Comments on: Trekkies bash new film as ‘fun, watchable’

By: Kurt_eh

Kurt_eh — Fri, 08 May 2009 15:36:32 +0000

Anyone see the new “viral” Burger King website?

High-Larryous!

Now admit it, who hasn’t wanted to do that to the burger King? (Purely in self-defence, of course)

ansuzmannaz — Fri, 08 May 2009 06:42:13 +0000

Woah! A civil conversation about the new “Star Trek” movie! Who’d have thought of *that*?

You guys should see the startrek.com boards. You can’t have a doubt about Abrams or the film without some trekker there to rip you apart!

Jack Hagerty — Fri, 08 May 2009 03:33:49 +0000

Petrolonfire Says: “@ darth _ borehd :

Enterprise? *Shudder* You mean worst there don’t you?”

I think he meant “troll.”

- Jack

Jack Hagerty — Fri, 08 May 2009 03:18:34 +0000

StevoRaine Says: “I agree with the Bad Astronomer. 48 years is not a big (round number)…”

It is in base 2, base 4, base 6, base 8, base 12, base 16 and base 24.

- Jack

Jack Hagerty — Fri, 08 May 2009 03:15:34 +0000

StevoRaine Says: “The old Kirk Vs the “Gorn” (T-Rex headed thingy) footage was real.”

Actually, it was an Allosaurus headed thingy.

- Jack

Jack Hagerty — Fri, 08 May 2009 03:13:48 +0000

Ray Says: How did they overcome the fact that Chekov was like 6 years old when Kirk was in the Academy?”

The same way they got around Spock being some 40 years older. They ignored it.

- Jack

Winter Solstice Man — Thu, 07 May 2009 16:07:30 +0000

Whenever I think of Star Trek anymore I always think of Galaxy Quest.

We shall see how much substance is in this new film, as opposed to the flash we’re being shown in the previews.

Live long and … ah, you know the rest.