<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What must E.T. think of us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:04:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spongebob Squarepants</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-198446</link>
		<dc:creator>Spongebob Squarepants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-198446</guid>
		<description>Like to watch Stargate Atlantis episodes and also Lost. I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like to watch Stargate Atlantis episodes and also Lost. I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-198196</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-198196</guid>
		<description>What would Lrrr say? &quot;I will DESTROY YOU!&quot;, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would Lrrr say? &#8220;I will DESTROY YOU!&#8221;, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WeirdScienceBlog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197569</link>
		<dc:creator>WeirdScienceBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197569</guid>
		<description>For British folk, I&#039;ve come up with a UK version at http://blogs.sundaymercury.net/weirdscience/2009/07/et-watching-uk-tv.html

As I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll want to know who is watching Tiswas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For British folk, I&#8217;ve come up with a UK version at <a href="http://blogs.sundaymercury.net/weirdscience/2009/07/et-watching-uk-tv.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sundaymercury.net/weirdscience/2009/07/et-watching-uk-tv.html</a></p>
<p>As I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll want to know who is watching Tiswas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197540</link>
		<dc:creator>tracer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197540</guid>
		<description>I would just like to note that, since Omicron Persei is a binary consisting of a B1 III and a B3 V orbiting each other EVERY FOUR-AND-A-HALF DAYS, the two are going to be WAY too close together for planets in either of their comfort zones to be orbiting either one of them individually.

However, a planet far enough away to be in the comfort zone of the pair taken collectively COULD be in a stable orbit.  The B1 III is awfully luminous, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just like to note that, since Omicron Persei is a binary consisting of a B1 III and a B3 V orbiting each other EVERY FOUR-AND-A-HALF DAYS, the two are going to be WAY too close together for planets in either of their comfort zones to be orbiting either one of them individually.</p>
<p>However, a planet far enough away to be in the comfort zone of the pair taken collectively COULD be in a stable orbit.  The B1 III is awfully luminous, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spectroscope</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197495</link>
		<dc:creator>Spectroscope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197495</guid>
		<description>@ 59 David Dechel : Aldebaran Vs Alderaan. 

One is  a real star, an orange giant in front of the hyades open star cluster.

The other is a fictional planet looking very similar to Earth that was home to Princess Leia and destroyed by Darth Vader&#039;s Death Star in the original &lt;i&gt;&#039;Star Wars&#039; &lt;/i&gt; movie. 

There is a difference! ;-)

BTW. Aldebarran (or its system) is probably not inhabited because :

a) having probably formed before the sun it may well be relatively metal poor &amp; thus unlikely to host exoplanets. 

b) If OTOH Aldebaran formed after the Sun then to have already evolved to orange gianthood  it would  have to have been much a more massive - and thus shorter lived star. Very likely too short-lived to have allowed enough time for intelligent life to evolve.  

&amp;

b) having swollen to become an orange giant, it will have rendered any hypothetical planet in its old main-sequence stage &quot;habitable zone&quot; way too hot and uninhabitable many millions of years ago. Indeed, this would have happened during Aldebaran&#039;s sub-giant stellar phase when it first left the Hydrogen burning &quot;dwarf star&quot; main-sequence. 

Yes I know you were joking - just thought I&#039;d point that out... ;-) 

