Comments on: Creationist (heh) Astronomy (HAHAHAHAHAhahahaha)

By: DavidM

DavidM — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:47:09 +0000

This whole post regarding Spike Psarris’ material is purely ad hominem. It’s nothing more than a childish rant. And yet ironically, it sent loads of traffic to the criticized site. Now, years later, it continues to.

By: Creationists still can’t seem to evolve | Bad Astronomy

Creationists still can’t seem to evolve | Bad Astronomy — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:37:53 +0000

[...] http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=1695 [3]: http://kgov.com/bel/20101008 [4]: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/05/22/creationist-heh-astronomy-hahahahahahahaha… [5]: http://www.creationastronomy.com/evolution-has-nothing-to-do-with-astronomy/ [6]: [...]

By: Stripe

Stripe — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:09:47 +0000

:mock: Atheists.

By: TJ He

TJ He — Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:02:16 +0000

Liars abound in this debate; but it’s not the creationist who is lying. Check out the creationist’s response at http://www.creationastronomy.com/evolution-has-nothing-to-do-with-astronomy/

As to Phil Plait, you are a liar. The proof is your own words abuot stellar evolution at http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/movies/superman_returns_review.html and your own words above (BTW, these are your words on your blog page, correctly quoted).

Hypocrite evolutionist loser. Time to change, Phil Plait.

By: mcfunthomas

mcfunthomas — Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:18:27 +0000

Whenever I read atheists writing about Xtian God I find their statements as if of morons with IQ < 50. They laugh at creationists n say creationists know little about science (some realy does, I admit). Yet, a significant number of atheists (though not only them) show the same (or lower) level of knowledge when commenting about the Bible, Xtianity and alike… they're just stupid ignorants.

By: Calypsis4

Calypsis4 — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:41:03 +0000

I am an ex-evolutionist and I agree with Spike Psarris on astronomy. Evolution simply doesn’t have the facts to support any kind of theory of old age for the universe. Psarris work on the solar system is superb and the stupid answers supposedly ‘refuting’ him are just that: stupid.

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:19:12 +0000

Read more Hovind.
The universe was created in a BigBang, then chemical evolution happened, stellar evolution, planetary evolution and lastly biological evolution. Probably cars and toasters also evolved over time. You need to stay up to date with the latest in Creation science Thats because evolution just means ‘change over time’ and is mostly religion and not science.

The Grand Canyon was both laid down during the Noahic flood , and then carved from the deposited sediment a bit later. Apparently the sediment blocked the path for water to drain , and some big lake formed when the flood receded. The lake then broke through and carved the canyon.

By: Na

Na — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:01:12 +0000

Evidently K-man, you are not familiar with either sarcasm nor Naked Bunny’s POV on the matter.

By: K-man

K-man — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:52:32 +0000

“Naked Bunny with a Whip Says:
May 22nd, 2009 at 6:28 am

would carve the Grand Canyon in just days

That’s disingenuous of you, Phil. Everyone knows it took the Flood months to carve out the Grand Canyon, not days. That’s totally reasonable.”

Not going to lie, probably one of the stupidest things i have ever read. are you 5, or just brain dead? Judging by flow and deterioration of the cliff by volume of water per second, archeologists believe it took the colorado river more than 6 million years to carve THE WORLDS LARGEST CANYON! wow. please just give up in life.
peace

By: Geoff

Geoff — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:52:26 +0000

I’m not siding with the creator of the video, but he did clearly state in the first video that when he used the word “Evolution” he was talking about planetary evolution, not biological evolution. I’m just saying…

My whole issue with what I saw is that, even though science doesn’t know the answers to all the questions and conundrums he proposes, and it may not fit with the current model… the beauty of science is that it’s ideas can be molded to better fit the outcome of experiments and observations. We may not know the answers now, but I can guarantee that we will.