Comments on: The evolution of creationist astronomy

By: Tim Ballentine

Tim Ballentine — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:39:33 +0000

I am a Christian and everytime I debate evolutionists,they don’t stick to the topic and they continue to make strawman arguments,throw out red herrings,and use insulting names against me.So as your article has expressed,I must be winning the debate for Creation.I always thought that I was,now you have confirmed it for me.Thanks.

By: Ian’s Creation Blog & Newsletters » Blog Archive » June 18, 2009 CrEvo newsletter

Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:52:28 +0000

[...] You’ll recall in my last newsletter that Spike’s awesome video “What you aren’t being told about astronomy: Volume I” had gotten attacked on PZ Myer’s Pharyngula blog, as well as Discover magazine’s “Bad astronomy” blog. Then Spike responded on his own blog, which I reported here. Then the “Bad astronomy” dude (Phil Plait) wrote a pretty pathetic rebuttal. [...]

By: keith

keith — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 07:46:17 +0000

All of you forgot something, actually because you overestimate yourself and you are stuck in your own theory of science. Take one step back and see, if God created the world, and could alter the mindsets of living beings, create things out of nothing etc. what about the basic rules and laws governing this whole space?
If we take this space, the entire universe, as what we are living in, what about God? I realize that if I say things as such, I will be breaking the rules of science, but what is science? Is it something that controls things the way for it to become, or is it something that can be controlled?
The phrase in the bible “let there be light” said by God, what does this light mean? Why must the Sun be added in after that? Don’t you think that the Israelites in the past would have noticed that?
Anyway, back to your theory of evolution, but I’ll just ask these questions. What is space? How did it become so? What is light? What is time? Why do rules exist in space?

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:43:21 +0000

Here’s a good laugh!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rov3pV9PsRI&feature=player_embedded

Ha Ha Ha.

By: Darth Robo

Darth Robo — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:32:53 +0000

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dating.html

Next thing we know, telson will be telling us Piltdown was a fake…

By: telson

telson — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:34:59 +0000

http://koti.phnet.fi/elohim/theageoftheearth3.html

When it comes to determining the age of something, radioactive measurements are regarded as one of the most important methods. With these measurements, attempts to calculate both the age of the Earth and the age of animals and humans on the Earth have been made, and these methods have usually given the age as millions of years, especially when it is a question of rock types and elements. The measuring principle is based on radioactive materials generally having a certain time in which they change and decompose into other elements. For example, the basic idea of uranium/lead dating is that uranium should change entirely into lead always with the same speed and over a certain time.

The fact is, however, that these methods are unreliable. By them, one can indeed measure the contents in stones and samples but it is another thing whether or not they have anything to do with the age. This is because in the measurements there are suppositions, which are impossible to prove afterwards scientifically.

By: Darth Robo

Darth Robo — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:00:52 +0000

God have mercy on your soul, Elf4God.