Incidentally, the same logic applies to almost all the other giant stars out there - Arcturus, we know, is a very ancient star thus probably metal-poor &amp; planetless, Capella started life as a binary of A or B-type stars each being twice as massive as the Sun or more. Betelegeuse and Antares at 15-20 solar masses are wa-ay too massive  to be considered and so forth. Pollux, OTOH, at 1 and a half or so solar masses and with a known exoplanet in a circular Jupiter-like (590-day) orbit  might be an exception to this rule ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 59 David Dechel : Aldebaran Vs Alderaan. </p>
<p>One is  a real star, an orange giant in front of the hyades open star cluster.</p>
<p>The other is a fictional planet looking very similar to Earth that was home to Princess Leia and destroyed by Darth Vader&#8217;s Death Star in the original <i>&#8216;Star Wars&#8217; </i> movie. </p>
<p>There is a difference! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BTW. Aldebarran (or its system) is probably not inhabited because :</p>
<p>a) having probably formed before the sun it may well be relatively metal poor &#038; thus unlikely to host exoplanets. </p>
<p>b) If OTOH Aldebaran formed after the Sun then to have already evolved to orange gianthood  it would  have to have been much a more massive &#8211; and thus shorter lived star. Very likely too short-lived to have allowed enough time for intelligent life to evolve.  </p>
<p>&#038;</p>
<p>b) having swollen to become an orange giant, it will have rendered any hypothetical planet in its old main-sequence stage &#8220;habitable zone&#8221; way too hot and uninhabitable many millions of years ago. Indeed, this would have happened during Aldebaran&#8217;s sub-giant stellar phase when it first left the Hydrogen burning &#8220;dwarf star&#8221; main-sequence. </p>
<p>Yes I know you were joking &#8211; just thought I&#8217;d point that out&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Incidentally, the same logic applies to almost all the other giant stars out there &#8211; Arcturus, we know, is a very ancient star thus probably metal-poor &#038; planetless, Capella started life as a binary of A or B-type stars each being twice as massive as the Sun or more. Betelegeuse and Antares at 15-20 solar masses are wa-ay too massive  to be considered and so forth. Pollux, OTOH, at 1 and a half or so solar masses and with a known exoplanet in a circular Jupiter-like (590-day) orbit  might be an exception to this rule &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dechel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197037</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dechel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197037</guid>
		<description>I sure hope that the aliens are not on Aldebaran - but is they are, man are they in for a surprise when Star Wars comes along :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope that the aliens are not on Aldebaran &#8211; but is they are, man are they in for a surprise when Star Wars comes along <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197022</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197022</guid>
		<description>@Grumpy
&lt;i&gt;The Sopranos and Spongebob Squarepants are NOT bound for Procyon — because they were distributed via cable, not over the air&lt;/i&gt;
The Sopranos was on free-to-air non-cable network TV here in Oz so they&#039;re bound for somewhere for sure. Not on any regular schedule though so the aliens may have to wait some time for the finale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Grumpy<br />
<i>The Sopranos and Spongebob Squarepants are NOT bound for Procyon — because they were distributed via cable, not over the air</i><br />
The Sopranos was on free-to-air non-cable network TV here in Oz so they&#8217;re bound for somewhere for sure. Not on any regular schedule though so the aliens may have to wait some time for the finale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197005</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197005</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the aliens would be able to distinguish between the factual and fictional programmes. Not necessarily thinking it&#039;s all real like in Galaxy Quest. Maybe they would think WWII was a TV drama? What about movies based on historical events?

@41. Surely the aliens would have their own far-fetched science fiction too.

Then there&#039;s the matter of what they&#039;d think of our &#039;adult films&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the aliens would be able to distinguish between the factual and fictional programmes. Not necessarily thinking it&#8217;s all real like in Galaxy Quest. Maybe they would think WWII was a TV drama? What about movies based on historical events?</p>
<p>@41. Surely the aliens would have their own far-fetched science fiction too.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the matter of what they&#8217;d think of our &#8216;adult films&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horus Kol</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-196909</link>
		<dc:creator>Horus Kol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 07:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196909</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately for us - the earliest and most consistent messages that leaked from earth were the Nazi propaganda of the 1930s - not the best introduction to our society...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately for us &#8211; the earliest and most consistent messages that leaked from earth were the Nazi propaganda of the 1930s &#8211; not the best introduction to our society&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg in Austin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-196890</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg in Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196890</guid>
		<description>@Grumpy,

Are you saying the cable companies don&#039;t transmit their signals via satellites?

wiki.answers.com/Q/How_does_cable_television_work
electronics.howstuffworks.com/cable-tv.htm

Or were you just joking?

8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Grumpy,</p>
<p>Are you saying the cable companies don&#8217;t transmit their signals via satellites?</p>
<p>wiki.answers.com/Q/How_does_cable_television_work<br />
electronics.howstuffworks.com/cable-tv.htm</p>
<p>Or were you just joking?</p>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-196847</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196847</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Sopranos&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Spongebob Squarepants&lt;/i&gt; are NOT bound for Procyon -- because they were distributed via cable, not over the air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Sopranos</i> and <i>Spongebob Squarepants</i> are NOT bound for Procyon &#8212; because they were distributed via cable, not over the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg in Austin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-196837</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg in Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196837</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what Lrrr would (did) say:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Lrrr: This is ancient Earth&#039;s most foolish program. Why does Ross, the largest friend, not simply eat the other five?
Nd-Nd: Perhaps they are saving that for sweeps. &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what Lrrr would (did) say:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Lrrr: This is ancient Earth&#8217;s most foolish program. Why does Ross, the largest friend, not simply eat the other five?<br />
Nd-Nd: Perhaps they are saving that for sweeps. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-196829</link>
		<dc:creator>CMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196829</guid>
		<description>Night Court yes! 
But keep in mind that Data repeatedly appeared there disguised as human Bob Wheeler from Yugoslavia, wreaking havoc on our judicial system. 

