<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here comes the Sun(spot)!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:36:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sun Spot Problem Finally Solved &#124; Disinformation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/comment-page-1/#comment-215983</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun Spot Problem Finally Solved &#124; Disinformation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/#comment-215983</guid>
		<description>[...] GO TO FULL STORY [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GO TO FULL STORY [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/comment-page-1/#comment-206704</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/#comment-206704</guid>
		<description>August 16 2009   36 days running no sunspots !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>August 16 2009   36 days running no sunspots !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun, Sun, Sun &#8230; here it comes &#8211; NOT &#171; Greenfyre&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/comment-page-1/#comment-201316</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun, Sun, Sun &#8230; here it comes &#8211; NOT &#171; Greenfyre&#8217;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/#comment-201316</guid>
		<description>[...] Here comes the Sun(spot)! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here comes the Sun(spot)! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/comment-page-1/#comment-195286</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/#comment-195286</guid>
		<description>An interesting bit of work, but I don&#039;t understand how a one year delay in this sub-surface movement has produced a three year delay in the start of the cycle. In 2006, the main-stream prediction was for a year&#039;s delay, but a very energetic cycle. Cycle 24 has finally started, but it certainly doesn&#039;t look energetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting bit of work, but I don&#8217;t understand how a one year delay in this sub-surface movement has produced a three year delay in the start of the cycle. In 2006, the main-stream prediction was for a year&#8217;s delay, but a very energetic cycle. Cycle 24 has finally started, but it certainly doesn&#8217;t look energetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/comment-page-1/#comment-194940</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/#comment-194940</guid>
		<description>RE: KC Says -- paraphrasing that remark that &#039;this wasn&#039;t a NASA press release&#039; ... NASA might not have done the work, but, it DID sponsor the work &amp; did provide the press release; the NASA press release for this is at:  

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/17jun_jetstream.htm?list1065474

Also, Stanford&#039;s Dr. Leif Svaalgard (an eminently qualified &#039;solar scientist&#039;) addressed this specific press release, and he didn&#039;t mince words, at (scroll down or search to the first &quot;Leif&quot; reference):  

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/17/solar-cycle-24-lack-of-sunspots-caused-by-sluggish-solar-jet-stream-returning-soon/#more-8598

He comments regularly at that site to inject some objective science -- and deserves credit for restricting his comments to the subject for which he&#039;s most qualified.  

I just wished our &quot;Bad Astronomer&quot; picked up on what that release was really about and gave it the proper credit due, and no more....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: KC Says &#8212; paraphrasing that remark that &#8216;this wasn&#8217;t a NASA press release&#8217; &#8230; NASA might not have done the work, but, it DID sponsor the work &#038; did provide the press release; the NASA press release for this is at:  </p>
<p><a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/17jun_jetstream.htm?list1065474" rel="nofollow">http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/17jun_jetstream.htm?list1065474</a></p>
<p>Also, Stanford&#8217;s Dr. Leif Svaalgard (an eminently qualified &#8217;solar scientist&#8217;) addressed this specific press release, and he didn&#8217;t mince words, at (scroll down or search to the first &#8220;Leif&#8221; reference):  </p>
<p><a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/17/solar-cycle-24-lack-of-sunspots-caused-by-sluggish-solar-jet-stream-returning-soon/#more-8598" rel="nofollow">http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/17/solar-cycle-24-lack-of-sunspots-caused-by-sluggish-solar-jet-stream-returning-soon/#more-8598</a></p>
<p>He comments regularly at that site to inject some objective science &#8212; and deserves credit for restricting his comments to the subject for which he&#8217;s most qualified.  </p>
<p>I just wished our &#8220;Bad Astronomer&#8221; picked up on what that release was really about and gave it the proper credit due, and no more&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here comes the Sun(spot)! &#124; Acne Spot Gel - Health and Beauty Products</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/comment-page-1/#comment-194626</link>
		<dc:creator>Here comes the Sun(spot)! &#124; Acne Spot Gel - Health and Beauty Products</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/#comment-194626</guid>
		<description>[...] all due respect to article:  link Tags: detection, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all due respect to article:  link Tags: detection, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustPassingThru</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/comment-page-1/#comment-194150</link>
		<dc:creator>JustPassingThru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/06/17/here-comes-the-sunspot/#comment-194150</guid>
		<description>nevermind</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nevermind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
