=+Cassini</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JVannini</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176154</link>
		<dc:creator>JVannini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176154</guid>
		<description>WOW!

@Jesse: the very same picture I like the most.

Is really incredible what is going on in Saturns Atmosphere. It completely changed my perception of that small ringed ball I see through my telescope.

It is extraordinarily incredible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!</p>
<p>@Jesse: the very same picture I like the most.</p>
<p>Is really incredible what is going on in Saturns Atmosphere. It completely changed my perception of that small ringed ball I see through my telescope.</p>
<p>It is extraordinarily incredible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176146</guid>
		<description>Picture number 9 is terrifying, except that it&#039;s Way Over There.  18mi / pixel, and dozens of storms visible.  That&#039;s a lot of energy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picture number 9 is terrifying, except that it&#8217;s Way Over There.  18mi / pixel, and dozens of storms visible.  That&#8217;s a lot of energy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vorn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176144</link>
		<dc:creator>Vorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176144</guid>
		<description>#15 is unreal.  The blurring on Titan makes it look like it&#039;s hundreds of times farther away than it actually is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#15 is unreal.  The blurring on Titan makes it look like it&#8217;s hundreds of times farther away than it actually is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176134</link>
		<dc:creator>jf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176134</guid>
		<description>@DavidHW

Btw. there is no &#039;original&#039;, as &quot;the view combines 45 images&quot;. I just googled for &quot;Cassini May 9 2007&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DavidHW</p>
<p>Btw. there is no &#8216;original&#8217;, as &#8220;the view combines 45 images&#8221;. I just googled for &#8220;Cassini May 9 2007&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176126</link>
		<dc:creator>jf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176126</guid>
		<description>DavidHW wrote:
&gt; Does anyone know the link to the hi-res original of Photo #1?

Here you go:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Backlit_Saturn_from_Cassini_Orbiter_2007_May_9.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Backlit_Saturn_from_Cassini_Orbiter_2007_May_9.png&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DavidHW wrote:<br />
> Does anyone know the link to the hi-res original of Photo #1?</p>
<p>Here you go:<br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Backlit_Saturn_from_Cassini_Orbiter_2007_May_9.png" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7f/Backlit_Saturn_from_Cassini_Orbiter_2007_May_9.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amstrad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176124</link>
		<dc:creator>amstrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176124</guid>
		<description>pic 21:

That&#039;s no moon, that&#039;s a.... wait... nevermind, it&#039;s Mimas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pic 21:</p>
<p>That&#8217;s no moon, that&#8217;s a&#8230;. wait&#8230; nevermind, it&#8217;s Mimas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QUASAR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176112</link>
		<dc:creator>QUASAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176112</guid>
		<description>Nice images!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice images!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176110</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176110</guid>
		<description>Excuse me while I smack my gob.

WOW those are some nice images. We&#039;re lucky to have such a beautiful ring system to study inside our own solar system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me while I smack my gob.</p>
<p>WOW those are some nice images. We&#8217;re lucky to have such a beautiful ring system to study inside our own solar system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhtroy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176106</link>
		<dc:creator>dhtroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176106</guid>
		<description>Remelox Says:

&lt;i&gt;I once took my wife out to a corn field far from town with a big long 8 inch telescope&lt;/i&gt;

This reads like Astronomy p-rn . . . I&#039;m just say&#039;in. 

*:p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remelox Says:</p>
<p><i>I once took my wife out to a corn field far from town with a big long 8 inch telescope</i></p>
<p>This reads like Astronomy p-rn . . . I&#8217;m just say&#8217;in. </p>
<p>*:p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176102</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176102</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s just something about #5 and #10 that strike me as ethereal.  I think #10 is about to become my new desktop wallpaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s just something about #5 and #10 that strike me as ethereal.  I think #10 is about to become my new desktop wallpaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-176100</link>
		<dc:creator>gar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/04/22/big-saturn/#comment-176100</guid>
		<description>Picture #22 is the most amazing f-ing thing I&#039;ve ever seen.  It literally took my breath away.  God, I love Cassini.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picture #22 is the most amazing f-ing thing I&#8217;ve ever seen.  It literally took my breath away.  God, I love Cassini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 21:34:39 -->