Coincidence? 

I think not . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Night Court yes!<br />
But keep in mind that Data repeatedly appeared there disguised as human Bob Wheeler from Yugoslavia, wreaking havoc on our judicial system. </p>
<p>Coincidence? </p>
<p>I think not . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stone Age Scientist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-196803</link>
		<dc:creator>Stone Age Scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196803</guid>
		<description>Sorry, wrong link to Roger Ebert&#039;s blog. Here&#039;s the correct one:

http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/02/ending_up_in_a_kind_of_soundle.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, wrong link to Roger Ebert&#8217;s blog. Here&#8217;s the correct one:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/02/ending_up_in_a_kind_of_soundle.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/02/ending_up_in_a_kind_of_soundle.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stone Age Scientist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196801</link>
		<dc:creator>Stone Age Scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196801</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You can stop wondering. The overwhelming majority of our digital media is so fragile there will be little if anything left to decode...&lt;/i&gt;

Which leads us to the question, where will all this be twenty, fifty years from now? Who will be reading these (digitally-compiled) entries of ours many, many years from now? The august critic Roger Ebert reflected on a similar question in his blog &lt;a href=”http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/02/ending_up_in_a_kind_of_soundle.html” target=”_blank” rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ending up in a kind of soundlessly spinning ethereal void as we all must&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, causing him to write,

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;”The day will come when the words of Shakespeare are no longer known. The day will come, perhaps sooner, when all the words on the internet, in every language, have disappeared. These very words, and all the words we have read and written, will no longer exist. Oh, for a long time they may be on a hard drive somewhere, one able to store the entirety of the web. But not forever. Not even close. A word not read is like the proverbial tree falling in the forest. The word existed, the tree fell, but without witness, what does it mean?”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Personally, I think this is another example of the seemingly dual state of things. In a way, man’s work seems important; but then at the same time, it isn’t. We can only cherish the present; and therefore, thanks, BA and bloggers, for sharing knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You can stop wondering. The overwhelming majority of our digital media is so fragile there will be little if anything left to decode&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Which leads us to the question, where will all this be twenty, fifty years from now? Who will be reading these (digitally-compiled) entries of ours many, many years from now? The august critic Roger Ebert reflected on a similar question in his blog <a href=”http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/02/ending_up_in_a_kind_of_soundle.html” target=”_blank” rel="nofollow"><b>Ending up in a kind of soundlessly spinning ethereal void as we all must</b></a>, causing him to write,</p>
<blockquote><p><i>”The day will come when the words of Shakespeare are no longer known. The day will come, perhaps sooner, when all the words on the internet, in every language, have disappeared. These very words, and all the words we have read and written, will no longer exist. Oh, for a long time they may be on a hard drive somewhere, one able to store the entirety of the web. But not forever. Not even close. A word not read is like the proverbial tree falling in the forest. The word existed, the tree fell, but without witness, what does it mean?”</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Personally, I think this is another example of the seemingly dual state of things. In a way, man’s work seems important; but then at the same time, it isn’t. We can only cherish the present; and therefore, thanks, BA and bloggers, for sharing knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196799</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196799</guid>
		<description>I remember an episode of &quot;Amazing Stories&quot; back in the 80&#039;s where these kids I believe were trying to build their own satellite dish and ended up picking up a TV broadcast from a nearby star system where aliens were doing an imitation of &quot;I Love Lucy&quot;.

@Naked Bunny - You got room for a passenger?  I loved &quot;Night Court&quot; too.

I wonder if the Grey aliens from Zeta Reticuli have planned their first Star Trek convention yet? :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember an episode of &#8220;Amazing Stories&#8221; back in the 80&#8242;s where these kids I believe were trying to build their own satellite dish and ended up picking up a TV broadcast from a nearby star system where aliens were doing an imitation of &#8220;I Love Lucy&#8221;.</p>
<p>@Naked Bunny &#8211; You got room for a passenger?  I loved &#8220;Night Court&#8221; too.</p>
<p>I wonder if the Grey aliens from Zeta Reticuli have planned their first Star Trek convention yet? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196788</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196788</guid>
		<description>It is indeed fortunate for our reputation in the universe that those signals are subject to the inverse square law, making them disappear into the noise within a few parsecs.

