Skeptically Speaking online

By Phil Plait | June 22, 2009 1:00 pm

The interview I did with the folks at Skeptically Speaking is now online on their website. Funny– while I was on, it seemed like I was just babbling, but listening to it now I seemed lucid enough.

We talked about the JREF, the Million Dollar Challenge, NASA, Star Trek, and then I had to field a bunch of much tougher questions from the audience than usual. Hopefully that part made some modicum of sense. Well, either way, I had a lot of fun!

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Antiscience, Astronomy, JREF, Skepticism

Comments (7)

  1. IVAN3MAN

    Phil Plait:

    … and then I had to field a bunch of much tougher questions from the audience then usual.

    Err… Phil, that should be than, not “then”. ;-)

  2. @IVAN3MAN

    Maybe he meant “much tougher questions from the audience, then [the] usual [stuff]“?

  3. IVAN3MAN

    @ Todd W.,

    Like, er… “… much tougher questions from the audience, then [the] usual [stuff from creationists and 'Electric Universe' nutters got on my tits!]” :P

  4. Phil, It’s the wonderful quality of your “babble” to convey so much understandable information and excitement about your subject that we love so much. Keep on babbling!

    I listened in while you were on the air and was really impressed with how cool headed you stayed. Each new “big” question I thought, “he will never manage to explain this on the air” and you proved me wrong again and again. I learned a lot.

    The live podcast crapped out about 2/3 of the way through for me so I will have to go listen to the rest. *and FYI to Skeptically Speaking the volume of everybody really was too low on the internet broadcast.

  5. Gary Ansorge

    Yeah, babbling is always a problem when you’re excited and passionate about your subject. I just try to remember to “Breath, Idiot, Breath,,,”,,,sometimes that will slow me down just enough,,,

    GAry 7

  6. Dave Wiley

    The difference between babbling and lucidity is called editing.

  7. Hi Phil,

    Hopefully this is a good place to take issue with something you said on the show.

    I haven’t seen the recent Star Trek, for which I am shameful, but you described diving from a spaceship hundreds of kilometers up. Then you said heating would not be an issue. As a spacecraft developer I have to take exception. The rule of thumb for heating is that a capsule falling straight down from 300km sees the same peak heating rate as an orbital capsule reentering the atmosphere and a fall from 500km sees the same peak heating rate as an Apollo capsule returning from the Moon.

    You could posit materials and thermal management advances in spacesuits, but I don’t think they will ever be good enough to jump from a craft hundreds of kilometers up with just a spacesuit.

    Anyway, just thought I’d let you know, and also other than that technical nit, I thought you did well!

    Dave

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »