<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What must E.T. think of us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:05:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spongebob Squarepants</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-198446</link>
		<dc:creator>Spongebob Squarepants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-198446</guid>
		<description>Like to watch Stargate Atlantis episodes and also Lost. I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like to watch Stargate Atlantis episodes and also Lost. I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-198196</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-198196</guid>
		<description>What would Lrrr say? &quot;I will DESTROY YOU!&quot;, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would Lrrr say? &#8220;I will DESTROY YOU!&#8221;, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WeirdScienceBlog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197569</link>
		<dc:creator>WeirdScienceBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197569</guid>
		<description>For British folk, I&#039;ve come up with a UK version at http://blogs.sundaymercury.net/weirdscience/2009/07/et-watching-uk-tv.html

As I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll want to know who is watching Tiswas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For British folk, I&#8217;ve come up with a UK version at <a href="http://blogs.sundaymercury.net/weirdscience/2009/07/et-watching-uk-tv.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sundaymercury.net/weirdscience/2009/07/et-watching-uk-tv.html</a></p>
<p>As I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll want to know who is watching Tiswas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197540</link>
		<dc:creator>tracer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197540</guid>
		<description>I would just like to note that, since Omicron Persei is a binary consisting of a B1 III and a B3 V orbiting each other EVERY FOUR-AND-A-HALF DAYS, the two are going to be WAY too close together for planets in either of their comfort zones to be orbiting either one of them individually.

However, a planet far enough away to be in the comfort zone of the pair taken collectively COULD be in a stable orbit.  The B1 III is awfully luminous, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just like to note that, since Omicron Persei is a binary consisting of a B1 III and a B3 V orbiting each other EVERY FOUR-AND-A-HALF DAYS, the two are going to be WAY too close together for planets in either of their comfort zones to be orbiting either one of them individually.</p>
<p>However, a planet far enough away to be in the comfort zone of the pair taken collectively COULD be in a stable orbit.  The B1 III is awfully luminous, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spectroscope</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197495</link>
		<dc:creator>Spectroscope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197495</guid>
		<description>@ 59 David Dechel : Aldebaran Vs Alderaan. 

One is  a real star, an orange giant in front of the hyades open star cluster.

The other is a fictional planet looking very similar to Earth that was home to Princess Leia and destroyed by Darth Vader&#039;s Death Star in the original &lt;i&gt;&#039;Star Wars&#039; &lt;/i&gt; movie. 

There is a difference! ;-)

BTW. Aldebarran (or its system) is probably not inhabited because :

a) having probably formed before the sun it may well be relatively metal poor &amp; thus unlikely to host exoplanets. 

b) If OTOH Aldebaran formed after the Sun then to have already evolved to orange gianthood  it would  have to have been much a more massive - and thus shorter lived star. Very likely too short-lived to have allowed enough time for intelligent life to evolve.  

&amp;

b) having swollen to become an orange giant, it will have rendered any hypothetical planet in its old main-sequence stage &quot;habitable zone&quot; way too hot and uninhabitable many millions of years ago. Indeed, this would have happened during Aldebaran&#039;s sub-giant stellar phase when it first left the Hydrogen burning &quot;dwarf star&quot; main-sequence. 

Yes I know you were joking - just thought I&#039;d point that out... ;-) 

Incidentally, the same logic applies to almost all the other giant stars out there - Arcturus, we know, is a very ancient star thus probably metal-poor &amp; planetless, Capella started life as a binary of A or B-type stars each being twice as massive as the Sun or more. Betelegeuse and Antares at 15-20 solar masses are wa-ay too massive  to be considered and so forth. Pollux, OTOH, at 1 and a half or so solar masses and with a known exoplanet in a circular Jupiter-like (590-day) orbit  might be an exception to this rule ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 59 David Dechel : Aldebaran Vs Alderaan. </p>
<p>One is  a real star, an orange giant in front of the hyades open star cluster.</p>
<p>The other is a fictional planet looking very similar to Earth that was home to Princess Leia and destroyed by Darth Vader&#8217;s Death Star in the original <i>&#8216;Star Wars&#8217; </i> movie. </p>
<p>There is a difference! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BTW. Aldebarran (or its system) is probably not inhabited because :</p>
<p>a) having probably formed before the sun it may well be relatively metal poor &#038; thus unlikely to host exoplanets. </p>
<p>b) If OTOH Aldebaran formed after the Sun then to have already evolved to orange gianthood  it would  have to have been much a more massive &#8211; and thus shorter lived star. Very likely too short-lived to have allowed enough time for intelligent life to evolve.  </p>
<p>&#038;</p>
<p>b) having swollen to become an orange giant, it will have rendered any hypothetical planet in its old main-sequence stage &#8220;habitable zone&#8221; way too hot and uninhabitable many millions of years ago. Indeed, this would have happened during Aldebaran&#8217;s sub-giant stellar phase when it first left the Hydrogen burning &#8220;dwarf star&#8221; main-sequence. </p>
<p>Yes I know you were joking &#8211; just thought I&#8217;d point that out&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Incidentally, the same logic applies to almost all the other giant stars out there &#8211; Arcturus, we know, is a very ancient star thus probably metal-poor &#038; planetless, Capella started life as a binary of A or B-type stars each being twice as massive as the Sun or more. Betelegeuse and Antares at 15-20 solar masses are wa-ay too massive  to be considered and so forth. Pollux, OTOH, at 1 and a half or so solar masses and with a known exoplanet in a circular Jupiter-like (590-day) orbit  might be an exception to this rule &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dechel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197037</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dechel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197037</guid>
		<description>I sure hope that the aliens are not on Aldebaran - but is they are, man are they in for a surprise when Star Wars comes along :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope that the aliens are not on Aldebaran &#8211; but is they are, man are they in for a surprise when Star Wars comes along <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/comment-page-2/#comment-197022</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/03/what-must-et-think-of-us/#comment-197022</guid>
		<description>@Grumpy
&lt;i&gt;The Sopranos and Spongebob Squarepants are NOT bound for Procyon — because they were distributed via cable, not over the air&lt;/i&gt;
The Sopranos was on free-to-air non-cable network TV here in Oz so they&#039;re bound for somewhere for sure. Not on any regular schedule though so the aliens may have to wait some time for the finale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Grumpy<br />
<i>The Sopranos and Spongebob Squarepants are NOT bound for Procyon — because they were distributed via cable, not over the air</i><br />
The Sopranos was on free-to-air non-cable network TV here in Oz so they&#8217;re bound for somewhere for sure. Not on any regular schedule though so the aliens may have to wait some time for the finale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