It is unfortunate that life on Earth was exposed to those signals. My analog TV has never made more sense than it does now; finally: reality TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed fortunate for our reputation in the universe that those signals are subject to the inverse square law, making them disappear into the noise within a few parsecs.</p>
<p>It is unfortunate that life on Earth was exposed to those signals. My analog TV has never made more sense than it does now; finally: reality TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196771</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196771</guid>
		<description>#27:
Exactly. Where&#039;s Hitler?
He&#039;s our interstellar emissary after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#27:<br />
Exactly. Where&#8217;s Hitler?<br />
He&#8217;s our interstellar emissary after all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBY</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196747</link>
		<dc:creator>IBY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196747</guid>
		<description>You know, I feel sorry to the hypothetical aliens who are hypothetically watching WWII for 6 years. I mean really, it is about people politically maneuvering, maiming, and destroying each other.

@BA
But isn&#039;t the reason we can detect GRBs is because the energy is all concentrated into two bursts instead of spreading out all around? Anyways, how big must the dishes be to detect the signal from the nearest star?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I feel sorry to the hypothetical aliens who are hypothetically watching WWII for 6 years. I mean really, it is about people politically maneuvering, maiming, and destroying each other.</p>
<p>@BA<br />
But isn&#8217;t the reason we can detect GRBs is because the energy is all concentrated into two bursts instead of spreading out all around? Anyways, how big must the dishes be to detect the signal from the nearest star?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WJM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196738</link>
		<dc:creator>WJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196738</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;And of course, if (extraterrestrial) aliens had internet connections, they’d be flooding BA and we would have one hell of an internet congestion.&lt;/I&gt;

They&#039;re still on dial-up. Give it a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And of course, if (extraterrestrial) aliens had internet connections, they’d be flooding BA and we would have one hell of an internet congestion.</i></p>
<p>They&#8217;re still on dial-up. Give it a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Plait</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196735</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Plait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196735</guid>
		<description>Wow, AnonymousToo, it took a lot of guts to say that. 

[rolleyes]

In fact, the radio waves do travel forever, and the Earth&#039;s radio does make it to other stars. It can be detectable, but you&#039;d need a big dish. Power has nothing to do with how far the radio travels, just how weak the signal is. That&#039;s why we can detect radi waves from gamma-ray bursts billions of light years away.

But I guess that&#039;s just me being uninformed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, AnonymousToo, it took a lot of guts to say that. </p>
<p>[rolleyes]</p>
<p>In fact, the radio waves do travel forever, and the Earth&#8217;s radio does make it to other stars. It can be detectable, but you&#8217;d need a big dish. Power has nothing to do with how far the radio travels, just how weak the signal is. That&#8217;s why we can detect radi waves from gamma-ray bursts billions of light years away.</p>
<p>But I guess that&#8217;s just me being uninformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonymousToo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196732</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonymousToo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196732</guid>
		<description>Radio waves do not travel forever in space. They have a limited power to them, and as the sphere increases in size leaving the Earth, the power is scattered too widely across the surface of the sphere and eventually the signal is too weak at any point to be detected. 

Earth&#039;s signals barely make it out of the solar system and go to no other stars. 

The Skeptologists so far are fairly non-scientific and uninformed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radio waves do not travel forever in space. They have a limited power to them, and as the sphere increases in size leaving the Earth, the power is scattered too widely across the surface of the sphere and eventually the signal is too weak at any point to be detected. </p>
<p>Earth&#8217;s signals barely make it out of the solar system and go to no other stars. </p>
<p>The Skeptologists so far are fairly non-scientific and uninformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196726</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196726</guid>
		<description>And if you scroll it up and down really, really fast you get a pretty cool hypnotic thing going with it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you scroll it up and down really, really fast you get a pretty cool hypnotic thing going with it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stone Age Scientist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196718</link>
		<dc:creator>Stone Age Scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196718</guid>
		<description>Not to mention, they&#039;d be rolling on the floor and laughing out loud when they see some of the sci-fi programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention, they&#8217;d be rolling on the floor and laughing out loud when they see some of the sci-fi programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Singels</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-1/#comment-196711</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Singels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-196711</guid>
		<description>I always wondered if it would be possible to pick up a useful signal that far out. I would guess that the signal would degrade to nothing over those kinds of distances.

Phil, could you shed some light on that for us ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wondered if it would be possible to pick up a useful signal that far out. I would guess that the signal would degrade to nothing over those kinds of distances.</p>
<p>Phil, could you shed some light on that for us ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 13:04:10 -->
